Starting with first principles and the scientific method
America First Books
Featuring ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times

Rev Ted Pike Archive


Is the Hate Bill
in Trouble?

Rev. Ted Pike
20 May 2009

In mid-March, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Democrat leaders would soon strategize to pass the federal hate crimes bill. Their strategy is now clear.
House Judiciary head John Conyers would introduce hate bill HR 1913 into Judiciary in the last minutes before spring recess April 3. No one would know of it until Congress reconvened nearly two and a half weeks later, when Judiciary Democrats would rush it to easy House passage. Meanwhile, Sen. Edward Kennedy would have introduced his Senate version just before House victory. Early the following week, Sen. Patrick Leahy’s Judiciary Democrats would speed it to triumph on the Senate floor. With no difference between the two bills, conference would not be needed. A quick final vote by House and Senate Democrats would bring it to the President’s desk, where it would become law as early as May 14. The hate bill would be a done deal long before a lethargic religious right could gear up for effective opposition. Hate bill architect, the Anti-Defamation League, would then be ready to inspire prosecution of any pastor, talk show host or ordinary citizen whose criticism of federally protected groups (homosexuals, Muslims, Jews, Latinos, etc.) might be blamed for inciting a hate crime.
But the above agenda was challenged and slowed. (Read this account in my article, “Action, not just Prayer, Can Kill the Hate Bill,” May 18, Democrats made a critical blunder by defending the hate bill’s protection of homosexual pedophiles. Their strategic error awoke the religious right while re-energizing the protest of listeners to alternative right-wing media. Many followed Rep. Steve King’s advice to call the 19 members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and protest the “Pedophile Protection Act.”
It’s been more than two weeks since the hate bill could have been passed in the Senate.
Yet the situation remains grave.
In 2005, the vote for hate bill passage was 65-33; about 17 Republicans voted for it. In 2007, the vote was 60-39; about 11 Republicans voted for the bill and 2 Democrats voted against. Today, hate bill forces include 60 Democrats as well as liberal Republicans like Susan Collins (co-signer), Michael Crapo (longtime supporter), Richard Lugar, Olympia Snowe, and others. Lovers of freedom have a heavy lift in bucking this hate bill majority in the Senate! In fact, this time we cannot approach the numbers necessary to filibuster it.
So why are Judiciary Democrats dawdling? I will repeat what I said in my latest e-alert: The last thing Sen. Leahy wants is to publicly open the hate bill issue. He doesn’t want Republican Judiciary members asking the now-red hot question: “Will you also refuse to exclude pedophiles from special protection?” Leahy may be at an impasse. If he bulls the bill through Judiciary without hearings, he will appear to be short-circuiting legislative due process— proving to Congress that the hate bill can’t face scrutiny. But if he waits much longer, he risks losing support from Democrats, increasingly leery of being branded "pro-pedophile" in the upcoming midterm elections.
Hate bill advocates have two choices. They can wait and hope the furor from the conservative right dies down. Or they can boldly amend the bill in Judiciary to say: “Nothing in this bill may be construed as protecting, under the class of “sexual orientation,” any illegal activity.” Then they can trumpet to all wavering politicians that S. 909 will not protect pedophiles.

Defeating the Amendment

How can we argue against this almost inevitable amendment? Remember, by creating a special, federally protected pseudo-class called “sexual orientation,” the hate bill must include all homosexuals. These include a large percentage who are pedophiles, preying on young boys.
Of course, homosexuals already have equal rights and protection against any crime along with all Americans. But under S. 909, penalties three levels higher are recommended against those who victimize homosexuals out of bias. As a result, homosexuals are automatically considered roughly three times more important than other crime victims. Federal and state law enforcement will be triply diligent to aid anyone, including a pedophile, who claims to be victimized because he is a homosexual. This heightened attention by the government to the cry of “Hate crime!” from a homosexual pedophile has nothing to do with whether he is guilty or innocent. Instead, his status under “sexual orientation” guarantees initial federal and state delivery of services which a heterosexual rapist or child molester cannot enjoy.
No one can deny that the hate bill gives at least preliminary special rights, services and protections to a homosexual pedophile. It also gives him the privilege of making life a living hell for the person he accuses. Anyone accused of a hate crime, facing possible years of imprisonment, must prepare to defend himself with the best lawyer he can afford and possible extravagant court costs.
To amend the bill saying it won’t give such privileges and protections is simply a contradiction. Like Sec. 10 of S. 909 (which claims the hate bill will never threaten free speech), this possible new amendment would only thinly frost the real threat of the bill.

Hit Democrats Where it Hurts

This amendment could be sensationally effective propaganda if adopted by the Senate Judiciary Committee immediately before floor action in the Senate. We can help prevent that by widely discussing and arguing against it on talk radio, internet, etc.
But right now we must impact politicians not intellectually but on a primal level: their instinct for political survival. They must know that with midterm elections coming soon for some, a substantial number of their constituents unalterably associate the hate bill with protection of pedophiles. Any Senator who votes for the bill will face their wrath at election time.
Is the hate bill in trouble? It depends how much trouble YOU make for it by calling members of the Senate and Senate Judiciary Committee at 877-851-6437 toll free or 202-225-3121 toll. Tell them: "If the Senator votes for the pedophile-protecting hate bill, I and my friends will never forgive or forget."




Watch the dynamic 10-minute educational videos, "Stop the Pedophile-Protecting Hate Bill!, at which explains how the hate bill, S. 909, ends freedom. Please tell the offices of members of Congress to watch it! Also at, watch our gripping 82-minute documentary "Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians."

Let the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians:

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this topic. Call (503) 631-3808.

P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015


America First Books Editor's Note

For those new to this controversy, please link to the following articles:

Fox News Rips "Pedophile-Protecting" Hate Bill:

...[Fox News anchor Megyn] Kelly interviewed Rep. Steve King, who attempted to amend the hate bill in Judiciary last week to explicitly exclude pedophiles. King reported how Rep. Alcee Hastings, a pro-hate bill Democrat, proudly claimed practitioners of 547 paraphilias listed by the American Psychiatric Association can "live without fear" once the hate bill is passed.
Ms. Kelly also expressed indignation that, while the Democrats acted to protect pedophiles, they rejected Republican efforts to obtain similar special protection for war veterans. Especially in times of unpopular wars, these are common victims of "hate crimes," spit upon or attacked because of who they are -- military defenders of America's freedom...

Alert to Congress Regarding Hate Bills and the False Flag Attack Threat by America First Books publisher William B. Fox. Two-thirds down the web page please find the essay "The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons."
Also, earlier on this same page I comment:

Although Rev Ted Pike is completely independent from Captain May and myself in terms of his political and religious views, the threats we address all stem from the same corrupt power elite. I mention in my concluding remarks below that this elite “would mobilize us into domestic tyranny and foreign wars, while distracting us from economic depression and the groups that brought it about.”
This is the real problem, not the lack of more “hate crime” laws. If anything, we need even more freedom of speech to speak truth to power, sort out our problems, and develop peaceful strategies to handle high level malefactors. This is why we urgently need for members of Congress to not only take a principled stand and stop all hate crime legislative initiatives, but to also roll back all the existing hate crime laws currently on the books.

Hate crime laws actually pose a major national security threat. They condition Americans to feel that certain types of thought are inherently immoral or illegal, even if they do not result in any form of violence or infringement on the rights of others.
In our articles related to false flag attacks, Capt. Eric H. May and I have discussed strong evidence that Mossad-CIA was behind 9-11, the mere "thought" of which would some day be outlawed once hate crime oversight bureaucracies become firmly implanted in America. We can expect government hate crime overwatch entities to experience the usual cancerous growth and abuse of power that libertarian writer and Presidential candidate Harry Browne described in his classic book Why Government Doesn't Work.
Please find out more about the hate crime issue in the Rev Ted Pike archive.

Please discover important alternative religious and secular viewpoints on freedom of speech issues at America First Books:

a) The Rev Ted Pike archive
b) The Religious Crisis page

These web pages address not only conservative Christian and Christian Zionist viewpoints, but also secular, anarcho-libertarian, atheist, pagan (paricularly Asatru/Odinist), racial nationalist, and "miscellaneous other" perspectives.

Flag carried by the 3rd Maryland Regiment at the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.