Starting with first principles and the scientific method
America First Books
Featuring ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times

William B. Fox Archive
Mission of Conscience Book II Contents


Chapter 23

and the Creation of the Perfect
Police State Mouse Trap

First published mid-Feb 2010
Last updated 2 Aug 2010

In chapter 8 we discussed how intimidation and local control are prime ingredients of a false flag attack.
In the wake of 9-11, the Bush administration, and many groups closely allied with its New World Order goals, made a major offensive along many fronts to effectively destroy what is left of Americans’ First Amendment right of freedom of speech.
And why should we be surprised?  Why wouldn’t any group of high level malefactors evil enough to kill 3,000 Americans in a false flag attack to lure America into an unnecessary war also be evil enough to kill all our civil liberties?
This chapter covers a major move to finally destroy the last vestiges of U.S. sovereignty by merging the U.S., Canada, and Mexico into a North American Union, as a last step towards New World Order global dictatorship.
This chapter also covers how NSPD-51, implemented in late spring 2007, reflected a culmination of the consolidation trend on the military-police leve, as reflected in exercises held beginning that summer in the Pacific Northwest.  


First, let us address the high level assault on national sovereignty that took place going into fall 2006, as documented in the documentary ENDGAME: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, by Alex Jones, released in Oct 2007 and previously cited in Chapter 5. At 54:31 into the documentary, we learn how the attempt to destroy American sovereignty through the formation of the North American Union was fortunately interdicted:

For over fifty years, the Bilderburg Group constructed the European Union by stealth under the guise of trade deals. Now the Elite are using the same secretive program to complete a North American Union.
But this time, super-state integration is on the extreme fast-track. International agreements like NAFTA, GAAT, and APAC were just stepping-stones in the formation of the NAU.
The North American Union was officially born at Baylor University in Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The leaders of the United States, Mexico, and Canada told the press that they were only meeting to discuss trade. It soon leaked that a secret meeting had been held during the Security and Prosperity trilateral summit. The three governments had refused to release the secret agreement to the people.
In September of 2006, their treasonous operation was blown wide-open. From September 12 to September 14 in Banff, Canada hundreds of elected and appointed government leaders from Canada, Mexico, and the United States met in secret.
On the last day of the conference, someone from inside the secret North American Union forum leaked the agenda. The font pages of newspapers across Canada carried the story.
The Judicial Watch foundation submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain a full agenda and minutes of the secret assembly.
Many federal agencies refused, citing national security. The foundation finally succeeded, and did receive thousands of pages of documents. The documents marked “UNCLASSIFIED” are the blueprints of a shadow government ruling by bureaucratic and executive fiat. The pages chronicle an already-operating North American Union. Transportation. Law Enforcement. Agriculture. Regulation. Banking. Manufacturing. Construction. Education. Immigration. And even the military are being merged, with no input by the people, or their elected representatives in Congress and Parliament.
One of the first items on their agenda was to stress how important it was that their plan be “carried out by stealth”. The controllers also talked about exploding the public’s fears of climate change to push a continent-wide new tax fund the new government “CARBON TAX.”
Globalist tool Robert Pastor is incessantly paraded on the world stage as the “Man Behind the North American Merger.” When he testified before Congress he pushed the idea of a continent-wide “security perimeter” that erases national boundaries and merges the security apparatus. The best way to secure the United States today is not at our two borders with Mexico and Canada but at the boarders of North America as a whole. In fact, the North American command, based in Colorado Springs, Colorado was clearly running the meeting in Canada.
For the past decade, the Pentagon has been training with Mexican and Canadian forces. And has openly discussed using them inside the United States for disasters, and to quell “domestic unrest”. There are already over 100,000 non-U.S. citizens serving in the U.S. armed forces. The Pentagon is now expanding its recruiting centers in Mexico, the Phillipines, and Eastern Europe. Big state police departments nation-wide are lobbying to change laws so that they can recruit non-U.S. citizens to join the police force.
What we are witnessing is a “Red Dawn” [movie] scenerio in slow motion. Tyrants throughout history have brought in foreigners to oppress their domestic populations. When their coup-by-stealth was exposed. The three governments went into damage control mode. The Security and Prosperity partnership quickly staged as show-summit, that was held in Ottowa, Canada in February 2007.



In his 9 April 2007 article "Idaho Nixes American Union: Thirteen states join Idaho lawmakers to stop globalist plan for the Americas," American Free Press journalist Mark Anderson noted how this nefarious grab for power received blow back by various states:

THE STATES WHICH, ONCE UPON A TIME, created the federal government under the Constitution are trying to give their arrogant "offspring" some direction. But over the long haul, the very-wealthy and well-connected, through their media empire, think tanks, foundations, banking schemes, lobbying outfits and other means, have led that offspring astray, severely corrupting it while sharply eclipsing the average person's influence on the federal government.
Stepping up to the plate, Idaho has now become the first state to pass a legislative resolution, House Joint Memorial No. 5, in an effort to direct the U.S. Congress to drop out of the North American Union, or NAU a proposed economic-political merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada. The resolution also calls on Congress to withdraw from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America, an initiative designed to lay the groundwork for the NAU.
The NAU is approximately modeled after the European Union, or EU, which is comprised of formerly independent nations and is largely ruled by a centralized bureaucracy in Brussels.
The 13 states besides Idaho urging Congress to nix the NAU/SPP are: Georgia, Arizona, Missouri, Illinois, Oregon, Montana, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington and Virginia.
Some of the state resolutions oppose the creation of North American Free Trade Agreement "superhighways" like the Trans-Texas Corridor, or TTC, a super-wide highway, railway and utility system slated to be built parallel to Interstate 35 from Laredo, Texas, north to the border with Oklahoma, with concrete tributaries and other tollways rippling through Texas as part of a continental cargo transport system.
According to a, passage of Idaho's detailed resolution was credited to grassroots activists. The resolution itself makes several points, such as, according to the U.S. Commerce Department, U.S. trade deficits with Canada and Mexico "have significantly increased since the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement . . . and the volume of imports from Mexico has soared since NAFTA, straining security checks at the U.S. border and the NAFTA superhighway system from the West Coast of Mexico through the United States and into Canada has been suggested as part of a North American Union to facilitate trade among the SPP countries."

The Assault on Individual Sovereignty

Obviously the First Amendment is Americans’ most important last remaining right, for without it no one can communicate, express ideas, present facts, argue positions, or otherwise do all the rudimentary things required to adequately oppose false flag operations or any other form of high level criminality.  Furthermore, regarding the Info War, without the First Amendment it would become impossible to resist efforts by high level malefactors to fasten a totalitarian ideology upon the people to permanently secure their power base.  
To paraphrase the Lord of the Rings, that would be the last measure of “One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.”
The Bush administration quickly pushed through the repressive Patriot Act immediately after 9-11, followed by the Military Commissions Act, and a host of other restraints on civil liberties.   It tried to recruit citizens into surveillance and fake security programs, such as Neighborhood Watch and the FBI’s InfraGard.  It employed torture overseas and tried to condition the American public to accept domestic torture under certain circumstances, much as it is already used in Israel .   Jewish groups such as the ADL, closely allied with Mossad-CIA, continually pushed for more restrictive “hate crime” legislation with abstract language provisions that could later be used to equate “hate speech” with any form of political dissent authorities seek to criminalize.
One of the most ominous developments in the predictive programming area was the TV series 24. It is hard to imagine a series better more carefully calculated to condition Americans to accept the "Global War on Terror" concept in general, and the use of torture in particular.

The series logo can be interpreted as a numerological black flag, such as a "no quarter" death threat 24 hours a day


Even more suspicious, this series premiered within two months of 9-11. If we naively presume that its top producers responded to 9-11,then somehow they accomplished everything without going through "Pilot Season" that usual comes in the first four months of the year, not to mention the months or years that pilots are typically under development, not to mention additional months or years of "Development Hell" that are common in the televison industry. 24 even fast-tracked the minimum of dozens of people and over a 1,000 hours it typically takes to craft a one hour TV show. It also managed to chug two seasons beyond Season 6, despite the fact that "repeated criticism from fans, critics, and media watchdogs" decried declining series quality. The Wikipedia article "24 (TV Series)" (June 2010 version) notes that "At the conclusion of its eighth and final season, 24 became the longest-running espionage-themed television drama ever, surpassing both Mission: Impossible and The Avengers." This series clearly enjoyed plenty of prescient and persistent high level "push."
This article also provides the following overview:

24 is an American serial drama television series starring Kiefer Sutherland as federal agent Jack Bauer, produced for the Fox Network and syndicated worldwide. The show is presented in the semblance of real time, with each 24-episode season covering 24 hours in the life of Bauer. First broadcast on November 6, 2001, the show ran for 192 episodes over eight seasons, with the series finale broadcast on May 24, 2010. In addition, the television movie 24: Redemption was broadcast between seasons six and seven, while a feature film is also planned.
Bauer is the only character to have appeared in all eight seasons, as well as appearing in every episode of the series. The series begins with him working for the Los Angeles based Counter Terrorist Unit (CTU), for whom he is characterized as a highly proficient agent, but one taking an "ends justify the means" approach regardless of the perceived morality of some of his actions. Throughout the series most of the main plot elements unfold like a political thriller. A typical plot has Jack Bauer racing against the clock as he attempts to thwart multiple terrorist plots, including presidential assassination attempts, nuclear, biological and chemical threats, cyber attacks, as well as conspiracies dealing with government and corporate corruption.


The Wikipedia article "Critical Reaction to 24 (TV Series)" (June 2010 version) has a section on public criticism over 24's use and depiction of torture:

The program routinely includes scenes of torture, both physical and psychological, and CTU is portrayed as employing several personnel exclusively for this purpose—characters Richards, Johnson, and Burke are only seen on-screen when they are torturing someone. Jack Bauer himself also is prepared to torture suspects both physically and emotionally.
In its first five seasons there were 67 scenes of torture—more than any other show on television,[6][7] Melissa Caldwell, the Parents Television Council's Senior Director of Programs, said:

"24 is the worst offender on television: the most frequent, most graphic, and the leader in the trend of showing the protagonists using torture."[8]

Subsequently, the PTC launched a campaign to try to persuade sponsors to stop buying airtime for 24,[9] having named several episodes as "the worst television programs of the week"[10][11][12]

The depictions of torture as effective and necessary have prompted considerable criticism from human rights activists, military officials, experts in questioning and interrogation, and even from fans of the series.[6] Stephen King, an admitted fan of 24, wrote[13],

"There's also a queasily gleeful subtext to 24 that suggests, 'If things are this bad, why, I guess we can torture anybody we want! In fact, we have an obligation to torture in order to protect the country! Hooray!' Yet Jack Bauer's face — increasingly lined, increasingly haggard — suggests that extreme measures eventually catch up with the human soul."

People affiliated with 24, as well as many of its fans, have responded to this criticism by stressing that the show is fiction and therefore is not required to portray torture and interrogation realistically,[14] but in February, 2007, The New Yorker magazine reported that U.S. Army Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan (dean of the United States Military Academy at West Point), accompanied by three of the most experienced military and FBI interrogators in the country, met with the producers of 24 to criticize the show for misrepresenting the effectiveness of torture as an interrogation technique, saying it encouraged soldiers to see torture as a useful and justified tactic in the War on Terror, and damaged the international image of the United States.[8] Brigadier General Finnegan believed the show had an adverse effect on the training of American soldiers because it advocated unethical and illegal behavior. In his words:

"The kids see it, and say, ‘If torture is wrong, what about “24”?’ The disturbing thing is that although torture may cause Jack Bauer some angst, it is always the patriotic thing to do."[8]

Joe Navarro, one of the FBI's top experts in questioning techniques, also attended the meeting. He told The New Yorker,

"Only a psychopath can torture and be unaffected. You don’t want people like that in your organization. They are untrustworthy, and tend to have grotesque other problems."[8][15]

The New Yorker article itself echoed many of these criticisms, and went on to suggest that the show's portrayal of torture was a reflection of the political views of its creator, Joel Surnow, an avowed conservative and supporter of George W. Bush.[8] The New Yorker's criticism of 24 and Surnow was picked up by other commentators and bloggers. Andrew Sullivan, for instance, argued that 24 repeatedly used the "ticking time-bomb" scenario "in such a way as to normalize torture in the public consciousness."[16]

At this point, it is important for us to consider how the use of torture not only violates basic principles of the U.S. Constitution, but was also dismissed for both practical and ethical reasons by one of the most effective interrogators for Adolf Hitler during World War II. First, let us consider how torture constitutes a particularly outrageous assault on the U.S. Constitution.
The use of torture violates several Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution, to include the Fourth Amendment ("The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures"), the Fifth Amendment (prohibition against bearing witness against oneself and the guarantee of "due process") and the Eighth Amendment (prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment").
There are also many very practical reasons why many military intelligence professionals disapprove of torture, even when dealing with non-U.S. citizen "terrorists" or "enemy combatants" who might fall outside of some official P.O.W. status covered by the Geneva Convention. As a trained military interrogator myself, I would like to weigh in with the following points:
(a) The use of torture invites reciprocation against ones own servicemen and civilians under enemy control. It typically alienates would-be allies, turns neutrals into enemies, and makes existing enemies that much more determined. It fosters a thuggish and uncivilized image. Furthermore, once one uses "fear up" brutalization methods, it is very hard to go back to more civilized approaches to get prisoners to voluntarily supply information and insights.
(b) Good intelligence work typically involves a very meticulous and patient process of collating and analyzing vast amounts of information. It is often very intellectual, like conducting various forms of academic or scientific research and analysis. As one example, Hanns Scharf, the protagonist of The Interrogator: The Story of Hanns Joachim Scharff: Master Interrogator of the Luftwaffe by Raymond F. Toliver got everything he wanted out of all but 10 of 510 captured Allied airmen by combining thorough preparation, the use of charm and other disarming approaches, and clever questioning techniques. Scharff never used torture, even though he was one of the most effective interrogators of the Third Reich. In fact, Scharff was so highly respected that after World War II he was invited as a speaker to veterans association meetings in the U.S. consisting of the very men he had interrogated! He also showed his meticulous side by creating mosaics of fairly tale scenes that are on display as part of the Cinderella Castle at Walt Disney World.

If Herr Scharff (1907-1992) were alive today, he would probably be getting another last laugh.  American aces James Brooks and Robert DeHaven, and generals James Doolittle and Curtis LeMay, were present at a banquet in Santa Ana, California honoring Hanns Joachim Scharff (second from right) in October 1980.  From The Interrogator, page 321.


Some of the best intelligence comes from the ability to go on repeated fishing expeditions with subjects who are handled by their interrogator to become more relaxed and comfortable with their questioner rather than more brutalized, defensive and fearful. Furthermore, if an interrogator is too stupid and ham-fisted to ask clever questions and conduct himself with the kind of finesse that earns the respect and willing cooperation of his subjects, he should not be in the intelligence field to begin with. By definition, he is incapable of intelligently going about the intelligence process.
(c) In the real world, the use of torture, paradoxically enough, is usually about everything except competent intelligence gathering and analysis. The real objective of torture is typically to fabricate enough "evidence" through "confessions" to yield a politically useful predetermined result rather than to uncover real facts and conduct logical analysis that lets the chips scientifically fall where they may. The use of torture tends to attract thugs, psychopaths, sadists, control freaks, power-trippers, and other miscreants in the higher levels of the intelligence services who delight in torture for its own sake, and are relatively poor at conducting effective intelligence operations. In addition, torture is typically sanctioned at an even higher level by political leaders whose real goal is degradation and genocide, not genuine intelligence gathering and analysis. In contrast, Scharf was widely respected as a "gentleman" by the very prisoners who gave away vital infomation to him, even when his experience and methods were made public after WWII.
(d) From a purely pragrmatic or utilitarian viewpoint, the decision about whether or not to use torture is ultimately a long run vs. short run tradeoff. It is true that in the short run, there are exceptional situations where the use of fear methods, to include torture, can be very effective. However, taking everything into account, to include the fact that sustaining a comprehensive intelligence network of informers typically requires attracting voluntary cooperation, the use of torture typically creates does more harm than good over the long run both in terms of real costs and opportunity costs. The latter costs involves alienating people who would have ordinarily provided assistance.
I provide an example about how torture can dry up an informant network and harden resistance in Chapter 11. It is worth repeating it here:

...In his 18 September 2007 first hour radio show, former Naval Intelligence officer Wayne Madsen interviewed Sgt. Frank "Greg" Ford, a former counterintelligence agent in the California National Guard's 223rd Military Intelligence (M.I.) Battalion who was stationed in Samarra , Iraq . Ford claimed that he had to revive four Iraqi children who passed out from torture. Their screams could be heard through prison windows in Iraqi neighborhoods. He said that when Americans initially moved into the area, many Iraqis were happy to approach him to give him intelligence information. However, once the child torture began, his contacts quickly dissipated. Worse yet, Iraqis started to warn him that if the Americans did not quit the child torture, they would launch an insurgency by June 15th...

Ironically, one of the best ways to obtain information has nothing to do with fear tactics or any form of military coercion, but rather it involves representing a society that people around the world can genuinely respect and admire. People come forth with information because they feel that your society is worth having commerce with.
(e) Some of the most effective interrogation techniques involve using an exact opposite approach from torture, to include situations where the interrogator assumes a poker face or a "we know all" demeanor, complete with the use of extensive files and dossiers as props as well as real background. The use of torture creates the impression that the interrogator is desperate to get information out of the prisoner. In contrast, in The Interrogator Scharf got some of his best information when he treated his interrogations like mere "administrative processing sessions." He acted unimpressed or even bored while prisoners spilled the beans with vital information, as if he knew it all along, when in actuality he was very pleasantly surprised. The idea is to make prisoners as relaxed and off guard as possible. Most people have a tendency to want to talk about themselves, and many military prisoners have tendency to emotionally regress. They want to act like they are civilians again who can just "do their own thing." Paradoxically, the use of handcuffs, confinement, and other "normal" restraining methods typically put prisoners under more than enough fear, stress, apprehension, and humiliation as it is. Torture is "over kill."
We can gain an important perspective on the torture issue when we consider how Israel routinely uses it on Palestinians. The campaign to get Americans to accept torture makes perfect sense when one considers that Israel has a number of geopolitical objectives that are consistent with its use, namely a desire to (a) degrade Palestinians as part of a broader campaign to genocide or otherwise terrorize them into accepting eviction out of Palestine or even "Greater Israel" (b) permanently cripple any societies in the Middle East such as Iraq and Iran that might in any way challenge Israeli power (c) join America at the hip with Israel morally and politically so that Israel does not look as reprehensible on the world stage by comparison (d) frighten people around the world into appeasement and submission towards proponents of a New World Order Zionist dictatorship and (e) to act out "Chosen Master Race" megalomania and other psychiatric problems unique to the Jewish people that I have already touched upon in Chapter 5.
Hence, any national media programming that conditions Americans to accept torture can be viewed as part of a much broader campaign to degrade their national sovereignty, civil liberties, and moral and spiritual health.

The official promotional picture for the cast of Series 6 of 24. Note the UK and U.S. flags alongside a blue-striped flag suggestive of Israel, except the Star of David has been replaced with what might be interpreted as an Illuminati or Masonic pyramid consistant with the "New World Order." Many critics view the U.S., UK, and UN as primary riding horses of the Zionist NWO (see The New Babylon and the New Jerusalem by Michael Collins Piper).


According to Wikipedia, 24 was popular among "conservatives," which helps to explain why "conservatism" has been such a weak "counter predator" in America in regard to holding "predators" in check like the proponants of unlimited federal government and unlimited Zionism:

During the event, Limbaugh, a fan of the show himself, commented that "Everybody I've met in the government that I tell I watch this show, they are huge fans." He specifically identified Vice President Dick Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Republican political strategist Mary Matalin as enthusiastic fans.[18] The event audience also included Justice Thomas and radio talk show host Laura Ingraham.
The show is popular among conservatives.[19] Time magazine ran an article on January 14, 2007, analyzing the show's political tilt. [20] The article argued that whilst the show's use of the "ticking time bomb scenario" favored conservative interpretations, the thriller is itself a conservative genre and that such scenarios "make for exciting TV". Furthermore, journalist James Poniewozik pointed out the show's use of plotlines—such as an invasion of a Middle East country based on fabricated evidence of WMD stockpiles and a "chilling" depiction of Muslims rounded up into detention centers—favored a more liberal view. Joel Surnow is also quoted as noting that the show has fans across the political spectrum, from Limbaugh to Barbra Streisand. TIME concludes that: "24's ideology—Jack Bauerism, if you will—is not so much in between left and right as it is outside them, impatient with both A.C.L.U. niceties and Bushian moral absolutes."

Captain May noted in his interviews that the Bush administration was stealthily building a mouse trap around Americans that most Americans would not understand until it got sprung on them –but of course by  then it would be too late.
Captain May has always maintained that the torture at Guantanamo was really not ultimately directed at Arab terrorists; its real objective was to condition the U.S. military to accept torture and coercion to later use to intimidate regular U.S. citizens, especially during a martial law clamp down.  It was part of a disturbing pattern to condition the American public to curtail dissent and submit to more authoritarian direction that included rubber bullets freely used against anti-Iraq war demonstrators, humiliating searches conducted at air ports, and confinement of demonstrators into “free speech zones” at national political conventions.
Capt. May’s second important point is that the ultimate goal of the Bush cabal was not only to negate the Constitution, but also to reverse the American Revolution.  If permitted to fulfill its “dream sheet” agenda without any local opposition, the Bush cabal would convert American into a nation of needy, mind-controlled, peasant masses.
For this reason, May wrote many articles addressing free speech issues.  As we pointed out at the end of Chapter 21 we addressed the religious support base for criminal forms of Zionism. The point-blank assault on the First Amendment is another macro-social issue we inevitable have to address when we start tracing the ultimate roots of the Info War waged against America and the world.  
Capt May’s third important point is that this is a deliberately planned “mouse trap” that puts a noose around the neck of the free speech rights of the average American in a very slow, patient, and subtle, and incremental way.  There are several very important implications of this concept:

·        It is not necessary for legislators to create specific language that threatens direct freedom of speech rights.  Indeed, a lot of “hate crime” legislation is couched in clever language that links speech to somehow inciting  “illegal violence,”  “child pornography,” “child molestation,” “illegal racial discrimination,“ or “violent attacks on federally protected groups.  What is more significant is that this legislation creates vast centralized bureaucracies who are concerned about what Americans think and say.  One can trust that over time, through usual bureaucratic “mission creep,” these bureaucracies will fulfill all the worst Orwellian nightmares.  Furthermore, Americans are being conditioned on a subliminal level to accept the idea that federal bureaucrats and private groups like the ADL should monitor and punish the expression of thought at taxpayer expense, and backed up by the coercive police power of the state. An excellent example of “mission creep” comes from the online video America : From Freedom to Fascism by Aaron Russo.  He investigated the IRS and could find no specific laws requiring the filing of income tax returns or authorizing its collection of personal income taxes.  Nevertheless, despite its lack of specific authorization in many areas, the IRS has created mountains of regulations and gone ahead and acted the way government bureaucrats feel they should be able to act.

·        Because of the very dangerous threat of “mission creep,” all hate crime laws currently on the books should be repealed.   It is not enough to block proposed new legislative initiatives.  We also have to educate the public to understand the fallacy of the whole hate crime concept.

·        One has to focus on capability as well as action. The federal government has given itself the capability to create nationwide martial law and dictatorship.  Just because it has not exercised it yet does not mean it is not real.  Citizens have to develop a local capability to oppose federal and ADL tyranny before they can begin to breathe easily.  Currently, the individuals who have created the “mouse trap” hope to run a false flag attack, and then clamp down on the public faster than it can react in order to achieve a lasting and irreversible dictatorship.

At my web site, I have created a long web page titled “the Rev Ted Pike archive” in which I list articles by many different authors in addition to Pike that explore the “hate crime” issues in much greater depth.  The following is one of my essays that explains why the “hate crime” concept is itself bogus and dangerous:


The Hate Crime Law Concept:
It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons

by William B. Fox

The whole "hate crime" concept serves at least nine sinister purposes:

It encourages the use of "legal terrorism," where laws are used as snares to wage legal harassment campaigns. Deep-pocketed entities wear out and bankrupt their political adversaries by dragging them through nuisance litigation. Employers become scared to hire or retain politically conscious straight white males for fear that they could become targets of nuisance "civil rights" and "hate crime"-related suits or backdoor whisper campaigns or negative national media spin that could hurt their businesses.

2) "Hate crime" laws support political "victimhood" for "minorities." In fact, they work so well to promote artificially inflated white guilt that we see numerous cases of "hate crime" hoaxes staged by minorities, such as the Tawana Brawley affair.

3) The "hate crime" concept creates a "guilt by association" climate regarding certain topics, thereby helping to inhibit certain types of thought and analysis. This has been particularly true regarding topics involving racial differences or criminal behavior by Jews. The big danger is that once certain types of "thought" is tainted with a "criminal association," and the focus of "criminality" is taken off certain actions, then any thing that the people in power do not like can be tainted with "criminality." For starters, any ideas or attitudes that they find "subversive" for any reason can become criminalized as "seditious" ("sedition" implies arousing some form of "hatred" or "dislike" for the state). This is how Stalin was able to liquidate members of the Bolshevik old guard he did not like during the 1930's show trials. "Disloyalty" was defined as anything the self-styled "infallible leader" of the Communist Party happened to say is "disloyal" for the moment. Conditioning the general public to accept the concept of "hate crime" is an important step towards this kind of total police state tyranny. After all, if the government today can triple penalties when someone commits a violent act against a minority member while voicing a racial epithet, just wait until they can catch you doing some little illegal thing that involves the government and then find a way to link this to something you have said that is critical of the government (immediately construed as "hateful" of course) so that they can then multiply the penalties three, five, ten, or however many times they like. So for example if a cop catches you going three mph over the speed limit on a Federal road like an Interstate, they will know that you deliberately went over the speed limit because you happened to once say something critical of the government a few years back and therefore must have a "bad" (or "hateful") attitude. Therefore you deserve perhaps a one hundred times multiplied penalty such as ten years in a penitentiary as just desserts. If this sounds totally absurd, just reflect on how once upon a time people got shot in the old Soviet Union for very simple things like owning a copy of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. See how it works?

4) "Hate crime" laws deflect attention away from the fact that the white population in America is being slowly genocided, and that it has its own moral right to exist. As Thomas W. Chittum observes in Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, the white population in America has been steadily declining by about 1-1.5% of the total population a year for many, many years. An American Renaissance article observed that in recent decades, 30 million white Americans have been replaced by 30 million Mexicans. European history shows that once a dominant ethno-racial group drops below 75% of the total population within a country, it tends to become increasingly unstable. Chronic instability in turn tends to lead to things like secessionism, civil war, or police state repression designed to keep things unified at all costs.

"Hate crime" laws deflect attention away from the fact that under certain circumstances the emotion of "hate" is both healthy and desirable. People instinctively feel hatred towards those things which threaten to destroy them. It motivates them to take defensive action for their own preservation. If you believe in the right of self-defense, you must believe that the trait of hatred has survived as an instinct through evolution because it is vitally necessary for basic survival.

6) "Hate crime" laws tend to give the Federal government additional leverage points to control local state police. Give the massive resources of the Federal government, local state police then feel more intimidated to do whatever master puppeteer bureaucrats back in Washington, D.C. want them to do, no matter how arbitrary, ridiculous, or self-serving these things might be.

7) The piling on of more and more "hate crime" laws deflects attention away from the fact that in healthy societies, relatively few laws are needed for people to get along. The ancient Roman writer Tacitus once noted that "Where the state is most corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied." The late libertarian writer Harry Browne noted how the Anglo-Saxon Common Law is generally based on a few very simple, common sense principles.

8) "Hate crime" laws have been a disaster in Canada , Britain , and other supposedly "Western" countries, full of draconian "unintended consequences." People have been thrown in jail for making relatively mild criticisms regarding such topics as homosexuality, Holocaust claims, and pro-nonwhite racial policies. Significantly, the greatest promoter of "hate laws," the ADL, also blindly supports corrupt police state practices in the exclusively Jewish State of Israel . Please see my analysis of breathtaking examples of Jewish supremacist tyranny, criminality, psychopathology, arrogance, and hypocrisy in my mutualism vs. parasitism discussion. Not all Jews are bad, but for reasons that I explain in this article, they seem to have problems preventing sociopaths from rising to the top.

9) The ultimate goal of "hate crime" laws is to strangle any freedom of speech that supports awareness of Jewish criminal conduct, Jewish usurpation of our Constitution, and the overall Jewish contribution towards the destruction of America . They do not want us to know about how millions of Jews occupy our power centers in our biggest cities. They do not want us to think too hard about the implications of their incredible ethnic solidarity, control of major national media, control of major wealth and businesses, and control of the privately owned central banking cartel called the Federal Reserve. They do not want us to know about Jewish orchestration of Bolshevik mass murder in Russia, the Lavon Affair, the murder of JFK, their spy nests, their domination of organized crime, their creation of wide-open borders to the Third World, their deliberate assault on the U.S.S. Liberty, their ethnic cleansing of Palestine, their probable central involvement in executing the 9-11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center buildings, and hosts of other crimes documented in books such as Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, and The Viper's Venom. They want us to trust the "New World Order" elite totally and completely forsake popular sovereignty, the Constitution, and other traditions of freedom and self-determination related to our European ancestry and cultural heritage.
The Internet took them by surprise, so now they require more "hate crime" laws. They need to restore the curtain of darkness and the wall of illusion. They need to continue their campaigns to mainstream homosexuality, promote "life-style" abortions, and legitimize their Kosher brand of high treason against America . Despite scholarly evidence that much of the Old Testament may be based upon fabricated stories (see my discussion of religion in my online "Religious Crisis" web page), or polls that show that most American Jews are atheists, they still need to posture as a self-anointed, specially favored people of God.
At a time when America is on the ropes economically with skyrocketing debt and loss of industry -- at a time when America desperately needs to protect its own borders and to rebuild its internal industry, savings, and economic viability -- they unmercifully use us up as their continuing cannon fodder for global interventionism. They could care less if they suck us so dry that they set the stage for a Civil War Two disaster in North America .
Yes, my fellow Americans, ask not why America should continue serving as a willing stooge of Big Oil and Zionism in the Middle East . Ask not why America should willingly crucify itself for the benefit of the exclusively Jewish state of Israel . Ask not why you as a white person or as a member of a white community or even as a member of the white race even have a right to survive. (The same type of basic survival question also applies to non-Jewish nonwhites). They only want us to think in "approved" areas suggested by hate crime laws regardless of the utterly destructive consequences to ourselves.

All of this having been said, I would like to revisit some of the aforementioned points with some additional commentary.
As mentioned, "Legal Terrorism" involves entities with deep pockets who maliciously apply laws to drag their less well-financed adversaries through lengthy and costly legal proceedings in order to intimidate, bankrupt or otherwise neutralize them as the first objective, regardless of the merits of the cases involved. As four examples, in "Don't Practice Legal Terrorism," (Forbes, 09.04.06), Paul Johnson charges that overzealous, deep-pocketed government regulators threaten to kill entrepreneurial risk-taking with interventionist legal actions. In the book Legal Terrorism: The Truth About the Christic Institute, Dr. Susan Huck charged that a liberal institute misapplied Federal racketeering laws to drag out proceedings and potentially bankrupt former CIA officers, who were later awarded $1 million by a court for defendant's legal expenses. In the book The ACLU Vs. America: Exposing the Agenda to Redefine Moral Values, authors Alan Sears and Craig Osten claim that the ACLU has misused its deep pockets to wage a campaign of "legal terrorism" in support of its radical leftist agenda against poorly financed conservative adversaries. Lastly, the book Trial on Trial: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 by Lawrence Dennis describes how FDR deliberately dragged prominent American rightists through lengthy court proceedings on spurious charges in the early 1940's with the intent of impoverishing them, wasting their time, and intimidating would-be activists. Please see the Nov-Dec 1999 The Barnes Review online article "A Mockery of Justice: The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 " by Michael Collins Piper and Ken Hoop about this sad affair.
. . . In other words, proposed "hate crime" laws are really about creating additional minefields of legal snares that dramatically increase legal defense costs, liability risks, and administrative costs for "little guys" who dare to express dissident views. They are the ones who ultimately get driven under the table before plutocrats, well-endowed institutions, and deep-pocketed corporations. "Hate crime" laws are ultimately about big money boys who feel their power slipping away before a free Internet. They are desperately trying to preserve their special privileges, hide their corruption, and remain empowered to abuse others.
. . .Hate crime laws have virtually nothing to do with reducing or managing real "hate." In the final analysis, they have nothing to do with protecting gays, minorities, and other groups who are already adequately protected by the Constitution, tort law, and a vast menu of civil rights laws. However, as Rev Pike explains in his article "The Funeral of Free Speech," they have everything to do with putting state police under centralized federal command and creating a separate thought crime tribunal system (similar to what already exists in Canada) which is a major step towards a perfect police state. In fact, by suppressing civil liberties, the passage of "hate crime" laws actually increase overall hatred, alienation, and resentment in society. If they are passed, they may even help spark revolutionary rebellions. This is one reason why ADL Jewish supremacists and their Establishment collaborators talk about eliminating all private gun ownership, installing "total surveillance," and quietly going about building more FEMA detention camps.
If there is any "good" behind "hate crime laws," it is the fact that their absurdity helps thinking Americans understand the recklessly selfish, crooked, and irresponsible behavior of various members of America's alien ruling elite who continue to poison and trash up this once truly great country. Expressed in another way, once the extremely dangerous nature of the "hate crime" legislative initiatives finally sinks in, it should make responsible Americans really wonder about the malevolent and crooked character of the people who keep relentlessly pushing it.

If it seems too incredible and unbelievable to most Americans that there could be a longstanding, international conspiracy afoot to destroy all their First Amendment rights, one only has to look at what has already happened in supposedly already advanced “democracies” such as Canada and Finland regarding “hate speech laws.
The assault on the First Amendment relies first and foremost on intimidation.  We can feel grateful to alternative media publishers in America who refuse to buckle under, to include Willis Carto, who publishes the American Free Press, and Leon Smith, publisher of the Lone Star Iconoclast.
Leon Smith, incidentally, started running May’s articles in June 2006.  His office was based in Crawford , Texas , adjacent to Bush’s Western White House.  He supported Democratic Presidential Candidate John Kerry to spite Bush, and gained world fame for being a constant burr underneath Bush’s saddle.

Continually tweaking the nose of the murderous Bush cabal in its own back yard is not for the faint of heart.  Something seems to have rubbed off on W. Leon Smith. His great, great, great uncle was the famous Texas scout and intelligence agent Erastus “Deaf” Smith who William Travis, commander of the Alamo, once called  "The bravest of the brave in the cause of Texas ."  Smith provided vital intelligence that enabled Sam Houston to win the Battle of San Jacinto and the War of Texas Independence.   
In March 2009 I published two stories in the Lone Star Iconoclast  providing specific examples of citizens of both Finland and Canada who are persecuted by hate speech laws. 
The first story, reproduced below, involved Captain Erick May’s colleague Arthur Topham, publisher of the Radical Press, in British Columbia , Canada , who got run through a Canadian thought crime tribunal. 
The second case involved political asylum-seeker Henrik Holappa from Finland who got unexpectedly arrested and thrown  into the U.S. Federal Gulag without publicly declared charges.  I am extremely familiar with this latter case since I shared a supper table with Holappa for a month and a half prior to his arrest, and subsequently legal defense funds for him.  
As the reader scans these articles, one needs to keep in mind a 1-2-3 step triggering mechanism for the police state mouse trap being set up both in America and other Western countries.
The first step takes place when proposed hate crime legislation succeeds in integrating all “hate crime” enforcement under a centralized Federal entity, effectively run by “a private group” such as the ADL.  This eliminates any local power to counterbalance federal power, and leaves no place to seek refuge within U.S. borders.  See Rev Ted Pikes’s archive here  and his video:  “How to Kill the Hate Bills
On top of this, hate crime verbiage already in place in both federal and state law is kept abstract so that eventually “hate speech” that can mean anything that authorities want it to mean, to include any political dissent they dislike.  
Idaho attorney Edgar Steele wrote an excellent March 25, 2009 piece “We Are All Terrorists Now” that provides a vivid example regarding how abstract and encompassing definitions of “hate speech” and “terrorism” might become:    

Each week brings a fresh batch of outrageous events and news items that further marginalize an ever-growing percentage of Americans.  Last week brought a bumper crop, headed by an incredible document leaked by someone in the Missouri police bureaucracy. Entitled "The Modern Militia Movement," the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) document popped up on Alex Jones' web site and promptly sent shock waves throughout the patriot community. 

You're a Terrorist Now

Have you ever supported in any way Republican Ron Paul of Texas ?  How about last year's Libertarian Party Presidential candidate, Bob Barr?  Or the Constitution Party's Presidential candidate, Chuck Baldwin?  According to MIAC, you are a "militia-influenced terrorist."  Yep, you heard me right.  You are a terrorist.  Look, I couldn't just make up stuff as outlandish as is this sort of thing.  Truth continues to be stranger than fiction.  We're painting the roses red.
Better go scrape that bumper sticker off your car, because MIAC specifically identifies it as evidence that you should be watched and approached with caution.  MIAC is just one of 58 "fusion centers" funded throughout America by the federal Department of Homeland Security with over a quarter-billion dollars, tasked with identifying "potential trends or patterns of terrorist or criminal operations" (per the MIAC web site) in America.
Are you opposed to the coming North American Union (NAU), whereby America is subsumed within a new government encompassing all of North America ?  How about the New World Order (NWO), whereby America surrenders her Constitution altogether in favor of becoming just another cog in a world government?  Speak out against either the NAU or the NWO in any way and you are a terrorist, says MIAC, courtesy of your tax dollars spent in its support.
Of course, the MIAC report is nothing new.  During the Clinton administration, the FBI issued a document identifying "defenders of the US Constitution" as "Right-Wing Extremists" to be watched as being potential terrorists. 
Are you opposed to illegal immigration?  According to MIAC, you are a terrorist.  Libertarians and Constitutionalists are "racists," which might cause some consternation at the headquarters of my own state's ( Idaho ) Constitution Party, since its chairman is a Black man (Paul Venable, whom I intend to ask how he feels about MIAC's outlandish characterization).  Those who follow my writing and ranting know full well that I am a big supporter of the Constitution Party.
Are you opposed to abortion?  Terrorist.  
Do you fly an American flag?  Terrorist. 
Opposed to gun confiscation?  Terrorist.  
Opposed to the expansion of federal power at the expense of State jurisdiction?  Terrorist.
Are you concerned that Obama might put through a mandatory Universal Service Program (which has just been announced, incidentally)?  Terrorist.
Do you oppose the convening of a Constitutional Convention (now demanded by 32 of the 34 states necessary to force its convening) because you fear the further eroding or, even, eradication of the First and/or Second Amendments?  Terrorist.
Offered the chance to denounce MIAC or, at least, explain it away, Missouri's governor, Jay Nixon, unequivocally supported and defended it, stating, “Any way they take that information and can analyze what the threat levels are is important to make sure the public stays safe."

If this seems extreme to many readers, later in this chapter I reproduce a article by Paul Joseph Watson  written two and a half years earlier is consistent with what Edgar Steele describes later. 
After the federalized hate crime regime gets established, the second step comes when members of the public cross any special “federally protected groups” and get run before “hate crime” tribunals like Arthur Topham.  Certainly one of these groups will include allies of those friendly Mossad-CIA folks who like to bring us false flag attacks.  And of course “hate crime” in the long run will wind up in the long run simply being defined as anything the authorities hate to hear. Similarly, “terrorism” becomes anything that terrifies corrupt and incompetent bureaucrats with the notion of becoming accountable for their actions.
The “third step comes when you or I make a trip to the local grocery story, and next thing we know we have been stopped, arrested, and hauled off to a Federal detention facility like Henrik Holappa. The authorities remain vague about why they did it. 
The following are my articles for the Iconoclast that explain the specific cases of Arthur Topham and Henrik Holappa:

Arthur Topham:
Fighting the good fight against disinformation


Facing a
Thought Crime Tribunal
North of the Border

William B. Fox

March 11, 2009

William B. Fox

Arthur Topham is the brilliant Canadian publisher of The Radical Press. When I first learned that he will be forced to appear before a Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) tribunal, I felt the same kind of shock that many Americans once felt towards kangaroo court practices in Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany. After all, free speech activist Harmony Grant claims in “Free Speech Win in Canada” that these tribunals had a perfect conviction rate up until June 27, 2008 when the CHRC finally dismissed a complaint against Maclean’s magazine for anti-Muslim hate speech. See:
And since when are bureaucrats entitled to tell us when we should be allowed to think hostile thoughts or not?
And oh, by the way, if you are going to have “hate crime” laws, why shouldn’t Big Brother also have “love crime” laws to also tell us –with the coercive power of the state-- whenever we are inappropriately lovin’ as well as hatin’?


After this, "love crimes"?

The news about the tribunal also left me with the emotion of comradeship as well as dread. Arthur Topham has been a longstanding friend of my colleague Capt. Eric May, Intelligence Editor of The Lone Star Iconoclast, whose works I archive at:
After running his first successful mission to interdict what appeared to be a false flag nuclear strike attempt on the British Petroleum Refinery in Texas City , Texas on March 30, 2004, Capt. May tried to go underground by relocating to Canada . Arthur Topham offered to help May start a new life there. As fate had it, May was stopped by Canadian authorities at the border. His cover blown, May decided to return to Texas .
Regardless of the outcome, Topham had proven himself a true libertarian helper against King George totalitarianism under tough circumstances.
I subsequently fired off the following protest email (and you should send your own email as well!!!) to Nancy Lafontant, Registry Officer, Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, at, cc: .
(I have edited and modified the letter below slightly for this article. You can find the full original at:

Dear Ms. Lafontant:
I consider it a great honor to be able to send a letter in support of the free speech rights of Arthur Topham, publisher of The Radical Press, whose persecution under Canada’s draconian “hate crime”-related laws is being registered under file number T1360/9008.
… I have archived the works of free speech activist Rev. Ted Pike at: There is quite a lot of material on this web page that is relevant to this case.
….Numerous articles by Rev. Ted Pike and his niece Harmony Grant explain how the Canadian Human Rights Act is exactly the kind of Orwellian nightmare that we must avoid here in America at all costs. For this reason, I spent more than two full days of my time recently calling up every member of the House Judiciary Committee in Washington , D.C. to make my own personal strenuous effort to try to defeat the currently proposed “hate crime” legislation. My follow on email at has my essay “The Hate Crime Law Concept: It is all very sinister for at least nine major reasons” as well as contact data for all Judiciary members.
Please watch Rev. Ted Pike’s ten minute video that explains the Trojan Horse nature of proposed hate crime legislation in America, and how similar legislation has subverted Canadian free speech:

To put it bluntly, when it comes to the whole “hate crime” concept, the King wears no clothes. We should get all “hate crime” laws off the books and go back to being more free and civilized, as both Americans and Canadians were decades ago before all this Orwellian “hate crime” nonsense got snuck in through various Trojan Horse legislative initiatives.
As one example of an article I list in the Rev Ted Pike archive which explains the sinister nature of the Canadian Human Rights Commission is “Northern Gag Rule: Hate Speech Laws in Canada” by Harmony Grant at:
As another example, please see “Canada’s Damning Example Against Hate Laws" also by Harmony Grant at:
…Don’t you think it is really sad, Ms. Lafontant, that your country is now viewed so negatively? It appears that the witch hunts run by the Human Rights Commission are totally alien to Anglo-Saxon common law traditions that once protected free speech.
I understand that certain members of [the complainant] B’nai Brith want to suppress eighteen articles posted at Mr. Topham’s web site. [The list can be found at:].
….It is clear to me that all these articles are written in a thoughtful and intelligent manner and make an important contribution to public debate and general education.
Isn’t it amazing how many members of B’nai Brith can’t take criticism, but they can sure dish out vicious criticism and other abuse on others! Just look at what their co-tribalists have done to Palestinian innocents in Gaza recently!
….Why do they demand that laws protect them from criticism, yet it does not seem to work the other way around for others?
I urge my fellow Americans as well as brother Canadians to write emails as I have here to support Arthur Topham, a brave defender of free thought and true values of Western Civilization.
Best regards,
William B. Fox Publisher
America First Books


A more recent photo of Arthur Topham from an appeal for
donations to help fight well-moneyed enemies of freedom


I described Henrik Holappa’s case for political asylum in America in my March 18, 2009 Lone Star Iconoclast article “Asylum Seeker Jailed for His Opinions –In America!”:    

His immigration attorney summarized his political persecution in his asylum application dated Oct 10, 2009:

In recent years, the country of Finland has become home to many immigrants from Somalia and Turkey . Since the influx of these immigrants, the country has had a dramatic increase in gang-rapes of Finnish women. Mr. Holappa spoke out against these attacks of his countrywomen. Mr. Holappa’s political opinion was twisted by Finnish authorities to be interpreted as racist and anti-immigrant, when in fact, Mr. Holappa’s political opinions are anti-crime and anti-criminal immigrants—not racist.
On January 16, 2007, Mr. Holappa was detained by the Finnish police. His apartment was ransacked by police and his belongings thrown on the floor. They went to his parent’s house, where Mr. Holappa had once lived and searched there as well. They told his mother he had been arrested and that he was “in trouble” and warned her that if he pursued his political opinion, he would “not have any place in our society.” He was detained for a total of three days. The first day was spent in a concrete room with lights burning 24 hours straight. He was told he was suspected of writing an article and sending a picture on the Internet. He was moved into a cell and held for an additional 2 days before being released without actually being charged.
Upon his release, it was discovered that the Finnish press released his name to the public stating that he had written a discriminatory article in December 2006, a fact which is false and has never been proven to be true. The article denounced gangs of rapists still roaming the city [of Oulu], accusing him of being a webmaster of an American web site and claimed he committed a copyright violation by sending a clipped newspaper photo to a friend.
In May 2008, he received a call from a police woman asking when he could to the police station as they had “dug up” his case again. On May 20, 2008, she called him again and told him he was to be indicted for “incitement of racial hatred”, “defaming the honor of the African community of Finland ”, and “copyright violation….”

I followed this with my 6 April American Free Press article about Henrik Holappa:

Federal Goons Hate
Henrik; Go After Him

William B. Fox

Evidence continues to mount that the arrest on March 9th of Finnish asylum seeker Esa Henrik Holappa near Pittsburgh , Pa. by Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) police was politically motivated. A visitor to see Holappa at the Buffalo , NY detention center on March 16th reports that Holappa was kept in solitary confinement, denied access to books, and blocked from phoning individuals considered “white nationalists.”
ICE officials still have not publicly released charges. However, a volunteer attorney verified that they are political. The attorney also filed papers on March 20th to prevent Holappa’s venue from being changed from Pennsylvania to NewYork, which could have made it easier for the government to deport him back to Finland .
According to the visitor, ICE officials stated to Holappa “‘We know you are a white supremacist,’ They asked questions like, ‘How would you view an Obama assassination? How do you feel about racemixing and the Holocaust?’”
Holappa claimed that ICE officials told him after he was arrested that his charges involved his political connection with white activists and “radical” publications.
In his affidavit filed with his asylum application in Oct 2008, Holappa feared that he could face up to 4.5 years of imprisonment in Finland for speech considered legal in America . After Holappa mentioned that the culprits of gang rapes upon Finnish girls were black Africans in a statement on the Internet, local police condemned him for “inciting racial hatred” and “defaming the honor of the African community.” 

Holappa was seized without publicly released charges.
During the Bush administration, another important case is worth mentioning  where a suspected “enemy combatant” was seized and held for five years in America without any charges at all!
This becomes all the more chilling if one accepts our premise that “Al Qaeda” is largely a phony, agents provocateur-type Mossad-CIA construct, as is the so-called “Global War on Terror.”  It reminds one of the witch hunts of the Middle Ages where cruel treatment was piled upon phony charges which in turn were piled on scientifically unsupportable theology.
The Feb 27, 2009 article “Fox News’ Shep Smith: `This is America ; you do not get to hold people for five years without’ charges” by Ben Armbruster discussed a specific case:

Today, a federal grand jury formally charged Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri — the only “enemy combatant” held inside the United States — “with two counts of providing material support to al Qaeda.” This afternoon, Fox News host Shepard Smith briefly veered off the Fox reservation and expressed outrage that al-Marri has been imprisoned for five years without any charges being filed against him:
SMITH: He has been held in a military prison for more than five years — not Chris Wallace — this next person. And he wasn’t ever charged. Think about that. I mean just think about it fundamentally. You are held for five years in prison, and you’re never charged! Oh well it was an al-Qaeda suspect, suspected al-Qaeda operative. Who cares who it is?! You don’t get to — this is America ; you do not get to hold people for five years without — actually, you do. But he’s getting its day in court now.
Watch it:
Indeed, bringing charges against al-Marri in a civilian court represents “an abrupt change in policy from the Bush administration” which “had argued that he could be held indefinitely without being charged.” Attorney General Eric Holder said today that the indictment “shows our resolve to protect the American people and prosecute alleged terrorists to the full extent of the law” and that the Obama administration “will hold accountable anyone who attempts to do harm to Americans, and we will do so in a manner consistent with our values.”

Actually, things can get even worse than this third step in which American citizens are seized and held without charges for “political crimes.”
The fourth step took place in Bolshevik-run Russia where tens of millions people were seized by secret police and sent to the GULAG where they perished.
And yes, it can happen here.  In fact it, it is already beginning to happen.
This segues back to Captain May, who as usual was way ahead of virtually everyone else back in the fall 2006- spring 2007 time frame in reading ominous forward-looking indicators.
Ominously, when the Orwellian-named “Patriot Act” (as if it is “patriotic” to suppress the Constitution in the name of fighting wars for Israel ) came up for five year renewal in late 2006, it was renewed by Congress.  Furthermore, the Bush administration refused to completely do away with torture.
In his October 2, 2006 Iconoclast article “King George Bush and the Tortured Truth” Captain May noted:

The Republican-dominated Congress has countered recent U.S. judicial branch attempts to limit the power of George W. Bush, whom his Neocon enablers call a "unitary executive," which his opponents translate as "dictator." Thanks to their efforts this week, he will soon no longer need to submit to the check and balance of judges; instead he will be free to rely on his own unchecked, imbalanced judgment. He will be able to engage in domestic spying, torture tactics, interminable internment or military kangaroo courts against those he accuses of terrorism, and he will be able to accuse anyone he wants, whether they be foreigners or U.S. citizens.
Legal scholars point out that these most undemocratic powers will defeat the U.S. constitution by demolishing its first and fourth amendments, and wreck the American Revolution by subjecting us to the whim of a new King George. Going further, they point out that the Cowards Congress has even given up habeas corpus, the salutary notion extracted by the English from King John on the field of Runnymeade in 1215.
In reply to their immediate protest — and in anticipation of protests to come — Attorney General Alberto Gonzales warned a Georgetown judiciary conference Friday that federal judges had better learn their place in this brave new world of the "war president," and had better not buck his war-time dictates. Bush chose Gonzales well, knowing that he would need a Torquemada when he wanted to torture.
With great and abiding loyalty — to dictatorship, not democracy — the U.S. media has avoided all unkind recollection of the systematic torture exported from Gitmo to Abu Ghraib in 2003. Likewise they’ve avoided mentioning the allegations of Seymour Hersh, who broke the story of Abu Ghraib’s war crimes in 2004, that the torture was ordered and protected by the Bush administration. This campaign of omission has effectively stopped the public from even considering that we just may have a sadistic leader, one who strongly believes in the terror of torture, and sells the policy by saying he only wants to torture terrorists.

Twice-Told Truths

My interest in the Bush modus operandi is far more than merely academic, even though I learned the most about it because of my beloved mentor, Dr. Peter W. Guenther, from whom I studied classics and art history from him at the University of Houston before leaving college for a career in military intelligence and public affairs. He warned me about a man who had used the destruction of a national icon to establish new, radical powers of "protection" for the nation.
Dr. Guenther was most uncomfortable about five-year emergency powers — continued after the five years was over — and the establishment of a new national police force to guard the homeland. He abhorred the virulent "with us or against us" nationalism that defied both international opinion and international forums. He was horrified by the appearance of a government that accused those who disagreed with the new nationalism of treason, then began to set up prison camps for its enemies, where torture policies and torture chambers taught guards to become torturers. He swore that such a regime was designed by war profiteers and dedicated to world conquest.
He never tired of saying all this over and over, without doubt. For my part, I never thought to doubt him, because he had seen it all before. You see, like me, Dr. Guenther had been a soldier, but unlike me, he had not served in the U.S. Armed Forces; rather, he had served in the German Wehrmacht, from 1939 - 1945. Born in 1920, he had seen each and every detail of the description above in his youth, beginning after the "German 9/11," which they called the Reichstag Fire.
He didn’t at all think it coincidence that his second country, the United States , had taken on the appearance of his first country, Germany . He thought that the parallels were intentional, and that we were in the grips of a Fourth Reich, designed to carry out a Third World War. He didn’t think there was a dime’s worth of difference between Bush and Hitler, or between what Hitler’s helpers called the Propaganda Ministry and what Bush’s helpers call a patriotic media. In short, he wasn’t particularly shocked by anything that was recurring. In his best professor’s fashion, he explained to me that it’s hard to be shocked by anything you’ve already seen before, and that even a quite scary movie isn’t quite so scary the second time around. No, he wasn’t particularly shocked, but he was profoundly saddened.
Dr. Guenther and I had many revealing talks about comparative politics and military history when I was publishing my early war analysis, written for the Houston Chronicle, and it was thanks to his clear vision that I was confident when I predicted that we would lose the war in Iraq and likely end up in a world war. Those predictions seem obvious to readers in 2006, but they were outlandish enough to end my career in the mainstream shortly after I wrote them in 2003. The media in which I had been regarded as one of the brightest — including NBC and The Wall Street Journal — blackballed me as too radical.
My mentor chuckled paternally at my professional plight and advised me to regard it as a high compliment to be called radical when the truth was that I was simply right when my nation’s leader was wrong. Before he died, worn out with current events as much as the cares of age, he agreed with me that I should continue to write the truth about our times and trouble, even if it meant living in the underground and writing for the Internet. Whenever I think of Dr. Guenther I always feel a pang, believing that part of the cause of his death was an acute case of deja vu brought on by our association and shared analysis.

Truth and Consequences

In these last three years of underground writing, I’ve announced my work to my former commanders in the U.S. military as a mission of conscience, and in payment for that bit of patriotism have been threatened by a long list of officials, on behalf of a long list of agencies and armed services. An Army colonel at Ft. Stewart , Georgia , threatened me with death for investigating the truth about the Battle of Baghdad, which is what was really happening the weekend the media broadcast the propaganda of the Private Jessica Lynch rescue. An Air Force lieutenant colonel in Florida , who boasted of being a war planner, threatened me with prison for publishing the same Battle of Baghdad on line in late 2003. The Houston FBI threatened me with prosecution for predicting a market-busting explosion at British Petroleum’s refinery in Texas City — I said it would happen on March 31, 2004, and it happened 24 hours earlier (like 9/11, it was an inside job). Even the police at my alma mater took their shot — or rather, promised it — when I reported that my wife had received a death threat from Army officers in its ROTC Department.
At present I’m under official attack by the U.S. Army’s Signal Corps through its on line propaganda magazine, Signaleer. It accuses me of being the Lord Ha Ha and Tokyo Rose of the anti-Bush crowd, and has also gone after two prominent members of my group of compatriots dedicated to opposing the Bush League war of lies, Ghost Troop. The first, U.S. Ambassador Chase Untermeyer, served as the Ghost Troop chaplain from 2003 - 2006, while the second, Sergeant First Class Donald Buswell, is an active-duty Ghost Troop who questions the official 9/11 story. The recriminations against me and mine haven’t always been mere words, though: Sergeant Buswell nearly died of a pulmonary embolism within a month of joining Ghost Troop, something we believe was an assassination attempt. After surviving the embolism, he was soon put under investigation by his superiors at Ft. Sam Houston’s Fifth Army in Texas , charged with disloyalty for asking questions and associating with others, like me and Ambassador Untermeyer, who do the same. I have reported both the assassination attempt and the administrative retaliation against Sergeant Buswell to the U.S. Army’s Inspector General, who has done nothing to protect him, but at least hasn’t issued threats or made assassination attempts in response to my entreaties.
Not that particular threats by the Department of the Army could distress those of us who dissent any more than the actions of Congress have done in these last days. The Cowards Congress has engaged in collective dereliction of duty in preparing to assign dark powers of terror to the man who stands behind all the men I’ve mentioned above. Without Congressional assent, there wouldn’t be the many petty officials who have each been in dereliction of their duty in innumerable small ways, each doing his best to suppress truth and inquiry into truth at all costs, by any means necessary.
George W. Bush, who has long accused those of us who disagree with him of rendering aid and comfort to the enemy, will soon have a blank check to arrest and incarcerate us, and subject us to treatment that only he and his Neocons enablers would deny is torture. Whenever I think of Dr. Guenther, I recall a scholar and soldier of rare degree and pedigree, one who hated all that was false and uninspired, and whom I shall always strive to emulate. I’m glad my mentor didn’t lived to see the full obscenity of our shoddy imitation of the original under which he lived and served, our chutzpah Hitler, with his Neocon Neonazis and his Republican Reich.

In this article, Captain May points out how anyone who suspects government insiders of foul play can themselves become suspected terrorists.   In his interview on the Jeff and Mike Show in Jan 2008, Capt May observed just about everything he has talked about could potentially cause him to wind up in Guantanamo Bay .
The September 7, 2006 article: “White House Targets Conspiracy Theorists As Terrorist Recruiters” by Paul Joseph Watson  observed:

A document cited by President Bush in his recent speech at the Capital Hilton Hotel on how to 'win the war on terror' cites conspiracies as one of the wellsprings of terrorism and threatens to "address" and "diminish" the problems they are causing the government in fulfilling their agenda.
On Tuesday Bush referred to the strategy paper as "an unclassified version of the strategy we've been pursuing since September the 11th, 2001," that takes into account, "the changing nature of this enemy."
The document says that terrorism springs from "subcultures of conspiracy and misinformation," and that "terrorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories. The distortions keep alive grievances and filter out facts that would challenge popular prejudices and self-serving propaganda."
The terminology echoes President Bush's speech (video below) to the UN General Assembly on November 10th 2001 in which he stated, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty."


White House Targets Conspiracy Theorists As Terrorist Recruiters
'Strategy for winning the war on terror' says world contaminated, corrupted by misinformation

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison | September 7 2006

A document cited by President Bush in his recent speech at the Capital Hilton Hotel on how to 'win the war on terror' cites conspiracies as one of the wellsprings of terrorism and threatens to "address" and "diminish" the problems they are causing the government in fulfilling their agenda.

On Tuesday Bush referred to the strategy paper as "an unclassified version of the strategy we've been pursuing since September the 11th, 2001," that takes into account, "the changing nature of this enemy."
The document says that terrorism springs from "subcultures of conspiracy and misinformation," and that "terrorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories. The distortions keep alive grievances and filter out facts that would challenge popular prejudices and self-serving propaganda."
The terminology echoes President Bush's speech (video below) to the UN General Assembly on November 10th 2001 in which he stated, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty."





This is an outright threat to the 9/11 truth movement and is meant to have a chilling effect on freedom of speech.

It is also a callous reminder that the administration that has been the progenitor of the most heinous and deliberate campaign to mislead and lie to its own people is so transfixed by its own hubris that it has the temerity to accuse others of propagating deceptive information.

This is the same administration that deliberately included the Niger yellow cake fraud in a state of the union speech to sell a war - knowing that the information was completely bogus.

How dare they threaten us with the very defining characteristic of their black legacy and equate us with terrorists?

This is a direct assault on the alternative media and a continuation of the twilight zone rhetoric that saw the administration attempt to link its critics with Fascists and Hitler appeasers. The only fascists that should really concern us are not imaginary 'Blogofascists' or 'Islamofascists' but the Neo-Fascist slugs that occupy the White House and their cheerleading sycophants in the mainstream media and congress.

This is by no means the first time political enemies of the state have been smeared as terrorist sympathizers.

Alex Jones' 2001 documentary film 9/11: The Road to Tyranny featured footage from a FEMA symposium given to firefighters and other emergency personnel in Kansas City in which it was stated that the founding fathers, Christians and homeschoolers were terrorists and should be treated with the utmost suspicion and brutality in times of national emergency.

We have highlighted previous training manuals issues by state and federal government bodies which identify whole swathes of the population as potential terrorists. A Texas Department of Public Safety Criminal Law Enforcement pamphlet gives the public characteristics to identify terrorists that include buying baby formula, beer, wearing Levi jeans, carrying identifying documents like a drivers license and traveling with women or children.

A Virginia training manual used to help state employees recognize terrorists lists anti-government and property rights activists as terrorists and includes binoculars, video cameras, pads and notebooks in a compendium of terrorist tools.

Shortly after 9/11 a Phoenix FBI manual that was disseminated amongst federal employees at the end of the Clinton term caused waves on the Internet after it was revealed that potential terrorists included, "defenders of the US Constitution against federal government and the UN, " and individuals who "make numerous references to the US Constitution." Lawyers everywhere cowered in fear at being shipped off to Gitmo.

In May we broke the exclusive of a nationwide FEMA program which is training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for a declaration of martial law, property and firearm seizures, and forced relocation.

In Oct 2006, President Bush signed Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122). As noted by journalist Michel Chossudovsky, this "included a specific section on the role of the Military in national emergencies. Section 1076 of this legislation entitled `Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies' allows the President of the United States to deploy the armed forces and the National Guard across the US, to `restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States' in the case of `a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency.'"
All of this was bad enough, but George Bush’s implementation of National Security Presidential Directive 51 on May 9th was even more ominous for many reasons.
First, it made perfectly clear to anti-false flag activists how any kind of declared national emergency, to include natural disasters and alleged bird flu epidemics, could become a pretext for full scale martial law and dictatorship.
Secondly, for those who understand American history from the perspective of Dr. Kevin  Gutzman’s Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution, the mere idea of the chief executive arbitrarily assigning himself dictatorial powers under contingency circumstances with out first going through Congress, a Constitutional amendment process, or discussion with other representatives of the people is an absolute outrage. 
One paper which clearly grasped this outrage in its May 24, 2007 editorial was the Chattanoogan:

Bush Makes Power Grab - And Response
posted May 24, 2007

President Bush, without so much as issuing a press statement, on May 9 signed a directive that granted near dictatorial powers to the office of the president in the event of a national emergency declared by the president.
The "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive," with the dual designation of NSPD-51, as a National Security Presidential Directive, and HSPD-20, as a Homeland Security Presidential Directive, establishes under the office of president a new National Continuity Coordinator.
That job, as the document describes, is to make plans for "National Essential Functions" of all federal, state, local, territorial, and tribal governments, as well as private sector organizations to continue functioning under the president's directives in the event of a national emergency.
The directive loosely defines "catastrophic emergency" as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."
When the President determines a catastrophic emergency has occurred, the President can take over all government functions and direct all private sector activities to ensure we will emerge from the emergency with an "enduring constitutional government."
Translated into layman's terms, when the President determines a national emergency has occurred, the President can declare to the office of the presidency powers usually assumed by dictators to direct any and all government and business activities until the emergency is declared over.
Ironically, the directive sees no contradiction in the assumption of dictatorial powers by the President with the goal of maintaining constitutional continuity through an emergency.


Interestingly enough, the passage of time has only validated the concerns expressed by the Chattanoogan.  See, for example, the Glenn Greenwald article “The newly released secret laws of the Bush administration” written nearly three years later:  

This is factually true, with no hyperbole:  Over the last eight years, we had a system in place where we pretended that our "laws" were the things enacted out in the open by our Congress and that were set forth by the Constitution.  The reality, though, was that our Government secretly vested itself with the power to ignore those public laws, to declare them invalid, and instead, create a whole regimen of secret laws that vested tyrannical, monarchical power in the President.  Nobody knew what those secret laws were because even Congress, despite a few lame and meek requests, was denied access to them.  What kind of country lives under secret laws?

This crucial question about what kind of country lives under secret laws is exactly what motivated the constituents of Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio, to press this member of the House Homeland Security Committee to full probe  NSPD-51. 
The results were alarming, as noted in Capt. May’s July 31, 2007 article: “Peter DeFazio and the Portland Nuke

Prayers for Portland

An effective grassroots movement is growing in Oregon , and it has pushed Congressman DeFazio in the right direction. Early summer anxiety by his constituents concerned him little, as he then issued assurances that all was on the level with pending federal terror exercises, and the recently enacted National Security Presidential Directive 51, which allows Bush to establish a dictatorship if there is a catastrophic natural event or terror attack.
DeFazio’s assurances didn’t convince his constituents, though, and soon they didn’t even convince him. Just to make sure that everything was on the level with NSPD-51, he asked to see the secret annexes of the document. This was his right as a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, and in his 20 years in Congress he had never been refused access to classified documents.
There’s a first time for everything, though. After initially granting DeFazio permission to check into NSPD-51, the White House reversed itself on 7/18/07, and refused to let him take a look. Friday, DeFazio, along with House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bernie Thompson and Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Chris Carney, sent a letter to the White House. In it, they demand the access so far denied DeFazio — or a written explanation as to why access has been refused — by Thursday. This is the day before Congress — and Congressman DeFazio — recess and return to their home districts to answer emphatic questions.
Portland has more than a prayer if it and the rest of Oregon keep up the pressure on their local, state, and national leaders. At this stage of the Bush regime and its terror-driven global war, there’s no shame in conspiracy theory, since it’s the only theory that offers consistent, coherent answers to our growing secret government and its terror policies.

Significantly, Portland and Seattle would become the new target zone after Houston and Chicago, for reasons we explain in the next chapter.
Portland also happened to be close to where I lived in Vancouver , WA during this period.  After serendipitously coming across Captain May’s works on the Internet, I immediately understood the danger. 
I had no particular desire to get showered with fall out.
Admittedly, this was not the first time in America history that a President made a power grab and engaged in highly destructive behavior.  For example, I was very familiar with the Abraham Lincoln’s excesses outlined in the “King Lincoln” archive at, where Lincoln shut down thousands of newspapers, threw tens of thousands of dissenters in jail, and effectively acted like a dictator while promulgating the bloodiest war in America ’s history.
The Woodrow Wilson administration sanctioned a scary move during World War I where it encouraged any suspected pro-German books to be removed from public libraries. 
I was also very familiar with President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s  strong arm tactics towards dissenters.  For example  the Barnes Review article “A Mockery of Justice—The Great Sedition Trial of 1944” by Michael Collins Piper described how Roosevelt arranged a lengthy nuisance trial for dissidents on the traditional American conservative right.
However, in regard to dealing with the Bush cabal, I felt that  this go around the stakes were much greater.  A failure to oppose this evil could ultimately result in World War III global nuclear annihilation or a completely enslaved population controlled by implanted microchips.
Having lived in New York City for ten years and been surrounded by Jews, I felt that I understood their general character well enough comprehend the modus operandi of Zionist neo-cons.  I had also been following alternative media since the late 1980s’ and was well aware of the trends that motivate their often paranoid, desperate, and deceitful  behavior. 
I called up Captain May and asked his opinion about the odds Portland might become a major target.   I explained that the idea that Zionist neo-cons might want to nuke a Pacific Northwest city as part of a false flag operation to justify war with Iran was not shocking to me at all.  In fact, to the contrary, I explained that if anything it would be quite unsettling to my view of the world if they didn’t want try something utterly diabolical like this.
Captain May and I hit it off right away.    


Update References:

2010-08-02 Top Secret America: A Washington Post investigation
[Washington Post Editor's Note:]
"Top Secret America" is a project nearly two years in the making that describes the huge national security buildup in the United States after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. | Read More »
2010-07-19 America's secret army: how the 'war on terror' created a new industry; Since 9/11, US intelligence numbers have gone through the roof – and the budget is three times as high by Ed Pilkington,
...A new survey of the intelligence network created in the wake of the 9/11 attacks estimates that some 854,000 people have been given high-level clearance, making James Bond look decidedly everyday.
The estimate comes from the Washington Post which has dedicated a team of reporters to a two-year project on what it calls "Top Secret America"
In addition to the army of individuals, it has identified some 1,271 government bodies and 1,931 private contractors working on counter-terrorism.
The creation of this extraordinary spider's-web of intrigue can be dated back to 16 September 2001, a week after the attacks, when George Bush announced from Camp David the launch of what he called a "war on terror". The war would take a while, he warned, and the American people would have to be patient, but he was determined.
What he didn't warn the American people was that nine years later that war would have spawned a gigantic proliferation of agencies and spending unparalleled in US history..."
2010-04-07 US Confirms: Citizen Is on CIA Assassination List: New Mexico Cleric Awlaki May Be Killed With Impunity, Officials Insist by Jason Ditz
2009-12-23 Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother Part 1 of 6


Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory - Big Brother Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5 Big Brother Premiered Wed, December 23, 2009 at 10P Big Brother is watching and it's not who you think. Jesse Ventura's investigation of government surveillance on its citizens tears the lid off a nationwide program that is thought to turn local businessmen and office workers into spies, snooping on their neighbors and ratting on their friends in exchange for information and special privileges from the FBI- including, some charge, a "license to kill."


2010-03-10 20 Signs That The United States Is Rapidly Becoming A Totalitarian Big Brother Police State by Michael Snyder - BLN Contributing Writer
2007-10-24 Endgame Rips The Lid Off Elite's Final Masterplan New documentary delves into the darkest recesses of the global elite Steve Watson,

Endgame by Alex Jones





Forward to Chapter 24
Back to Chapter 22
Books I-III Summary Table of Contents

Short URL for this web page:

Flag carried by the 3rd Maryland Regiment at the Battle of Cowpens, S. Carolina, 1781

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.