Starting with first principles and the scientific method
America First Books
Featuring ebooks that find a truer path in uncertain times

William B. Fox Archive
Mission of Conscience Book I Contents



Chapter 12

The Bush Cabal Resurgence,
Bin Laden-Hussein Fakery,
and Making the Next Terror Prediction

First posted May 2009
Last updated 15 Aug 2012


But who is Osama bin Laden really?
Let me rephrase that. What is Osama bin Laden?

He’s America’s family secret. He is the American President’s dark doppelganger. The savage twin of all that purports to be beautiful and civilised. He has been sculpted from the spare rib of a world laid to waste by America’s foreign policy; its gunboat diplomacy, its nuclear arsenal, its vulgarly stated policy of "full spectrum dominance," its chilling disregard for non-American lives, its barbarous military interventions, its support for despotic and dictatorial regimes, its merciless economic agenda that has munched through the economies of poor countries like a cloud of locusts. Its marauding multinationals who are taking over the air we breathe, the ground we stand on, the water we drink, the thoughts we think.

Arundhati Roy
The Algebra of Infinite Justice

[Hat tip to Depleted Uranium: The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War by Leuren Moret, World Affairs – The Journal of International Issues, 1 July 2004]

Going into the Presidential election season of November 2004, the Bush cabal continued to deal its sordid bag of tricks.
First, we learned more about Bush’s “personal ego before country” selfishness in the article: “Two Years Before 9/11, Candidate Bush was Already Talking Privately About Attacking Iraq, According to His Former Ghost Writer” by Russ Baker published Oct 28, 2004.

"He was thinking about invading Iraq in 1999," said author and journalist Mickey Herskowitz. "It was on his mind. He said to me: 'One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief.' And he said, 'My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it.' He said, 'If I have a chance to invade, if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I'm going to have a successful presidency." Herskowitz said that Bush expressed frustration at a lifetime as an underachiever in the shadow of an accomplished father. In aggressive military action, he saw the opportunity to emerge from his father's shadow. The moment, Herskowitz said, came in the wake of the September 11 attacks. "Suddenly, he's at 91 percent in the polls, and he'd barely crawled out of the bunker."

Next, the Bin Laden Jack-in-the-box popped out on Friday, Oct 29, 2004, less than a week before the Presidential election. This was the first Bin Laden video since the Iraqi invasion, and the fourth since 9/11.
Captain May later commented in his 19 Jan 2006 Cracking Satan’s Code interview (hr 1), “One year after 9-11, I believed in Bin Laden and Al Qaeda the way when I was eight years old I believed in Santa Claus and Rudolf.”
As we shall see, quite a few independent Internet researchers, to include Joe Vialls and Captain May, were not buying the Bin Laden “Santa Claus” story this go around –and for good reason.

Bin Laden on Al Jazeera
29 Oct 2004

On 30 Oct BBC News ran the story titled “Bin Laden Threatens America ” It began:

Arabic TV station al-Jazeera has aired a videotape in which Osama Bin Laden threatens fresh attacks on the US.
The leader of the al-Qaeda network says the reasons behind the events of 11 September 2001 still exist.
Americans go to the polls in four days, but Bin Laden says their security depends on neither George W Bush nor John Kerry, but on US foreign policy.
The rivals both reacted angrily to the tape, and both vowed they would stand up to the threat posed by Bin Laden.

Bush huffed: “We're not going to let any terrorist influence our election." Righteous indignation, indeed, coming from some suspected of vote fraud and theft of the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections.
Interestingly enough, Bush’s popularity had taken a hit four days earlier on Monday, 25 October. The New York Times and CBS reported that 380 tones of high-grade explosives were missing from the al Qaqaa munitions compound in Iraq . Democratic candidate John Kerry accused the Bush administration of incompetence.
According to Wikipedia, after the Bin Laden Tape was released:

Ron Suskind noted that the CIA analysis of the video led them to the consensus view that the tape was designed strategically to help President Bush win reelection in 2004. Deputy CIA director John E. McLaughlin noted at one meeting, "Bin Laden certainly did a nice favor today for the President." Suskind quoted Jami Miscik, CIA deputy associate director for intelligence, as saying "Certainly, he would want Bush to keep doing what he’s doing for a few more years."[4] The same speculation has been made by Bahukutumbi Raman.[5]
Public response
The 2004 tape boosted the popularity of American President George W. Bush. President Bush opened up a six-point lead over his opponent Senator John Kerry in the first opinion poll to include sampling taken after the videotape was broadcast.[6]

Former CBS anchor Walter Conkrite commented on Larry King Live that he viewed the Bin Laden episode as a manipulation:

CRONKITE: …So now the question is basically right now, how will this affect the election? And I have a feeling that it could tilt the election a bit. In fact, I'm a little inclined to think that Karl Rove, the political manager at the White House, who is a very clever man, he probably set up bin Laden to this thing. The advantage to the Republican side is to get rid of, as a principal subject of the campaigns right now, get rid of the whole problem of the al Qaqaa explosive dump. Right now, that, the last couple of days, has, I think, upset the Republican campaign.

Despite the fact that the real Bin Laden had very serious kidney problems in 2001 that required frequent dialysis, the Bush administration continued to pedal fantasies about an Al Qaeda mastermind deftly evading spy satellites and troop sweeps somewhere in the caves and hills of the Afghanistan-Pakistani border. It maintained a $25 million reward for Bin Laden’s capture throughout the Bush presidency.
Quite a few stories contradicted the establishment party line, for those who bothered to look.
In the documentary Fahrenheit 451 by Michael Moore we learn about how Osama and other members of the Bin Laden family were business associates of the Bush family. During the war in Afghanistan against Soviet occupation, Osama Bin Laden was directly supported by the CIA. Members of the Bin Laden family were quietly allowed to slip out of America immediately following 9-11.
Hameed Gul, the former head of Pakistan's version of the CIA, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), told interviewer Alan De Borchgrave that the Mossad, and not Osama bin Laden, was behind the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya:

Mossad is strong in both countries. Remember the Israeli operation to free hostages in Entebbe (Uganda)? Both Kenya and Tanzania were part of the logistical tail. A so-called associate of Osama was framed at Karachi airport. The incidents took place on Aug. 8, 1999, and on the 10th a short, clean-shaven man disembarks at Karachi airport and presents the passport of a bearded man. Not your passport, he was told. He then tries to bribe the clerk with 200 rupees. A ludicrously small sum given the circumstances. The clerk says no and turns him in and he starts singing right away. Not plausible. Osama has sworn to me on the Koran it was not him and he is truthful to a fault. Pious Muslims do not kill innocent civilians who included many Muslim victims. The passport must have been switched while the man was asleep on the plane in what has all the earmarks of a Mossad operation. For 10 years, the Mujahideen fought the Soviets in Afghanistan and not a single Soviet embassy was touched anywhere in the world. So this could not have been Osama's followers.

In his 17 Nov 2003 article “Bush Administration Knew the Whereabouts of Osama” Michael Chossudovsky stated:

If the CBS report by Dan Rather is accurate and Osama had indeed been admitted to the Pakistani military hospital on September 10, 2001, courtesy of America's ally, he was in all likelihood still in hospital in Rawalpindi on the 11th of September, when the attacks occurred. In all probability, his whereabouts were known to US officials on the morning of September 12, when Secretary of State Colin Powell initiated negotiations with Pakistan, with a view to arresting and extraditing bin Laden.
A recent Reuters report (11/13/03; scroll down) quoting Labeviere's book "Corridors of Terror" points to alleged "negotiations" between Osama bin Laden and the CIA, which took place two months prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks at the American Hospital in Dubai, UAE, while bin Laden was recovering from a kidney dialysis treatment
Enemy Number One in hospital recovering from dialysis treatment "negotiating with CIA"?
The meeting with the CIA head of station at the American Hospital in Dubai, UAD was confirmed by a report in the French daily newspaper Le Figaro, published in October 2001. (See Alexandra Richard, at

Contrary to the impression left by the 29 Oct 2004 video that Bin Laden was behind 9-11 and would likely do it again, independent web journalist Joe Vialls reported a different story straight from Bin Laden’s mouth:

In the weeks after 9/11, a Pakistani newspaper published an interview with "Osama bin Laden" in which we find the following denial of any role in 9/11:
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States . As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. . .
. . .there are intelligence agencies in the US , which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year.
This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Osama and Taliban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance.
I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the US Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat.
In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks
. (Ummat, Karachi, September 28, 2001)"

According to former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, an important reason why Bin Laden did not orchestrate 9/11 is because he was working for the CIA right up until 9/11. According to the July 31, 2009 blog post "Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US till 9/11":

Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman (audio, partial transcript).
In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained 'intimate relations' with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, "all the way until that day of September 11."
These 'intimate relations' included using Bin Laden for 'operations' in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These 'operations' involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner "as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict," that is, fighting 'enemies' via proxies.
As Sibel has previously described, and as she reiterates in this latest interview, this process involved using Turkey (with assistance from 'actors from Pakistan, and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia') as a proxy, which in turn used Bin Laden and the Taliban and others as a proxy terrorist army.
Control of Central Asia
The goals of the American 'statesmen' directing these activities included control of Central Asia's vast energy supplies and new markets for military products.
The Americans had a problem, though. They needed to keep their fingerprints off these operations to avoid a) popular revolt in Central Asia ( Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan), and b) serious repercussions from China and Russia. They found an ingenious solution: Use their puppet-state Turkey as a proxy, and appeal to both pan-Turkic and pan-Islam sensibilities.
Turkey, a NATO ally, has a lot more credibility in the region than the US and, with the history of the Ottoman Empire, could appeal to pan-Turkic dreams of a wider sphere of influence. The majority of the Central Asian population shares the same heritage, language and religion as the Turks.
In turn, the Turks used the Taliban and al Qaeda, appealing to their dreams of a pan-Islamic caliphate (Presumably. Or maybe the Turks/US just paid very well.)
According to Sibel:

This started more than a decade-long illegal, covert operation in Central Asia by a small group in the US intent on furthering the oil industry and the Military Industrial Complex, using Turkish operatives, Saudi partners and Pakistani allies, furthering this objective in the name of Islam.

In the article “Did the US really let bin Laden get away? Bush, Cheney continue to deny Kerry charge that they let the Al Qaeda leader escape in 2001.” Christian Science Monitor, Oct 27, 2004, author Matthew Clark reported criticism made by U.S. Presidential Democratic Candidate Senator John Kerry, namely:

“…US forces could have killed or captured bin Laden when they had him trapped in the mountains of Tora Bora in 2001, but bungled the operation because they did not have enough troops on the ground and `outsourced’ the job to Afghan warlords.”

The article “Bush Had No Plan to Catch Bin Laden After 9/11” by Gareth Porter, Sept 30, 2008, reinforces Kerry’s charge. Porter states:

New evidence from former U.S. officials reveals that the George W. Bush administration failed to adopt any plan to block the retreat of Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders from Afghanistan to Pakistan in the first weeks after 9/11.
That failure was directly related to the fact that top administration officials gave priority to planning for war with Iraq over military action against al-Qaeda in Afghanistan .
As a result, the United States had far too few troops and strategic airlift capacity in the theater to cover the large number of possible exit routes through the border area when bin Laden escaped in late 2001.
Because it had not been directed to plan for that contingency, the U.S. military had to turn down an offer by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in late November 2001 to send 60,000 troops to the border passes to intercept them, according to accounts provided by former U.S. officials involved in the issue.

In “Damn it! Bin Laden died five years ago,” posted 25 Oct 2007 author Richard L. Franklin provides a plausible reason why Bush did not bother to seal off Bin Laden in Afghanistan . Bin Laden was on his death bed in an American hospital in Dubai the whole time! Franklin commented on an English translation of Osama Bin Laden’s obituary published December 26, 2001 in an Egyptian newspaper:

…. A person such as bin Laden, who was constantly in movement and was hauling around his own dialysis machines along with generators and fuel for the generators is a person doomed to die fairly soon. It is therefore not surprising that bin Laden died of kidney failure not long after 9/11.
You might find it interesting that bin Laden spent the last months of his life in an American hospital in Dubai . At one time, one could find posted Net testimonies by various people who had visited him in the hospital during the last months of his life. I only know of one site that has survived an apparent purging by the powers that be and is still providing the truth about bin Laden's final days, his death, and his burial. It includes an Egyptian obituary plus leads to sundry other related articles. (I append the Egyptian obituary and the site URL.)
Keep in mind, that some officials within the CIA were quite fond of bin Laden and felt that the US owed him a great debt of gratitude for his important role in ousting the Russians from Afghanistan; so it is no grand surprise that the CIA made a real effort to make the last months and weeks of his life as comfortable as possible.
A long time ago, I sent my subscribers his obituary as it appeared in a major Egyptian newspaper. Mind you, bin Laden obituaries appeared all over the Middle East . Among the leaders of state, General Musharraf of Pakistan publicly announced bin Laden's death, a statement that has since disappeared from the Net and which Musharraf no longer acknowledges. He now plays along with the US claim that bin Laden is hiding somewhere on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan .
I have read three different obituaries from Arabic papers. (In each case, the Arabic versions were printed next to English translations.) These seem to have disappeared from the Net with one exception, an item I hereby enclose. The facts are simple. He was buried in a secret, unmarked grave with a simple ceremony and about three dozen supporters in attendance…
… There is one last website that offers true information about bin Laden's death plus leads to related sites and information.
To wit:

Translation of Funeral Article in Egyptian Paper: al-Wafd, Wednesday, December 26, 2001 Vol 15 No 4633
News of Bin Laden's Death and Funeral 10 days ago
Islamabad -
A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa'da organization, stating that bin Laden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death. The official, who asked to remain anonymous, stated to The Observer of Pakistan that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial in Tora Bora 10 days ago. He mentioned that 30 of al-Qa'da fighters attended the burial as well as members of his family and some friends from the Taleban. In the farewell ceremony to his final rest guns were fired in the air. The official stated that it is difficult to pinpoint the burial location of bin Laden because according to the Wahhabi tradition no mark is left by the grave. He stressed that it is unlikely that the American forces would ever uncover any traces of bin Laden.

In subsequent years, other sources would either effectively confirm Bin Laden’s death, raise doubts about his still being alive, or show an amazingly blasé attitude towards catching him.
According to “Press secretary to the president of Pakistan tells ABC Osama bin Laden will not be captured if he agrees to live 'peaceful life' “ by Ron Brynaert, September 5, 2006:

“Major General Shaukat Sultan Khan, press secretary to the president of Pakistan, tells ABC News that -- if found -- Osama bin Laden won't be arrested, as long as he promises to behave like a `peaceful citizen.’”

Former Pakistani Prime minister Benazir Bhutto stated Nov 2, 2007, shortly before her assassination at the end of 2007, that Osama Bin Laden was murdered. (See also her video). Unfortunately her Al Jazeera interviewer did not bother to ask when she thought he was killed. Nor did she disclose her sources.
In September 2006 there was a leaked intelligence document suggesting that Bin Laden may be dead. An MSNBC story responded:

PARIS - President Jacques Chirac and Saudi officials said Saturday that information contained in a leaked intelligence document raising the possibility that Osama bin Laden may have died of typhoid in Pakistan last month is “in no way whatsoever confirmed.”

Interestingly enough, Russia ’s Vladimir Putin commented “that leaks can be ways to manipulate. `When there are leaks ... one can say that (they) were done especially.’”
Then we have the story about Omar, one of Bin Laden’s sons, who married a British woman. He told the press in 2007 that he had no contact with his father since 2000, and that the Bin Laden who appeared in a September 2007 video was an imposter.
Joe Vialls provided a photographic analysis to show that the 29 Oct 2004 Bin Laden video was also a fake:

Certainly facial features can change with the gaining or losing of weight or illness, but certain things don't change and one of them in a man is the beard line. The first picture is bin Laden when he was well. Note the end of his nose, the distance between that and the tip of the beard "V" at his lip. Note the area under the lower lip where no beard grows. (Caption by Joe Vialls).

This is a photo after his hospitalization in Dubai when he is obviously very sick. Notice that the beard pattern is exactly the same using the same points of reference I indicated with the orange lines (caption by Joe Vialls).

The photo from this latest tape shows a very different beard pattern. The other different feature you will notice is, in the first 2 pictures the tip of the nose dips below the nostrils. In the phony, the tip and nostrils are aligned. The nose continues to grow, and as one ages the tip would tend to dip, not shrink (caption by Joe Vialls).

Conclusion: This is not bin Laden. Therefore, I assume it is a Rovian October Surprise meant to rally voters to Bush's side (caption by Joe Vialls).

In his 26 Jan 2006 interview with Zeph Daniel and Capt. Jeff Cross, Captain May observed that every time George Bush talked about Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, he always seemed to have a self-knowing little smirk on his face.
“Don’t you get the joke?” said Capt. May. “George Bush is Osama Bin Laden! He is Al Qaeda!”
Some satirists and cartoonists took this joke a step further by showing facial line-ups that paralleled Osama Bin Laden with Michael Chertoff, Bush’s arch-Zionist director of the Department of Homeland Security. Were it not for the fact that so many trillions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives were getting wasted, this might actually be funnier than “Elvis sightings.”



Here is some humor:  How to get “Osama Bin Chertoff?” Easy. Instructions: First remove the turban. Then shave some beard. Dye the hair white, and guess who is hiding out “in plain sight” at the top echelon of the Bush Administration?




Please recollect that during the first Texas City mission described in Chapter 10, Capt. May described how the higher up the FBI chain of command he went, the more likely he was to encounter uncooperative, politicized agents. In Sept. 2008, former Naval Intelligence Officer Wayne Madsen described how Bush was happy to use corrupt elements of the FBI as well as a fictitious Bin Laden to get reelected:

September 3, 2008 -- FBI's role in 2004 election fraud revealed

As concerns increase about another fraudulent presidential election in the wake of two previous engineered elections in 2000 and 2004 through the use of pre-programmed electronic voting and vote tabulation machines, WMR has been informed by a high-level Democratic Party official in Ohio that the FBI was involved in throwing Ohio's 20 electoral votes to the Bush-Cheney column in 2004, denying the state to John Kerry, and as a result, keeping George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in the White House for another four years.
Our Ohio sources report that in the weeks before the 2004 election, the FBI assigned Stanley Borgia, an native and former agent for the Ohio Attorney General's Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation before joining the FBI in 1984, was assigned as the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Cincinnati Division. The assignment was a plum job for Borgia after he served as Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Buffalo Division, where he supervised the investigation of the so-called "Lackawanna Six," six Yemeni-Americans from the Buffalo area who were charged with being members of an Al Qaeda "sleeper cell." However, those familiar with the case revealed the six traveled to Afghanistan but became so fearful of what they encountered in the Taliban-controlled country they wanted to return immediately to the United States. However, the successful prosecution of the "Lackawanna Six" raised Borgia's visibility with certain members of the Bush administration who saw him as useful for other operations, namely the 2004 presidential election in Ohio
As the FBI's top man in Cincinnati , Borgia, who also previously served as Toledo Resident Agent in the Cleveland Division, cast a blind eye to reports of criminal activity involving the vote in various southern and central Ohio counties within the jurisdiction of the Cincinnati FBI Division. These included a reported FBI lock down of the Warren County administration building election night because of a false FBI terrorist threat received. Reporters were barred from observing the vote count during the security lock down. In addition, the FBI failed to investigate evidence of election fraud in Butler, Montgomery, Franklin, Hamilton, and Miami
counties that involved undervotes for the presidential candidate, "spoiled" ballots, and suspicious activities of voting machine technicians working for companies like Diebold and Triad that were financially and politically linked to the Republican Party.
Borgia was not permitted to testify at hearings on Ohio's 2004 election fraud that were held by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, in both his capacity as Chairman and ranking member.
On May 2, 2006, Borgia was rewarded with his inaction in investigating documented election fraud, federal criminal violations, and appointed by FBI Director Robert Mueller as Deputy Assistant FBI Director where he was assigned to be Director of Intelligence for the Department of Energy where he is responsible for nuclear security; counterintelligence for Energy Department facilities around the country.
Borgia has received the Attorney General's Award for Exceptional Service and the Service to American Medal for Homeland Security.

As an aside regarding Borgia's new nuclear security duties, it is worth noting evidence that this area is as big a joke as the integrity of presidential election ballot counts. In his 29 Aug 2005 American Free Press article "Guess Who's In Charge Of Guarding U.S. Nuclear Power & Weapon Sites," Michael Collins Piper reported: "American supporters of Israel were delighted to learn that an Israeli company, Magal Security Systems, owned in part by the government of Israel, is in charge of security for the most sensitive nuclear power and weapons storage facilities in the United States. The largest perimeter security company in the world, Magal started out as a division of Israeli Aircraft Industries (IAI), which was owned in part by the government of Israel. In recent years, however, Magal evolved into a publicly traded company, although IAI (and thus the government of Israel) still holds a substantial share in the highly successful firm. What this means is that the government of Israel will have control over the security of America’s nuclear weapons."
The fun and games regarding another possible false flag attack escalated to an even more dangerous level when on November 12th the Drudge Report came out with the following headline:

CBS '60 MINUTES' BOMBSHELL INTERVIEW ON Sunday, November 14, 2004:

Osama bin Laden now has religious approval to use a nuclear device against Americans, says the former head of the CIA unit charged with tracking down the Saudi terrorist. The former agent, Michael Scheuer, speaks to Steve Kroft in his first television interview without disguise to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Nov. 14 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

Scheuer was until recently known as the "anonymous" author of two books critical of the West's response to bin Laden and al Qaeda, the most recent of which is titled IMPERIAL HUBRIS: WHY THE WEST IS LOSING THE WAR ON TERROR, Brassey's, Inc, August © 2004, ISBN# 1574888498, $27.50.

No one in the West knows more about the Qaeda leader than Scheuer, who has tracked him since the mid-1980s. The CIA allowed him to write the books provided he remain anonymous, but now is allowing him to reveal himself for the first time on Sunday's broadcast; he formally leaves the Agency today (12).

Even if bin Laden had a nuclear weapon, he probably wouldn't have used it for a lack of proper religious authority – authority he has now."[Bin Laden] secured from a Saudi sheik...a rather long treatise on the possibility of using nuclear weapons against the Americans," says Scheuer. "[The treatise] found that he was perfectly within his rights to use them. Muslims argue that the United States is responsible for millions of dead Muslims around the world, so reciprocity would mean you could kill millions of Americans," Scheuer tells Kroft.

Interestingly enough, a 31 Oct 2005 Wall Street Journal article titled “Baggage Claim: The myth of `suitcase nukes.’" by Richard Miniter, created doubts about the existence of the alleged nuclear weapons used by the Bush cabal scare scenario:

….The foundation of all main nuclear suitcase stories is a string of interviews given by Gen. Lebed in 1997. Lebed told a visiting congressional delegation in June 1997 that the Kremlin was concerned that its arsenal of 100 suitcase-size nuclear bombs would find their way to Chechen rebels or other Islamic terrorists. He said that he had tried to account for all 100 but could find only 48. That meant 52 were missing. He said the bombs would fit "in a 60-by-40-by-20 centimeter case"--in inches, roughly 24-by-16-by-8--and would be "an ideal weapon for nuclear terror. The warhead is activated by one person and easy to transport." It would later emerge that none of these statements were true.
…Lebed's onetime deputy, Vladimir Denisov, said he headed a special investigation in July 1996--almost a year before Lebed made his charges--and found that no army field units had portable nuclear weapons of any kind. All portable nuclear devices--which are much bigger than a suitcase--were stored at a central facility under heavy guard. Lt. Gen. Igor Valynkin, chief of the Russian Defense Ministry's 12th Main Directorate, which oversees all nuclear weapons, denied that any weapons were missing. "Nuclear suitcases . . . were never produced and are not produced," he said. While he acknowledged that they were technically possible to make, he said the weapon would have "a lifespan of only several months" and would therefore be too costly to maintain.

Unfortunately the author of this work not qualified to provide a conclusive opinion about whether any genuinely militant Al Qaeda operatives do or do not possess suitcase nukes. Indeed, there might be only a handful of people in the entire whole world within a few intelligence services who can provide definitive answers.
However, either way this issue is largely academic. Al Qaeda is largely a Mossad-CIA creation. If Mossad-CIA wants to run a false flag operation with a nuke, they will figure out a way to supply one to Al Qaeda if it does not have one already. Conversely, if Al Qaeda already has a nuke, it is probably so heavily infiltrated and monitored by Mossad-CIA that it is unlikely that it would ever be able to effectively use the nuke without Mossad-CIA acquiescence.
There is one other important area of Info War fakery that needs to be addressed in this chapter.


Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist (Documentary) - 2 Caption: "Part One of the Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist documentary from The Corbett Report, dealing with the founding and funding of what we know as Al Qaeda. This installment of the documentary goes into Zbigniew Brzezinski, Operation Cyclone, the ISI-CIA-MAK-US government funding circle and CIA connections to Osama Bin Laden."


The “Saddam” put before the
show trial.  Note lower teeth.



Saddam Hussein was allegedly captured on 14 Dec 2003. He was later put through extensive show trials and then hung.
Joe Vialls, Dr. James Fetzer, and other researchers have provided compelling evidence that this man was simply one of Saddam Hussein’s “doppelgangers” and that this whole episode was just one more Bush cabal hoax.
Dr. Fetzer posted the following article at his web site: “The `Mission Accomplished’ Fiasco: Saddam was Dead, but Killing Him was Illegal, Scholars Maintain

James Fetzer, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, has announced his finding that "Mission Accomplished" had to be modified to conceal that, even though Saddam Hussein had been killed, it was an illegal act and therefore had to be suppressed. An evaluation of the available evidence suggests that the celebration aboard the aircraft carrier, USS Abraham Lincoln, on May 1, 2003, was intended to announce the assassination when it was belatedly realized to have been in violation of a series of Presidential Executive Orders.
While taking out Saddam and liberating Iraq have often been cited as the official mission of US forces after the alleged existence of WMDs was exposed as fraudulent, it now appears that the capture, trial, and death of "Saddam" was yet another fraud, a hoax perpetrated by substituting one of his doubles for the deceased.
According to Fetzer, the evidence of the use of a Saddam double is abundant and compelling.
As long ago as July 3, 2004, the Australian journalist, Joe Vialls, reported that the captured "Saddam" was not the real Saddam, based upon differences in their teeth and jaw.
Saddam had excellent teeth and an overbite, while "Saddam" had bad teeth and an under bite, claims he substantiated with photographs.
(See, for example, "Shaddam Shaddam's New Vaudeville Scam!")
He had reported that Saddam's wife, Sajida Heiralla Tuffah, had reluctantly been granted access to the prisoner in Qatar , but emerged asking, "Where is my husband?"
"That Saddam's wife denied this was her husband bothered me enough to take a look at the evidence myself," Fetzer said.
He located official photos from the US military to use as a basis of comparison, which substantiated the claims advanced by Vialls and published an article, "When is Saddam not Saddam?" (July 15, 2004), offering corroborating evidence.
"Although I was sure this was a double, I was not certain why the substitution had been effectuated.
That is not something that would become apparent until I had the opportunity to speak with Yvonne Wachter on April 11, 2007, as my guest on 'The Dynamic Duo,' a radio program I co-host with Kevin Barrett."
Yvonne Wachter, the mother of B-1 bomber pilot, Capt. Chris Wachter, had a profoundly troubling story to tell. According to her, our intelligence agencies had been able to pin-point the location of Saddam and his sons, Uday and Qusay, at the Al-Sa'ah Restaurant in the Mansour District of Baghdad.
This had been possible because all three of them were using British-made Racal Jaguar cell phones, which Saddam had had made in order to insure the confidentiality of his communications. But that also meant there were experts who were well positioned to intercept those calls.
(For the transcript and other links, go to "New Studies" at
According to Yvonne, her son was piloting his B-1 bomber in the vicinity of Baghdad and received urgent orders to head back to the city.
"This is the big one," he was told.
General Tommy Franks, who was monitoring those cell phone calls from CENTCOM, ordered him to "triple check" his co-ordinates and to not miss.
"At two minutes out," she said, "Capt. Wachter confirmed with CENTCOM (under command of General Franks and General T. Michael Moseley) that the target was still in place and that they were ready to drop and he was told, 'Don't miss.'
The bombs were dropped and immediately upon the bombs hitting the ground, the cell phone conversations abruptly ended and the phones went dead."
The munitions were four Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs (JDAMs).
When they returned to their base, she added, the crew was met with cheers. "Sometime during the night after they had gone to bed, my son was awoken by his commanding officer and summoned quickly to a makeshift telecommunications center with the Pentagon," Yvonne explained. "The Pentagon had ordered my son and his fellow crew members to do a live-feed interview from in-theater because, as his commanding officer told him, 'You got him.
You got Saddam and his two boys."
Capt. Wachter was interviewed on CNN and his name, his bombardier's name and his CO's name were broadcast worldwide. He was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross and even Vice President Cheney would later confirm Saddam's death.
On April 13, 2003, Yvonne said, United Press International reported, "Last Wednesday we went out on a limb in UPI analysis and concluded the evidence that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was already dead, his foul physical body obliterated last Monday by the four 2,000 pound bunker-busting bombs unloaded on him courtesy of the U.S. Air Force.
The 'wicked witch' is indeed dead."
Al-Jazerra on the same day headlined an article, "Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein has been killed during the night of 7-8th as the result of a bombing raid on the Al-Mansour District of Baghdad."
As many commentators have observed, the "Mission Accomplished" event on the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003, had a surreal quality about it.
The president flew aboard a fighter onto the deck, complete with military pilot's uniform, and boasted that "major combat operations" had already ended, just a few weeks after our intervention.
In spite of the news reports, nothing was said about having taken out Saddam.
One week later, in The Baltimore Sun, "Cheney says he believes Hussein is dead" (May 8, 2003), Vice President Cheney was quoted, "I think we did get Saddam Hussein. He was seen being dug out of the rubble and wasn't able to breathe."
On May 25, 2003, Capt. Wachter spoke at Dr. Robert Schuller's Crystal Cathedral in Garden Grove , CA , and reiterated what his commanding officer had said to him:
"Seriously, you got Saddam and his two sons."
The next day, Yvonne said, he received an urgent order to fly overnight to Langley to meet with the heads of the Air Force in a secret meeting.
When he returned, he said to his mother, "I was told the whole world owes me and my crew a debt of gratitude, but the rest of what I was told must remain classified.
However, it looks like Saddam got away."
He was shattered, distraught, and clearly acutely distress. Which motivated Yvonne to figure out exactly why. "
As she explained during our interview," Fetzer said, " she had noticed that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had not been speaking out about the death of Saddam, which she found very odd.
Pursuing the thought that perhaps he knew something the others did not know, she discovered he had been Secretary of Defense in the administration of Gerald Ford during the Church Committee investigations into abuses by the CIA, which had lead to the President's signing Executive Order 11905 banning the assassination of foreign leaders of sovereign nations. Saddam fell exactly into that category."
Indeed, Section 5G of that directive states, "No employee of the United Stated government shall engage in or conspire to engage in political assassinations." Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan would reaffirm that directive and make its provisions even more explicitly. Donald Rumsfeld, Yvonne observed, was Reagan's Special Envoy to Iraq and was photographed shaking hands with Saddam in 1983.
"There is nobody who knew better about the Executive Order ban on political assassinations than Mr. Rumsfeld."

Small wonder, then, that Joe Vialls reported in his 18 June 2004 article “Mrs. Saddam Says Saddam is Not Saddam” that a meeting of next-of-kin pressured by the Russians was a total disaster.

There is little doubt that the International Red Cross really screwed the White House last week, when demanding that America release "prisoner-of-war Saddam" when "sovereignty is returned to Iraq at the end of June". The possibly catastrophic results of handing an imposer back to the Iraqi people, all of whom can tell the difference between President Saddam Hussein and one of his body doubles at close range, had American Administration officials wringing their hands in panic, while seeking a less-than-lethal compromise.
Leading the charge was American-appointed Iraqi Dictator Paul Bremer, due to be replaced on 1 July by American-appointed Iraqi Dictator Iyad Allawi. Bremer has a very personal interest in the proceedings, because if all of Baghdad's residents should uncover the deception, and rise up in rage to attack his splendid dictatorial residence in the Green Zone, Paul will unquestionably be castrated while still alive, shortly before being returned to New York with his privates sewn neatly inside his mouth.
Dictator Bremer announced America's intent to keep the imposter away from public view by referring obliquely to the incoming puppet government: "If they ask for him, which I have every reason to believe they will ... we'll turn him over," Bremer told the Washington Post, adding that "legal custody and physical custody can be two separate things".
Instantly proving that the pliable puppets have no intention of asking for 'Saddam' to be released at any time in the future, American-appointed Justice Minister Malek Duhan al-Hassan stepped in, insisting that American assistance was necessary. "Saddam Hussein will be under our responsibility after June 30 but we can ask the coalition to provide additional support to guard him for an undetermined period of time."
Liberally oozing obsequiousness from every sweat gland in his corrupt body, al-Hassan continued, "We are ready to guarantee the protection of Saddam Hussein, but given the difficult security situation and if we feel we have the need, we can cooperate on this question with the coalition." Presumably then, we can take all this as meaning that the imposter will remain down in Qatar , playing poker with his attentive CIA minders.
Although just about anyone with eyes could tell that the knock-kneed man hiding in his custom-designed funk hole was not the real Saddam Hussein [full report linked at the bottom of this page], the Americans got away with the false-flag public relations stunt until April of this year, when disaster approached in the formidable person of Sajida Heiralla Tuffah, Saddam's wife and the mother of his children.
After the Russians applied enormous diplomatic pressure, America was finally obliged to allow Sajida Heiralla Tuffah access to her husband in Qatar , where he had been flown in some luxury aboard a United States Air Force VIP jet. The facilities at Baghdad Airport were considered to be sub-standard, besides which, people were beginning to talk about the laughing and bourbon-swilling Muslim prisoner, who was the only one in sight not wearing a hood and sensory deprivation earphones, and not being sexually abused by Ricardo Sanchez.
Well, you could have heard a pin drop all the way across Qatar . Sajida arrived from Syria with her official escort Sheikh Hamad Al-Tani, and then entered the prison, emerging only moments later pink with rage and shouting, "This is not my husband but his double. Where is my husband? Take me to my husband".
American officials rushed forward to shield Mrs Saddam from perplexed Russian observers, trying to insist that Saddam had changed a lot while in custody and she probably didn't recognise him. This was certainly not the best way to handle the Iraqi President's wife. "You think I do not know my husband?" Sajida shouted furiously, "I was married to the man for more than twenty-five years!" Then she stormed off, never to return.
This remarkable confrontation was reported by Pravda and four other newspapers in the east between 13 and 17 April, but the New York Times and others made damn sure you didn't read or hear about it in the west. After all, this was an integral part of Wall Street's psychological campaign to convince the public that America was "Winning the War", so please to send more sons and body bags to Iraq.
Sometimes it is difficult to remember how thin the ice really is in Iraq, because Wall Street relies heavily on the limited memory-span of most readers and viewers, successfully thinking that each new exciting and thus distracting Orwellian lie it presents to the public, overwhelms the one before it, and so on.
The entire "war" and its lack of progress is simply a giant public relations exercise, artfully managed by some of the best spin-doctors and media forgers in New York . So every now and again it pays to go back to the roots of the deception, if only to remind ourselves how badly we have been fooled…

Another important Info War milestone in November 2004 was the continued national media cover up of Israeli role in America’s brutal occupation of Iraq, and their continued intrigues and efforts to viciously reduce the local population, much as they were busy reducing Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.
The bloodthirsty subjugation of Fallujah was fomented by screams for vengeance against all “rag heads” by Jewish neo-cons continually broadcast across America . Some top Jewish neo-cons included Michael Savage (aka Michael Wien), Mark Levin, Michael Medved, Wolf Blitzer, and Charles Krauthammer. High up there also on the Zionist media food chain were plenty of Shabbos Goyim collaborators (Shabbos Goyim is Yiddish for gentiles who do house cleaning dirty work for Jewish employers on Jewish holy days). Michael Collins Piper’s The Judas Goats identifies a number of these highly compromised fellow whites, such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Bill O’Reilly, and Ann Coulter who added an illusion of urbane WASPiness or Irish Catholic rectitude to Zionist screechings.
The 22 Nov 2004 article “ Israel 's Battle in Fallujah” by Rashid Khashana , Al-Hayat, described some of the hidden Israeli influence:

It has become clear that Israel played a major role in the battle for Fallujah, despite the American concern to conceal this fact. What news leaked of officers, soldiers, and even rabbis of dual citizenships that took part in the battles, some of which were killed by the resistance's bullets, is only the tip of the iceberg. The killing of an Israeli officer in Fallujah exposed the existence of a large number officers, snipers, and paratroopers in Iraq . Based on Israeli press statistics, Israel currently has no fewer than 1,000 officers and soldiers scattered around the American units working in Iraq…
…the Israeli role is neither technical nor complementary to the American plan. Rather, it is part of the vision established by its military and political leadership prior to the launching of the war, which aims at annulling any regional role for Iraq and eliminating any threat it might cause to its future. The Israeli plan became clear due to various headlines, most prominent of which is dispatching Mossad operatives to establish offices and networks in the north, south, eliminate the Iraqi scientists and intensify the real estate purchase of property and land in the north; specifically in Arbil, Kirkuk and Mosul . This comes as a completion of the previous project, launched ten years prior to the fall of Baghdad , through Jewish Turks.
…In conclusion, it is possible to say that the Likudniks, who control decision-making posts in America , are using Bush's campaign against terrorism as a cover-up to accomplish Israel 's objectives in Iraq . Hence, the purpose of the Fallujah battle is to break the backbone of the resistance and pave the way for the completion of the Israeli plan.


Fallujah after extensive demographic and structural
remodeling by the blood-thirsty Bush-Mossad cabal.


The second Battle of Fallujah in November did indeed turn into an orgy of destruction against innocent civilians and complete razing of most parts of the city. Ironically, national media failed to report the extent of American savagery towards Iraqis. It also under reported the level of resistance across Iraq. According to “The Razing of Fallujah Fails To Break Iraqi Resistance”:

…The city is in ruins, laid waste by thousands of tonnes of American shells, missiles and bullets. Fallujah’s population has been turned into refugees inside their own country, with an estimated 120,000 living in shanty towns and tents in and around the town of Amiriyah, and another 100,000 taking refuge in Baghdad and other cities.
Some four weeks after the assault was launched, however, the claim that this atrocity would intimidate Iraqis and end support for the armed resistance is refuted by what is taking place across Iraq. The slaughter in Fallujah has done nothing to stem the fighting against the US occupation. Hundreds of Iraqi interim government troops, police, officials and mercenary contractors have been killed or wounded over the past month, while American military casualties in December are running at an average of over two killed and 25 wounded every day.
Most attacks on US forces go unreported. Bombings, mortar strikes and ambushes are daily occurrences in Baghdad , with the targets ranging from the Italian embassy to the Green Zone fortress that houses the US embassy and the offices of the interim government…

There are quite a few tragic ironies and twists of fate involved here. Prior to the first Battle of Fallujah, I saw a news report about how Marines in the area were given courses in Iraqi culture and even told to grow mustaches to blend in better with the local population. The Marines had enjoyed some success with its Combined Action Platoon program in Vietnam, where Marines lived among the common people. Many Marine leaders were apparently listening to the advice of military analyst William S. Lind about the right way to go about conducting “4th Generation Warfare.” Lind pointed out how politics usually trumps everything else in such situations, and the use of heavy-handed force is counter productive for winning hearts and minds. In fact, according to Lind, a British Army officer observed that an important reason why the British Army enjoyed success in Northern Ireland is that it practiced self-restraint in handling the local population, even to the point of being willing to accept more casualties than it was inflicting on the Irish Republican Army.
Then all of a sudden all of this wisdom went out the window, and the Marines were ordered to romp and stomp and shoot ‘em up in Fallujah, which is exactly what they did. According to reports by journalist Jahr Jamail, some Marine snipers picked off innocent civilians, to include ambulance drivers, just like the way Israeli soldiers have been known to sadistically pleasure themselves with Palestinian men, women, and children back in Gaza and the West Bank .
Similarly, the U.S. Air Force ran air strikes on civilian areas. One does not to be an expert in 4th generation warfare theory to figure out that this extremely barbaric form of local law enforcement tends to incur the wrath of the local population over the long run. But then again from the selfish vantage point of many careerists, if it brings ribbons and promotions, and enables defense contractors to test new hardware in order to stay competitive for more Congressional appropriations, why not?
As previously discussed, U.S. Army intelligence units tortured Iraqis, also a standard practice in Israel . Later, in late 2008, Vice President Dick Cheney admitted that he approved this practice. In Chapter 10, we discussed Sgt. Frank "Greg" Ford, former counterintelligence agent in the California National Guard's 223rd Military Intelligence (M.I.) Battalion in Samarra , who stated that the use of torture did much more to dry up intelligence sources and alienate the Iraqi population than help. Worse yet, according to a May 2004 International Red Cross report, NATO intelligence officers confirmed that up to 90 percent of Iraqis arrested by the American military are taken by mistake. Hence, most individuals who were tortured were innocent.
Interestingly enough, when this author went through Marine Corps Interrogation of Prisoner of Warfare school in the early 1990’s, he was told that the kinds of methods used by German interrogator Hans Joachim Scharf in World War II, explained in the book The Interrogator, by Col. Raymond F. Toliver, were the best way to go. Scharf never used torture, and nevertheless got everything he wanted out of about 500 captured allied pilots, with the exception of only about five individuals. So it certainly is not the case that intelligence professional within the Army and Marine Corps did not know any better, just like back during that period most of Captain May’s superiors agreed that occupying Iraq could produce a quicksand war over the long term.
U.S. Army units were also ordered to send trucks with loudspeakers into Afghan villages and deliberately insult the Taliban in an effort to allegedly draw them out for a fight. According to one YouTube video, they even deliberately desecrated the corpses of Muslims believed to be insurgents to goad their adversaries.
Given that neither the Army nor Marines ever had even a fraction of the manpower necessary to hold down Afghanistan against a hostile population, deliberately insulting Muslims to stir up the hornet’s nest even further is an unbelievably stupid and self-defeating policy. After all, while the Taliban may be considered extreme by many portions of the Afghan population, they are still “home town boys” who serve an alter ego function, and whenever non-Muslims insult them, there is a little bit of the redneck and hillbilly inside every Afghan that feels some resentment. Furthermore, the CIA supported the Taliban in their war against Soviet occupation, so why should Americans do a 180 degree reversal? Lastly, the Taliban had eradicated 90% of Aghan’s opium production, whereas Bush was turning Afghanistan into the worlds greatest opium and heroin producer. In short, everything about Bush’s policies created suspicion, distrust, and even contempt.
As confirmation of the foolishness of the Taliban-bashing campaign, the insurgency continually grew throughout this period. More and more transportation routes to the capitol Kabul got sealed off, so that by late 2008 there was only one road left and over 75% of the country was in Taliban hands.
Meanwhile back in Iraq , as the insurgency also got out of hand, the Bush administration eventually decided to bribe various Iraqi factions to stop fighting. This could backfire, since the bribe money could make Iraqi militias that much stronger when the day comes that they decide to fight Americans again. But then again, the Bush administration was always more interested in faking appearances to gain short term political points rather than achieving real and enduring results.
Interestingly enough, viewed from a cockeyed perspective, all of this could indirectly correlate with developments that help the situation. If after bribing Iraqis, Americans hole up at their bases and quit running search operations of civilian areas and air strikes that antagonize the local population, that that in itself might help reduce tensions. It may also distract Iraqis by giving them some funds that help focus them on rebuilding their country.
As a final irony, we also started to see news reports about American officials yearning for the good old days under Saddam Hussein when there was vastly more stability in Iraqi society, and wondering how they might re-install the same kind of state they crusaded to overthrow.
America ’s meandering, incompetent, and often self-defeating military policies only begin to make sense once one understands that the U.S. military served an utterly crooked, incompetent, and treasonous Bush-Mossad cabal, joined at the hip with an equally corrupt national media allied in waging Info War against the American public.
We saw similar patterns in southeast Asia during the Vietnam era, as described in books such as The Ugly American, A Nation of Sheep, Sarkhan, and Our Own Worst Enemy written by William J. Lederer and Eugene Burdick in the late 1950’s and 1960’s. The military industrial complex, State Department bureaucracy, and other unlimited Federal government entities habitually put selfish departmental interests and incompetent central planning ahead of the long term national interest. This is one reason why we went into our “Why We Fight” discussion in Chapter in Chapter Six to give the reader a sense about how deep structural problems help drive America’s dysfunctional foreign policy and military adventurism. So long as we have the “Orwellian, neo-Jacobin, Zionist-dominated, multi-racial, multi-cultural, global superstate that wages perpetual war for perpetual peace” that apes the social models of imperial Rome and Babylonia, combined with Zionist elite in charge of national media and the central banking system, all of these problems will endlessly persist until Americans finally completely overhaul their government or else let external forces resolve their destiny for them, such as through break up, complete economic break down, or take over by foreign powers.
On Dec 10, 2004, Congress passed Patriot Act II. This created even more anxiety among members of Ghost Troop. Citizens for Legitimate Government noted that:

9/11 Measure Expands Police Powers --Intelligence Bill Includes Disputed Anti-Terror Moves --The intelligence package that Congress approved this week includes a series of little-noticed measures that would broaden the government's power to conduct terrorism investigations, including provisions to loosen standards for FBI surveillance warrants and allow the Justice Department to more easily detain suspects without bail. ['Little-noticed' measures??? No, we *noticed* them --the GOP media whores refused to *cover* them!!]
Anti-[pro] terror bill worries liberties groups --People indicted on terror charges will have a much harder time getting free on bail under a provision in the new intelligence bill. The provision also broadens the government's authority to spy on terror suspects.
Congress expands use of terrorist watch lists --Anyone who works at an airport or aboard a cruise ship will have his identity checked against government watch lists, just like commercial airline passengers.
Permanent jail set for Guantánamo --Even as federal judges weigh whether the U.S. has the authority to detain and try suspects in the war on terror, the Pentagon is quietly planning for permanency at the U.S. detention center at Guantánamo Bay , The Herald has learned.

After Bush got re-elected in November, Captain May thought for sure that his minions would come after him. May became inactive. As Captain May recounted in his Lone Star Iconoclast interview on 14 Aug 2006:

My wife and I have both been death-threatened, repeatedly, because of the mission. After Bush was returned to power in the 2004 elections, I went to a Jesuit priest, with whom I counseled for months, trying to find a reason to escape the mission. I found to my surprise, though, that he believed I should stay with it, no matter what it cost me. Still, I dropped out of the info-war for six months, then only returned after the London 7/7 bombings made it obvious to me that there would soon be another attack against the U.S. , and I had to dedicate myself and my unit, Ghost Troop, to stopping it. The Jesuits baptized me after I made that decision, figuring that I might not come out of the mission alive. Like anyone who has ever taken a mission, though, I’ve learned not to think about it too much. Still, I keep the emergency baptismal certificate framed as a sign of where things have gone with our country. It’s a sad time when telling the truth is risking your life.” (Leon Smith 14 Aug 2006).

On 14 Feb 2005 former Lebanese Prime Minister and billionaire Rafik Hariri died when a bomb exploded in a road underneath his traveling limousine.
Joe Vialls commented in “Zionists Nuke Downtown Beirut - Again! In a desperate attempt to slow down their forthcoming defeat in Palestine, Jewish Special Forces micro-nuke former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, then instruct western media outlets to falsely blame the atrocity on Syria” 16 Feb 2005.

The powerfully armed motorcade of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri was no match for the micro nuke that erupted from below Beirut 's gleaming Corniche. The blast was so huge that it blew out windows more than one kilometer away, and ripped apart the Mercedes motorcade vehicles like toys. Young men clawed at debris to help rescue workers reach bodies trapped underneath.
"Everything around us collapsed," a Syrian worker at the site said. "It was as if an earthquake hit the area." Facades were ripped from luxury buildings and cars set ablaze on streets carpeted with rubble and broken glass. Officials confirmed 15 dead [in the motorcade] and at least 100 injured. So advanced was the bomb, security sources said, that it defeated jamming equipment so hi-tech that Hariri's passing motorcade would interfere with cell phones and televisions…
…. "The bomb was placed underground, especially (since) the crater was so huge," said Hisham Jaber, a retired brigadier general and former professor at the Lebanese Military and Staff Command College . "Even a car with 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds) of TNT wouldn't create such a crater."
Jaber, who inspected the assassination site but is not part of the investigation, said a suicide attack was the least likely cause of the explosion. He noted the crater was near the middle of the road, indicating the bomb was likely placed under the street and not in a parked car.
Suspicion that the bomb was under the street increased Friday when the chief military investigator demanded that police investigate recent road works in the area. Jaber said that although Hariri's motorcade had equipment to jam electronic transmissions, the device could have been circumvented by a wire-triggered bomb or a counter-device placed in a nearby vehicle.

Wayne Madsen reported in the 11 March 2005 Online Journal:

"According to high-level Lebanese intelligence sources—Christian and Muslim—former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri was reportedly assassinated in a sophisticated explosion-by-wire bombing authorized by the Bush administration and Ariel Sharon's Likud government in Israel.
There are also strong indications that the Hariri assassination was carried out by the same rogue Syrian intelligence agents used in the 2002 car bombing assassination of Lebanese Christian leader Elie Hobeika, who was prepared to testify against Sharon in a Brussels human rights court. That case involved the Israeli Prime Minister's role in the 1982 massacre by Israeli troops of Palestinian refugees at the Sabra and Chatilla camps in Beirut . The Hariri assassination used wire-bombing technology because Hariri's security personnel used electronic countermeasures to fend off a remote control bomb using wireless means.

Wikipedia noted other political effects: (March 2009)

Hariri's killing led to massive political change in Lebanon , including the Cedar Revolution and the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon.

This helped set up Lebanon for the summer 2006 Israeli invasion, which I will cover later.
On March 23, 2005, a major explosion ripped the BP plant in Texas City , Texas . This was unanticipated by Capt May. The AP news report came out as follows:

At Least 14 Dead in Huge Refinery Explosion; Workers Search Rubble for More Victims; More Than 100 Injured by PAM EASTON, AP

TEXAS CITY, Texas (March 23) - A thunderous explosion tore through a BP oil refinery Wednesday, shooting flames and billowing smoke into the sky and showering the area with ash and chunks of charred metal. At least 14 were believed dead and more than 100 were injured.
Eyewitnesses said the explosion was enormous. (Brett Coomer, Houston Chronicle / AP)
The cause of the explosion was not immediately known. Workers searched through rubble for survivors or bodies into Wednesday night, several hours after the 1:20 p.m. blast. An undetermined number of workers were unaccounted for; most of the injured suffered broken bones, cuts, concussions and other injuries. Refinery manager Don Parus said BP was waiting on an official death toll confirmation from the medical examiner's office, but added, ''it's my deep regret that we believe we have 14 losses of life.''
The blast left a gaping hole in the earth, mangled nearby offices, and was so powerful that witnesses said it rattled homes as far as five miles away. Cars and trucks in an employee parking lot were coated with soot and debris.
''It was real scary. Have you ever heard the thunder real loud? It was like 10 times that,'' said plant worker Charles Gregory, who was with several co-workers inside a trailer tank when the floor started rumbling.
The explosion occurred in a part of the plant used to boost the octane level of gasoline. BP spokeswoman Annie Smith said terrorism ''is not a primary focus of our investigation.''
The plant in Texas City , about 35 miles southeast of Houston , sprawls across 1,200 acres. About 433,000 barrels of crude oil are processed a day, producing 3 percent of the U.S. supply. The plant employs about 1,800 people in Texas City , a city of about 40,000 people.
Gasoline prices could rise slightly because of the explosion because the plant is such a large gas producer. Gasoline futures rose nearly 2 cents in late trading on news of the explosion.
The explosion caused panic in this oil town, with many residents fearing the worst as they awaited word on their friends and family members who work at the plant.
Within minutes of the explosion, officials ordered a ''shelter-in-place,'' meaning residents had to stay inside until authorities could be certain the air was safe. Children were ordered under their desks until the rumbling subsided.
Valerie Perez was among those standing outside the refinery fence, worried about her 18-year-old husband who works there and hadn't contacted her. Perez, who has a 3-month-old baby, said her husband always takes his cell phone to work. On Wednesday, he left it behind.
"I'm nervous,'' she said, holding back tears.
Wenceslado de la Cerda, a 50-year-old retired firefighter, said the blast shook the ground, rattled windows and knocked ceiling panels to the floor.
"Basically, it was one big boom,'' he said. ''It's a shame that people have to get killed and hurt trying to make a dollar in these plants, but that's part of reality.''
The plant and town have dealt with refinery explosions in the past.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration fined the refinery after two employees were burned to death by superheated water in September.
Another explosion forced the evacuation of the plant for several hours last March.
Afterward, OSHA fined the refinery $63,000 for safety violations, including problems with its emergency shutdown system and employee training.
Texas City is the site of the worst industrial accident in U.S. history. In 1947, a fire aboard a ship at the Texas City docks triggered a massive explosion that killed 576 people and left fires burning in the city for days.
"Welcome to life in Texas City ,'' Marion Taylor, 55, said Wednesday as she entered a convenience store shortly after the explosion. AP-NY-03-23-05 2309EST copywritten

Greg Szymanski wrote in his Jan 28, 2006 article regarding this incident:

British Petroleum (BP) Products North America Inc. issued its final corporate report last month, saying the March 23, 2005, fatal explosion killing 15 at its Texas City plant was the result of "management system failures and employee mistakes."
The company report, issued from its headquarters in Warrenville , Ill. , said management is accepting "total responsibility" for the massive explosion, adding plans are to modernize the plant to the tune of $1 billion over the next five years.
While BP admits liability, federal authorities are threatening civil and criminal lawsuits, as well as levying a record-setting fine that would make the $11 million fine levied by OSHA in 2005 look like chump change.
BP spokesman Ronnie Chappell said today the company is withholding comment about pending federal investigations but is cooperating thoroughly with authorities about BP wrongdoing in the explosion, leading to the 15 deaths and more than 180 injuries. Chappell also would not comment about the possibility of stiff fines being levied for the massive release of 30,000 pounds of toxic pollution related to the explosions.
The BP plant in Texas City also surfaced in the news recently as a former Army Intel Capt., Eric May, of Houston claims the March 23 explosion may have been a rehearsal for an upcoming terrorist attack at the plant.

Flash forward to the BP-Gulf Catastrophe of 2010, and this incident took on an even more horrifying dimension. According to the July 2, 2010 article Blast at BP Texas Refinery in ‘05 Foreshadowed Gulf Disaster by John Knutson, ProPublica and FRONTLINE (PBS):

TEXAS CITY, TEXAS -- Ever since the Deepwater Horizon exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, David Senko has been tallying the similarities between what he calls "my blast" in 2005 and this new BP disaster.
"His" blast erupted on a clear March afternoon at an antiquated BP refinery that sits on the southern edge of this small Texas town. It killed 15 people -- four more than died on the Deepwater Horizon -- including 11 contractors in a crew that Senko led at the site. Unlike the Deepwater Horizon, however, the effects of the 2005 blast were largely confined to Texas City, so the story of what happened there quickly slipped from the national news.
The Texas City disaster has taken on new relevance today, because the investigations that were done in its aftermath reveal so much about the company that is responsible for what's happening now in the Gulf. Government probes, court filings and BP's own confidential investigations paint a picture of a company that ignored repeated warnings about the plant's deteriorating condition and instead remained focused on minimizing costs and maximizing profits. According to a safety audit BP conducted just before the 2005 blast, many of the plant's more than 2,000 employees arrived at work each day with an "exceptional degree of fear of catastrophic incidents."

This article provides a valuable inside look at BP's corporate culture, which is heavily driven by greed and intrigue. The article describes how BP ruthlessly milked the refinery ever since it acquired it from Amoco:

The original refinery was built by Pan American Refining Corp. in the 1930s, and the facility has cycled through a string of owners since then. When BP took possession of the plant after the company's 1999 merger with Amoco, the refinery was losing money and in bad repair. Three times during the 1990s, Amoco had chosen not to make major upgrades that various reports said were needed. A staff recommendation in 1991 and an OSHA citation in 1992 specifically urged Amoco to replace the blowdown drums, a key part of the plant's antiquated safety relief system. The drums are a safety system of last resort; they are supposed to vent overpressurized chemicals into the atmosphere in case of an emergency.
Friction emerged during the merger, according to internal BP documents. BP had a reputation for turning quick profits, industry experts say, by wringing money from the companies it bought, while Amoco was considered more sensitive to the needs of its employees. In a 2000 report, BP had also put a $10 million price tag on a human life, something Amoco refused to do.
"BP embraced the principle that these costs can be specified for the purposes of cost benefit analysis," Robert Mancini, a member of BP's risk management team, wrote in a 1999 e-mail to other BP managers. "Amoco was generally unwilling to take this step. This is more a cultural issue than a technical one, but one that will have to be addressed."
Soon after the merger, BP demanded a 25 percent budget cut across all its U.S. operations.
Among the reductions at Texas City:

* Cut inspectors and maintenance workers by the dozens to save just over $1 million.
* Eliminate safety calendars: $40,000 in savings.
* Reduce purchases of safety shoes for employees: $50,000 in savings.
* Eliminate safety awards: $75,000 in savings.

Pat Nickerson, a former construction adviser at the plant, said in an interview that he noticed a steady degradation of safety culture and maintenance. When he mentioned his concerns to his bosses, he said they told him to "keep my mouth shut and don't worry about it."
According to a 2007 government investigation, BP dismantled Amoco's centralized health and safety management system and replaced it with a system that varied from operation to operation, a shift that investigators later said "resulted in a loss of focus on process safety."
In 2002, Don Parus, who had come up through the Amoco ranks, was transferred from BP's London headquarters to serve as a site director at the Texas City Refinery. One of the first things he did was hire an outside firm to do a safety audit. It found "serious concerns about the potential for a major site incident due to the large number of hydrocarbon releases (over 80 in the 2000-2001 [3] period)." It also found "mechanical integrity issues" and overdue inspections.
The report recommended $235 million in upgrades to the plant, but it is unclear whether they were made. Safety audits in 2003 and 2004 noted similar problems.
A year later, London again pressured Texas City to reduce its budget, saying the plant was eating up too much capital and not turning enough profit. In response, BP instituted the Texas City Refinery Repositioning Project. In an e-mail to BP staff about the project, Dennis Link, a manager at the plant, said the "key message" is that the refinery "is NOT delivering on profitability vs. % of capital investment. This is part of our 'sense of urgency.'"
New managers who arrived at the refinery were often shocked by the state of the facility. In an interview with BP's internal investigators, one described a "big old run down and dirty refinery" where "people were desperate for hope." Another manager, who had left the plant in 1995 and returned 10 years later, told investigators she was "appalled by the general state of disrepair," according to an internal BP investigation.
One new employee reported being laughed at when he suggested shutting down a unit after a three-quarter-inch fuel gas line blew out. "The mentality in refining is that the units are to continue running no matter what -- it's the cowboy mentality 'save the day,'" according to a 2006 BP investigation.
By 2004, Texas City had become BP's most profitable refinery, raking in more than $900 million in earnings. But BP wanted more.
At the close of the refinery's most successful year ever, London executives gave Parus, who had recently been named the site's business unit leader, a "budget challenge," asking him to slice $65 million from the plant's $300 million operating budget.
Parus declined to comment for this story, but according to a deposition he gave in connection with the 2005 explosion, he pushed back. After several rounds of negotiations, BP reduced the cut to $48 million.
By now, the years of neglect were catching up with Texas City, and Parus made that clear to BP executives Mike Hoffman and John Manzoni. In an emotional meeting in London, Parus showed them pictures of workers who had died at the plant and "portrayed to them that there was a huge cultural issue at TXC on safety," according to an internal BP investigation.
Even as the plant's profits continued climbing, reaching nearly $100 million in January 2005 alone, Parus sent an e-mail to his staff saying that "2004 was not a positive year for Texas City Safety," citing three "avoidable" deaths and a major fire. He called for a two-day leadership meeting that "can, and must, be a turning point for the Safety Performance of this site."
That same month, the Telos Group, an outside auditor that Parus had hired, produced what was probably the most damning internal report [4] ever to emerge from the Texas City refinery. After surveying more than 1,000 workers and interviewing hundreds, the auditors concluded that the plant's employees had an "exceptional degree of fear" of a catastrophe, and that "blindness" across the entire corporation prevented critical safety information from reaching the top levels of BP management. It also said that poor conditions at the plant created hazards "you would never encounter at Shell, Chevron, Exxon, etc."

An important purpose of this Mission of Conscience series is to explain how many of the BP Texas City refinery explosions may have resulted from something much more sinister than simply industrial accidents. After all, as discussed elsewhere in this series, BP is largely controlled by the Rothschilds, one of the greatest crime families in all human history (See Chapter 5), and has a very long track record of being tightly involved with Mossad-CIA and British MI6, to include the 1953 Iranian coup d'état overthrow of the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, back when British Petroleum was known as the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC before the name change in 1954. In Chapter 32 of this series, I explore other ruthless intrigues by Rothschild entites to grab oil and land not only in the Middle East, but elsewhere around the world, to include risking nuclear war with Russia by egging Georgia into launching an unprovoked invasion of South Ossetia in August 2008.
It is very possible that the milked-to-the-bone condition of the BP refinery was deliberately sustained not only for short-term profits, but also to provide an alibi for deliberate bomb explosions blamed on "accidents" which could yield "disaster capitalist" profits for top insiders who play gasoline futures. In fact, flashing forward to 2010, I posted online a transcript of a 24 June 2010 interview by Alex Jones with former ranking police officer Jack McLamb, who claims that high level intelligence sources told him that bombs were deliberately set off for the BP-Horizon explosion in 20 April 2010:

Alex Jones: ...What did your Intel sources in Federal law enforcement, local police, and military tell you about what is really going on in the Gulf?
Officer Jack McLamb: Well, it is all staged. It is all staged. They had, as you said, very strange, the Bureau of Land Management on there two hours before the bomb went off. They were doing a very uncharacteristic inspection of an oil rig which the Bureau of Land Management doesn't do. Then two hours after they left, the bomb went off, blew up the oil rig. So it was all a false flag operation to help the oil barons make more money and stop the finding of oil in these offshore oil rigs.
Jones: Because they are monopoly men, just like BP gets 80% of the Alaskan oil.
McLamb: Right.
Jones: And of course they are the big carbon tax pushers. But was this a military source, a police source, was it one source, multiple sources, I mean, give us an idea.
McLamb: It was multiple sources.
Jones: And let me get my timeline right. When did you first start getting this Intel?
McLamb: Oh, about a month ago. Yes, about a month ago. And all the people that I talked to and contacted, and they contacted me, are scared to death of being executed if anybody finds out that they talked to me about it...

In his 17 Jan 2006 Zeph Report interview, May discussed how he came to interpret this explosion back in 2005 from a Kaballistic-Occult perspective:

Capt May: ….the next year there was a 3-23 attack. That was 3-23-2005, BP Texas City, Texas. British Petroleum, March 23rd. And I asked my consultants. I talk to the little gangsters that I used to know [as a high school teacher], you know, Crips, Bloods, Latin Kings, they understand codes. You don't have to be a genius, you just have to work code. And I said "Why 3-23?" And they looked at me like, "You don't get it, Captain?" And I said, "No, no, I don't get it." And they said, "The first one is 3-3, right?" And I said, yes, 3-30 is 3-3, sure. And they said, "The second one is 3-2-3, the second 33, man.
Zeph: Ah, I get it now. Two 3's.
Capt May: You see, you have to look at it a little cock-eyed.
Zeph: Wow, that is interesting.

Regarding high level intrigue, on May 1, 2005 The Sunday Times of London revealed the “Downing Street Memo,” the first hard evidence about how both the UK or US governments lied their countries into war. The “Downing Street Memo" transcribed the minutes of a gathering of many of the British Prime Minister's senior ministers on July 23, 2002.
The Memo, intended for “UK Eyes Only” stated:

….The [ UK ] Defence Secretary said that the US had already begun "spikes of activity" to put pressure on the regime. No decisions had been taken, but he thought the most likely timing in US minds for military action to begin was January, with the timeline beginning 30 days before the US Congressional elections.
The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya , North Korea or Iran . We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force….

The web site summarizes the impact of the memo on its home page:

There is now in the public record a large body of evidence that vividly illustrates:

By June 25th, Capt May sensed things were heating up for another “next 9-11” attempt (or “911 to be” or “911 2 ,” as he likes to code it). He made the following remarks in an 25 June email to a member of Ghost Troop:

I'd particularly like to know what you think of the matter of the timing of the next incident, the "terrorist" incident that will give Bush the military adrenaline -- draft and nukes -- that he will need if he's really going to make a move to secure the region. I'm concerned that the event nears -- must near, for when the summer ends there will be a school year drought in recruiting (already fallen drastically) and a "white flight" of suburbanites who are starting to take an anti-military point of view now that their teens are in line for the Global War on Terror. Matt, I say the Bush Boyz have got to do it this summer or they have to give up the ghost on the War Cabal. I don't figure King George for a quitter, and in fact that his particular strain of homicidal paranoia made him a choice candidate for the cabbalists themselves. It's now or never, isn't it? King George comes to Texas for his summer break in a month or so, and it was right after a month at Crawford that they put the 911 caper into swing... I'm thinking that "9112B" will fit nicely into that time bracket...
By the way, what do you think of "9112B" as a phrase? I invented it, I believe, and it simply signifies the second 911, the 911-to-be which they have regularly sworn to us (both sides of the pond) is not a matter of "IF" but a matter of "WHEN." 9112B will be this summer, I believe, and Houston is my best pick for a location. I think the barons of the oil patch (Bush Boyz) and the Texas Cronies (Bush Boyz) will make out just fine if a few decrepit facilities get a demolition (free, no questions asked), and they get paid off in federal bucks as a disaster zone of epic proportion.

On July 1st, Capt May sent out an email where he selected 7-27-2005 as the likely “9-11 2 B” date:

From: Eric May
To: Arthur Topham ; Top ; Matt Engelman
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 8:44 AM
Subject: 911(2B) signs, Independence Day msg, "War of the Worlds" infowar review

Yo y'all, just a few notes on the kulturkampf, which is just the neocon name for the infowar.

First thing: a cult sign:

The West Point graduating class of 2005 was dubbed by the media at its graduation as "the class of 911." I get it from inside that the "class of 911" was the class of 2002, at least in the language of the WestPoint Corps of Cadets. Ergo, the media pasted a title on the graduation (widely covered) of May 28. "The-class-of-911" tag was probably applied to reinforce the memory of 911 -- as was the "coincidental" number of West Point graduates for the class... 911. Yep, they're signing their work, boyz and girlz, the same was gangs always do -- with cultic signals.

More little tid-bits on the graduation... Half the parents were crying in the stands (this from two sources who attended) because their kids already have orders for Iraq and Afghanistan . This bit of war reality was covered up nicely in the patriotic West Point Graduation / Memorial Day Weekend spectacle with which Ma Megamedia regaled us. I hate to speculate on something that touches so close (I have a friend who graduated among those 911), but I think this class has been dubbed the "hero" class by the War Cabal. They're going to be the lucky kids who get to certainly fight, and perhaps survive, WWIII.

Second thing: Bush sounds the horn

The prez gave a dimly-received pep talk to the folks at Ft. Bragg -- and the lame stuff he offered up was nothing to brag about... Except that he reinforced his basics of 911 / GWOT linkage and insinuated the idea that this is a "world war." This is the all-important basic argument. We're all ready for the dance and just waiting for 9112B to open a world-wide can of whoop-ass.

Third thing: Spielberg sounds the horn

"The War of the Worlds" was the prototype genocide-the-aliens movie, but it wasn't the last. "Independence Day," the Fox studios blockbuster of 1996, was a remake (by another name -- ID4, remember?) of "War of the Worlds," of earlier fame. Well, it has long been a Ghost Troop contention that Independence Day (ID4) was an ID-for (get it) the WWIII/GWOT construct, an attempt to establish the psychological premises for genocidal war against the "aliens" -- led by an ex-fighter pilot president no less!

Read the essay by Phillip Collins ( ) for a fuller examination of the notions I've discussed and a more detailed (and chilling) analysis of "Independence Day." Mr. Collins, by the by, did his excellent work long in advance of my later analysis (2004) of the film...

The us/them dichotomy is being massively reinforced by the remaking of "War of the Worlds" (of which, remember, ID4 was a remake) -- and this the very day after the prez said "world war." Get it? War of the Worlds = World War Three. Like GWOT, they've got to say "World War Three" in as many variant ways as possible to get you ready for when they say WWIII for real...

It's a cinematic signal of final mobilization, and a final reinforcement of the root motif of GWOT/WWIII: we are in a war for survival, and we must genocide (or xenocide, since it's just "aliens" we're talking about) our enemies. I'll go and see the film myself and with great interest. I've already read reviews that sharply criticize the film's exploitation of "post-911 paranoia" to fill seats will apocalyptic atrocities. Anyone surprised?

Remember y'all, Spielberg's earlier films included kulturkampf classics like "Schindler's List," part of the Holocaust Hagiography, and "Saving Private Ryan," which was part of the lionization of the "greatest generation" who fought the last world war -- as a preparation for the next generation (watching the flick) to fight the next world war. Spielberg is doing his level best to get the audience ready to be participants of GWOT/WWIII/"The War of the Worlds" (and they're all the same thing, aren't they?).

Final note on Spielberg's opus: the release date may be cabbalist/illuminatist: 6/29. The six and nine (no giggling, boyz and girlz) are "rotational twins" and as such make 66 or 99, variants of 11. The 2 in between the rotation character -- a signal for the "second" 911? Anyhow, numbers aren't my expertise, but informed sources keep track of them and educated sources can extract much from them. It might be worthwhile to check my math, but I think the West Point graduation (5/28) was the 1339th day from 911. July 27, incidentally will (I believe) be the 1399th day since 911, and it's my personal pick for 911(2B); the numeric date will be 7/27 -- and the same "11" stuff applies to the two 7's around the 2.

Anyhow, I wouldn't bring so much attention to the date if it weren't for the fact that it's the day after the prez alluded to WWIII and during the week he appointed for "taking his case" to America -- and were it not for the fact that on the same day (6/29) the folks in NYC officially began the project for rebuilding ground zero (the former WTC's) as the "Freedom Tower" or some such. As my late art history professor, Dr. Peter W. Guenther, taught me: architectural statements are the most permanent of statements, and inevitably are attended with rich cultural -- and cult -- symbolism. I say it's the NYC beacon of Empire Amerika that they're announcing, y'all.

This will be an interesting summer, my friends -- and I hope, as always, that my alarms are mere alarmism. I hope you will enjoy the real Independence Day, July 4, 1776, the day the founders stood up to the tyranny of King George. Don't let them -- the War Cabal and the Megamedia Mouth that speaks for them -- ever confuse us about what Independence Day means. That's what they were/are/will be trying to do, and it's just where we must try back the hardest.

I salute all Ghost Troops, the most loyal Americans.

Captain May

Not mentioned in this letter, but cited in later interviews, was another important factor that helped Capt May narrow down July 27, 2005 as a prediction date. Terror events tend to coincide with major military exercises. July 27th happened to be right in the middle of an exercise involving USNORTHCOM, Homeland Security, and Ft. Monroe simulating a 10 Kiloton nuclear explosion. It also was also close to the date of a NASA Space Shuttle Launch, which would bring major media to the John Space Center in the Houston area.


Update References:

2012-08-23 Navy Seal involved in Osama bin Laden raid to release book, A member of the US Navy Seal team that killed Osama bin Laden has written a first hand account of the operation, triggering more questions about the release of classified information, by Mark Owen with Kevin Maurer, [Editor's Note: In all likelihood, consistent with evidence provided in this chapter that the real Bin Laden died in late 2001, this is a fake story about a fake killing in which members of the establishment show fake disapproval, fake threats, and fake unction to give it "street credibility" as a dissident work. The CIA had the whole Cold War period to learn how to use these "wise guy" PSYOP techniques to destabilize and overthrow the governments of Thirld World countries, and now they are doing it here in America. Of course MI6, which controls the CIA, did this all the time during WWI and WWI and even earlier. The technique is very simple. Collate actual cases where the government shows real disapproval, real threats, and real unction regarding a real dissident work as your template, and then substitute in your synthetic dissident work and current establishment figures for the historic figures in the template. Then place your story in Rothschild / City of London or other establishment-controlled major media, and presto! the fake work gets the appearance of a real dissident work. This PSYOP technique has a lot of similarities to the way professional actors study historic examples of real people who come close to the character they are trying to simulate on stage as part of the "method acting" process of constructing a "stage character." Incidentally, in regard to Gen. Dempsey mentioned below, he appeared before the Senate Committee Armed Services Committee on March 7, 2012 with former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and supported Panetta in his assertion that the Pentagon no longer has to consult Congress before it goes to war, but instead takes orders from the United Nations, an act which Alex Jones called "high treason." See Coup D’etat: Pentagon & Obama Declare Congress Ceremonial by Paul Joseph Watson, March 9, 2012, which starts with: "Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s testimony asserting that the United Nations and NATO have supreme authority over the actions of the United States military, words which effectively declare Congress a ceremonial relic, have prompted Congressman Walter Jones to introduce a resolution that re-affirms such behavior as an `impeachable high crime and misdemeanor' under the Constitution." And now back to the article which appeared in the about the book about Bin Laden:]
"US military officials say they do not believe the book has been read or cleared by the Defense Department, which reviews publications by military members to make sure that no classified material is revealed.
The book, titled "No Easy Day" and scheduled to be released Sept 11, comes amid a heated debate over whether members of the military - both active duty and retired - should engage in political battles.
"I haven't read the book and am unaware that anyone in the Department has reviewed it," said Pentagon press secretary George Little. White House and CIA officials also said the book had not been reviewed by their agencies.
The book announcement comes just as a group of retired special operations and CIA officers have launched a campaign accusing President Barack Obama of revealing classified details of the mission and turning the killing of bin Laden into a campaign centerpiece. The group complains that Obama has taken too much credit for the operation.
Their public complaints drew a rebuke from Gen Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as other special operations forces, who called the partisan criticism unprofessional.
Gen Dempsey said that such public political involvement by members of armed services erodes public confidence and trust in the military.
The author of the upcoming bin Laden book, who has left the military, is using the pseudonym Mark Owen. And in a news release from publisher Dutton, Owen describes the book as an effort to "set the record straight about one of the most important missions in US military history."
He said the book is about "the guys" and the sacrifices that the special operations forces make to do the job and is written in the hope that it will inspire young men to become Seals.
If the book sticks to his personal thoughts about the job and the mission, Owen may be in the clear. But often special operations forces must sign nondisclosure agreements. And they are not allowed to release classified information, such as intelligence data or military tactics and procedures used to ensure success of the May 2011 raid.
Source: agencies
Christine Ball, a spokeswoman for the Penguin imprint Dutton, said the work was vetted by a former special operations attorney provided by the author.
"He vetted it for tactical, technical and procedural information as well as information that could be considered classified by compilation and found it to be without risk to national security," Ball said.
Defense Department spokesman Lt. Col. James Gregory said that if the book reveals classified information about the raid, the Pentagon would "defer to the Department of Justice."
According to Pentagon regulations, retired personnel, former employees and non-active duty members of the Reserves "shall use the DoD security review process to ensure that information they submit for public release does not compromise national security."
The CIA also could weigh in because the agency ran the secret bin Laden mission.
If there is classified information in the book, the former SEAL could face criminal charges. And even if he donates the money to charity, for instance, that is unlikely to prevent the Justice Department from suing to collect any future book proceeds.
Earlier this year, a federal judge ruled a CIA whistle-blower had to forfeit future money he earned from a scathing book he wrote about the spy agency after he failed to get approval from his former employer before publication.
The CIA accused the officer of breaking his secrecy agreement with the U.S. The former officer, who worked deep undercover, published the book in July 2008 using the pseudonym Ishmael Jones.
The CIA said his book, "The Human Factor: Inside the CIA's Dysfunctional Intelligence Culture," was submitted to the agency's publications review board under a secrecy agreement that covers books written by former employees. But Jones, who published the book before the review process was completed, said it contained no classified information...[more here]
2011-09-02 Post 9/11 CIA has become a killing machine focused on hunting down terrorists 'faster than they can grow them' by Daniel Bates,
2011-08-07 The Execution Of SEAL Team Six by Ann Barnhardt, "On May 5th, I had an email conversation with a retired military man with spook contacts. All were in total agreement that the Bin Laden episode was pure theater. The SEALS were sent into a compound as evidenced by the lost chopper on site. But Osama Bin Laden wasn't in that compound. Osama Bin Laden has been dead for years..."
2011-05-07 Bodyguard of Lies protects the truth about Osama bin Laden Los Angeles Times Says: Time to Stop Doubting the Media and Government with an Afterword by Michael Hoffman,
2011-05-06 Media Scrambles as Bin Laden Story Crumbles by Alex Newman,,
2011-05-05 The Agendas Behind the bin Laden News Event by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,
2011-05-04 Bin Laden Died in 2001,, section by Veterans For Peace, last update 4 May 2011

Top US Government Insider:
Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag Operation 

Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations Steve R. Pieczenik says he is prepared to tell a federal grand jury the name of a top general who told him directly 9/11 was a false flag attack

Paul Joseph Watson
Wednesday, May 4, 2011  

Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job.

Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”. He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT.  

Recruited by Lawrence Eagleburger as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Management, Pieczenik went on to develop, “the basic tenets for psychological warfare, counter terrorism, strategy and tactics for transcultural negotiations for the US State Department, military and intelligence communities and other agencies of the US Government,” while also developing foundational strategies for hostage rescue that were later employed around the world.  

Pieczenik also served as a senior policy planner under Secretaries Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker and worked on George W. Bush’s election campaign against Al Gore. His record underscores the fact that he is one of the most deeply connected men in intelligence circles over the past three decades plus.  

The character of Jack Ryan, who appears in many Tom Clancy novels and was also played by Harrison Ford in the popular 1992 movie Patriot Games, is also based on Steve Pieczenik.

Back in April 2002, over nine years ago, Pieczenik told the Alex Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been “dead for months,” and that the government was waiting for the most politically expedient time to roll out his corpse. Pieczenik would be in a position to know, having personally met Bin Laden and worked with him during the proxy war against the Soviets in Afghanistan back in the early 80?s.  

Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, “Not because special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome,” adding that the US government knew Bin Laden was dead before they invaded Afghanistan.

Marfan syndrome is a degenerative genetic disease for which there is no permanent cure. The illness severely shortens the life span of the sufferer.

“He died of marfan syndrome, Bush junior knew about it, the intelligence community knew about it,” said Pieczenik, noting how CIA physicians had visited Bin Laden in July 2001 at the American Hospital in Dubai.

“He was already very sick from marfan syndrome and he was already dying, so nobody had to kill him,” added Pieczenik, stating that Bin Laden died shortly after 9/11 in his Tora Bora cave complex.  

“Did the intelligence community or the CIA doctor up this situation, the answer is yes, categorically yes,” said Pieczenik, referring to Sunday’s claim that Bin Laden was killed at his compound in Pakistan, adding, “This whole scenario where you see a bunch of people sitting there looking at a screen and they look as if they’re intense, that’s nonsense,” referring to the images released by the White House which claim to show Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton watching the operation to kill Bin Laden live on a television screen.  

“It’s a total make-up, make believe, we’re in an American theater of the absurd….why are we doing this again….nine years ago this man was already dead….why does the government repeatedly have to lie to the American people,” asked Pieczenik.  

“Osama Bin Laden was totally dead, so there’s no way they could have attacked or confronted or killed Osama Bin laden,” said Pieczenik, joking that the only way it could have happened was if special forces had attacked a mortuary.  

Pieczenik said that the decision to launch the hoax now was made because Obama had reached a low with plummeting approval ratings and the fact that the birther issue was blowing up in his face.  

“He had to prove that he was more than American….he had to be aggressive,” said Pieczenik, adding that the farce was also a way of isolating Pakistan as a retaliation fointense opposition to the Predator drone program, which has killed hundreds of Pakistanis.  

“This is orchestrated, I mean when you have people sitting around and watching a sitcom, basically the operations center of the White House, and you have a president coming out almost zombie-like telling you they just killed Osama Bin Laden who was already dead nine years ago,” said Pieczenik, calling the episode, “the greatest falsehood I’ve ever heard, I mean it was absurd.” 

Dismissing the government’s account of the assassination of Bin Laden as a “sick joke” on the American people, Pieczenik said, “They are so desperate to make Obama viable, to negate the fact that he may not have been born here, any questions about his background, any irregularities about his background, to make him look assertive….to re-elect this president so the American public can be duped once again.”  

Pieczenik’s assertion that Bin Laden died almost ten years ago is echoed by numerous intelligence professionals as well as heads of state across the world.  

Bin Laden, “Was used in the same way that 9/11 was used to mobilize the emotions and feelings of the American people in order to go to a war that had to be justified through a narrative that Bush junior created and Cheney created about the world of terrorism,” stated Pieczenik.  

During his interview with the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Pieczenik also asserted he was directly told by a prominent general that 9/11 was a stand down and a false flag operation, and that he is prepared to go to a grand jury to reveal the general’s name.  

“They ran the attacks,” said Pieczenik, naming Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Stephen Hadley, Elliott Abrams, and Condoleezza Rice amongst others as having been directly involved.  

“It was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under false pretenses….it was told to me even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz – I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the individual so that we can break it open,” said Pieczenik, adding that he was “furious” and “knew it had happened”.  

“I taught stand down and false flag operations at the national war college, I’ve taught it with all my operatives so I knew exactly what was done to the American public,” he added.  

Pieczenik re-iterated that he was perfectly willing to reveal the name of the general who told him 9/11 was an inside job in a federal court, “so that we can unravel this thing legally, not with the stupid 9/11 Commission that was absurd.”  

Pieczenik explained that he was not a liberal, a conservative or a tea party member, merely an American who is deeply concerned about the direction in which his country is heading. 



Osama Bin Laden: The Movie

When are We the People gonna wake up to
the duplicity coming at us from the
Repugnicans and Demonrats?
Time to do a little accounting folks!

Throw Out Every Zionist,
Throw Out Every Neocon, Throw Out Every
War Monger and Fear Monger — and Throw Out Israel
(the blueprint of the Nazi state)



Ten Facts That Prove The Bin Laden
Fable is a Contrived Hoax

Osama Bin Laden's Useful Death

"On the Rocks," The Re-Death of Bin Laden's Frozen Corpse (BBC/VT Broadcast)


Osama bin Laden’s death, who do you believe?


Veterans for Peace

Updated: Wednesday, 04 May 2011, 6:39 AM EDT
Published : Wednesday, 04 May 2011, 6:39 AM EDT

Troops have been in Afghanistan for almost a decade now and a Central Florida veterans group wants them brought home now.

Phil Restino from Veterans for Peace stopped by Good Day Wednesday to talk about the organization and their mission.

You can get a free DVD copy of the group’s video "Questioning the U.S. War on Terror" by contacting the Central Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace by telephone at (386) 788-2918 or by email at

Read more:

YouTube - Veterans Today -


PhotoSYOPshop®: Faking Osama bin Dead for a While's Corpse Photos

Osama bin Laden corpse photo is fake

CIA Admits Making Fake Osama bin Laden Videos
- Wanted to Create Fake Saddam Porn Video

As explained by many people and announced by the Taliban in Dec 2001, Osama died of lung disease in Dec 2001. Everything else are official CIA lies and fabrications. Osama stated right after 9/11 that it was an inside job by traitors within the US. The FBI stated "we have no evidence that connects Osama Bin Laden to 911".....which is why HE wasn’t on the FBI most wanted can check the FBI website:

The CIA killed an unarmed man, shot him in the face so that he cannot be identified in photos and claimed they killed Osama. Watch this video on the Secrets of the CIA Terror Machine


You must watch this film...The FBI stated "we have no evidence that connects Osama Bin Laden to 911".....which is why HE wasnt on the FBI most wanted list...lots of facts here for all you believers in the story you thought was true., check FBI website

The CIA killed an unarmed man, shot him in the face so that he cannot be identified in photos and claimed they killed Osama. Watch this video on the Secrets of the CIA Terror Machine

Bin Laden Says He Wasn't Behind Attacks

Osama Bin Laden Set Up as Bogey Man for War Mongers

2011-05-03 Osama bin Laden’s Useful Death by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,
2011-05-02 Inside Sources: Bin Laden’s Corpse Has Been On Ice For Nearly a Decade by Paul Joseph Watson,
2011-05-01 OBL Death Means "Nuclear Hellstorm" Vows KSM! by Capt. May. Additional comments by William B. Fox
2011-03-04 Gaddafi, Saddam, and the CIA,
2011-01-14 Intelligence Briefs or Disinformation? How to tell the difference by Philip Brennan,, "Before I go into this subject in any great depth, I would first like to deal with Sorcha Faal, otherwise known as David Booth of the CIA. David Booth works within the Central Intelligence Agency in COINTELPRO. Other western intelligence agencies known for using COINTELPRO methods include MI5, MI6, GCHQ, and the think-tank, DEMOS. To be quite blunt, all intelligence agencies have their own COINTELPRO departments...It appears that David Booth is a major thorn in the side of the Alternative Intelligence Community, as well as the Patriot and Truth Movements. This is a gross understatement. Over the past week or two I have had to take aside many people and let them in on the whole Sorcha Faal thing..."
2010-12-08 11 Reasons Why the Threat From Al Qaeda is Not Real by Saman Mohammadi,, also archived at The Excavator. "#1. Radical American cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki, who was ordered to be assassinated by President Obama, met with top military officials at the Pentagon months after the 9/11 attacks. Were Pentagon officials sincerely interested in reaching out to members of the Muslim community, or were they recruiting radical Muslim clerics to spread the message of radical Islam in order to validate and sustain the Bush administration’s war on terror? It is not outrageous or crazy to raise the question if the U.S. government aims to inflame radical Islam, even by funding and supporting undercover intelligence agents that front as terrorists, in order to make the American people perceive that they are in danger of violent Islamic extremism, and cause them to give up their liberties for permanent security..."
2010-09-28 Osama bin Laden to be replaced with US-born Yemeni, by Pyotr Shmelev,
2010-09-10 9/11 ANALYSIS: Where was Osama bin Laden on September 11, 2001 by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research
2010-05-25 Former CIA Officials Admit To Faking Bin Laden Video by Steve Watson,
2010-05-25 CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay by Jeff Stein, Spytalk, Washington Post:
"...The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from `some of us darker-skinned employees,' he said.
Eventually, `things ground to a halt,' the other former officer said, because no one could come to agreement on the projects..."
2010-01-30 Osama speaking. Or is he? An RT interview with Wayne Madsen. "An audio tape has been released allegedly from Al Qaeda’s leader Osama bin Laden. It’s the second in just a week."

RT: 30 Jan 2010, "Osama Speaking, Or Is He?"

2009-12-10 Years Of Deceit: US Openly Accepts Bin Laden Long Dead By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, World News Daily Information Clearing House.
2009-08-20 Ridge says he was pressured to raise terror alert; In book, ex-Homeland Security chief hints Bush aides wanted to sway vote, by AP,
"WASHINGTON — Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge claims in a new book that he was pressured by other members of President George W. Bush's Cabinet to raise the nation's terror alert level just before the 2004 presidential election.
Ridge says he objected to raising the security level despite the urgings of former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, according to a publicity release from Ridge's publisher. He said the episode convinced him to follow through with his plans to leave the administration; he resigned on Nov. 30, 2004..."
2009-05-20 Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? By David Ray Griffin. This book by leading 9/11 Truth scholar provides strong evidence that Bin Laden died in December 2001.
2008-02-02 Benazir Bhutto: Omar Sheikh Murdered Osama bin-Laden from Little Country Lost blog. Interesting timeline and list of sources created by Jen Clark about whether Benazir Bhutto told the truth about an Osama Bin Laden assassin.


Additional Web Sites: Web site for the Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist documentary by The Corbett Report.
Texas City Refinery Explosion (2005) Wikipedia.



Forward to Chapter 13
Back to Chapter 11
Return to Contents
Books I-III Summary Table of Contents


Short URL for this web page:

The Cowpens Flag, one of many circular star patterns used by "American Whigs" (or "Patriots")

© America First Books
America First Books offers many viewpoints that are not necessarily its own in order to provide additional perspectives.