summary, most of the officially stated reasons for the invasion of
and Afghan reflect obsolete 19th century grand
strategic thinking by Zionist neo-cons.
Central Asia had once been the focus of “The Great Game”
, and other powers during the Victorian era.
However, the new center of the chess board is not central Asia nor its oil resources, but rather maintaining technological
and manufacturing leadership in such strategic industries as mobile
robotics, computers, and alternative energy.
his book In Praise of Hard Industries, Eumonn Fingleton explains why a healthy
economy maintains heavy manufacturing at about 33% of GDP, and why
this typically comprises the bedrock of the truly productive part
of the economy. In contrast,
in the last three decades America
has outsourced so much industry to Third World
countries that manufacturing has dropped to below 12%. For those who agree with Fingleton’s
interpretation of economics, this has been both a very dangerous and
irresponsible policy foisted by America
’s Zionist power elite.
It suggests that Americans have lost about 75% of their “real”
economy and are surviving mainly by creating and swapping financial
assets rather than by creating quality exportable real goods.
a healthy manufacturing base also implies maintaining the same healthy
and productive white middle class in America
that once made America
the greatest and most innovative industrial nation on
the earth in the 19th century. However, Zionist neo-cons
long ago subverted these domestic policy options.
They have subverted the integrity of the white middle class
by supporting massive Third World
illegal immigration, affirmative action, forced racial integration,
multiculturalism, political correctness repression, and other radical
leftist, anti-nationalist programs.
Not surprisingly, one can find economic graphs online (for
example at the Grandfather economic report) that show a steady decline
in American labor and education productivity as the quality of the
labor force, not to mention the overall population, has been diluted
as a consequence of leftist social programs.
a period of many decades, innately criminal Zionists and their corrupt
gentile confederates have made a mess out of
, and they know full well that there could be hell to pay for their
compulsive desire to subvert white ethnic-genetic interests and create
a casino economy that reflects their innate speculative approach to
can hence see how reinvoking the “Great Game” has served
as “cover” for pouring vast resources into Middle Eastern
military adventures that can also be siphoned off to Israel
or used to flatten Israel
“Global War on Terror” is a ploy to distract Americans
away from their burgeoning domestic problems. It gives Zionist neo-cons an excuse to
install a Homeland Security state inside America to keep anti-Zionist Americans
under control, especially as the signs of economic distress begin
the real grand strategic objective has had more to do with
repressing American domestic resistance to Zionist power in
than repressing Iraqi resistance to American occupation troops ―hence
the continuing need for Bush cabal false flag operations to keep the
American population continually off balance with terror “fixes.”
of the cardinal tenets of Right Wing 101 is that as a particular racial
or ethnic group grows in power, it tends to reshape the social environment
around itself to fit its own peculiar characteristics. Contrary to the glowing image portrayed
by America ’s national media that the Jewish
state of Israel
exemplifies some kind of “sole democracy” and “gallant
ally” in the Middle East, many Israeli dissidents complain that
the real Israel
is in actuality a highly corrupt and authoritarian police state run
by the gangsterish Mossad. Former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky,
author of By Way of Deception,
is an example of one such dissident. So
was the late Professor Israel Shahak, author of Jewish
History, Jewish Religion: The Weight Of Three Thousand Years, who explained how Talmudic Judaism is fundamentally
a totalitarian religion.
we see a subconscious move by Zionist neo-cons to “Israelize”
domestic America in the same way that they have “Israelized”
the U.S. military in Iraq by baiting American commanders into using
Israeli “West Bank” and “Gaza” tactics.
top of all this, let us consider the political impact on the Iraqi
population from the use of torture, the contamination of vast areas
of Iraq and Afghanistan with aerosolized depleted uranium, the unwillingness
of America to protect cultural and archeological treasures, and the
failure to repair bombing of water plants, sewage lines, and other
and hosts of other ills signaled to Iraqis and Afghans alike that
the main American-Israeli goal was exploitation and reductionism,
and not any form of mutual progress.
They were faced with an oppressive occupier, not a liberator,
and hence needed to act accordingly.
without reinstating the draft, most
has always lacked anything near the number of troops required in both
Afghanistan and Iraq to enforce any kind of total
lock-down occupation policy amidst a highly resentful population. Even prior to the invasion, Army Chief
of Staff, General
Eric Shenseki once testified before Congress that the post-invasion
would require "something
in the order of several hundred thousand soldiers.”
forced to ratchet up repression to the nth degree, America
generally lacked the psychological preparation and political ideology
to ruthlessly go all the way like Mongol conquerors who once wiped
out the population of Baghdad
. Nor has America ever been particularly interested
in seriously colonizing occupied Middle Eastern areas as permanent
of such extreme measures, the Iraqis and Afghans could be expected
to re-enact their proven historical track records in waging very expensive
long term insurgencies against foreign occupiers.
Douglas McArthur once warned America about getting bogged down in
Asian land wars, and it is hard to imagine anything more strategically
untenable than for America to try to subjugate many tens of millions
of Asians in countries that are flanked by multiple hostile countries
that can serve as sanctuaries for insurgents as well as conduits of
endless armaments for them.
American policy was neither fish nor fowl. It was unable to decisively move in any
direction except towards disaster. It was neither winning the voluntary
compliance (or “hearts and minds”) of occupied Muslim
populations, nor was it capable of ruthlessly applying the force necessary
to maintain coercive control over an incorrigibly hostile population.
observers could clearly see as early as July 2003 that the America’s
strong-armed military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan was living
on borrowed time, bleeding off valuable national resources and going
nowhere at the same time that America’s highly indebted and
gutted industrial economy could least afford it.
even “liberal Establishment” academicians would eventually
start sounding alarm bells. Stephen Walt, former Dean of Harvard's
Kennedy School of Government (left), and John Mersheimer, Professor
at the University of Chicago co-authored "The
Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" in 2006 which contained
the following passages:
national interest should be the primary object of American foreign
policy. For the past several decades, however, and especially since the Six Day
War in 1967, the centerpiece of U.S. Middle East policy has been its relationship
. The combination of unwavering
U.S. support for Israel and the
related effort to spread democracy throughout the region has inflamed Arab and
Islamic opinion and jeopardized
This situation has no equal in American political history. Why has the
States been willing to set aside its own security in order to advance the interests
of another state? One might assume that the bond between the two countries is
based on shared strategic interests or compelling moral imperatives. As we
show below, however, neither of those explanations can account for the
remarkable level of material and diplomatic support that the
provides to Israel
Instead, the overall thrust of
U.S. policy in the region is due almost entirely to
domestic politics, and especially to the activities of the “Israel Lobby.” Other
special interest groups have managed to skew
U.S. foreign policy in directions
they favored, but no lobby has managed to divert
U.S. foreign policy as far from
what the American national interest would otherwise suggest, while
simultaneously convincing Americans that
U.S. and Israeli interests are
publishing initial studies in 2005 depicting vast long term war-related
liabilities, Professor Joseph E. Stiglitz and Linda S. Bilmes of Harvard’s
Kennedy School of Government came out with The
Three Trillion Dollar War in 2008. This title alone speaks
volumes about the likely long term costs incurred by America
’s Zionist neo-con ill-inspired military adventures in Afghanistan
William Odom, former director of the National Security Agency, wrote
in his Oct. 3, 2005 essay, "What's
Wrong with Cutting and Running"?
"The invasion of Iraq will turn out to be the greatest strategic
disaster in US
"The wisest course for journalists might be to begin sustained
investigation of why leading Democrats have failed so miserably to
challenge the US
occupation of Iraq
"The war was never in the US 's interests and has not become
so. It is such an obvious case to make that I find it difficult to
believe many pundits and political leaders have not already made it
really was a quicksand war ― exactly as Captain May predicted.
’s chronic balance of trade deficits continued
to grow, and its total government and corporate debt continued to
escalate into very dangerous levels.
the worst case scenario, if this bleeding did not stop, America
could eventually implode much like the former Soviet
Union . It could face a nation-shattering
us now return to July 2003 when war critics faced a heavy climate
of fear and intimidation despite early evidence of national policy
incompetence and betrayal.
is worth emphasizing that these “first in” war critics
deserve a measure of glory for creating a beach head of dissent. Their
brave efforts helped to defang and beat back Bush covert terror. They created just enough breathing room
so that the aforementioned academic critics could later enter the
fray without risking their lives.
May described the overall sequence of events triggered by Gen Clark’s
25 June interview in his 12 Oct 2005 Cloak and Dagger interview:
first week loyalist Constitutional forces were on the march. The second
week Boy George runs off to Africa
and his henchman started setting it up. The third week they started
killing people outright, and Boy George almost fell off the throne.
explained the significance of Clark’s criticisms in his 8 July
2003 article “Worried About the Quicksand
of War in Iraq
we were about to begin our war against Iraq , we expected to soon capture,
control and convert it – then make a lot of money in its Reconstruction.
Erstwhile allies complained that we were playing with matches in the
world’s most flammable region, but we told them that they could
go to Helsinki .
our bombs started falling March 20, the United Nations made a silent
protest by putting a shroud over Pablo Picasso’s famous painting
Guernica , which encanvassed the horror of
modern war. That story didn’t get around much, though. After
all, we had already dismissed the UN as even less relevant than NATO.
May 1 President George W. Bush stood on the deck of USS Abraham Lincoln
and proudly declared an end to major combat operations, but just this
week Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld stood before reporters and
testily told them that while major combat operations are indeed at
an end, the United States
is still at war. The president’s words were naiveté;
the secretary’s were nonsense.
we began the war in Iraq
, the Bush administration has threatened (in order) Turkey
to the north, Syria
to the west, Saudi Arabia
to the south and Iran
to the east. Many Americans think we need to get more
aggressive. This week in the Chronicle, Bush apologists loudly
banged the war drums: Austin Bay
opined that it was a good thing we recently attacked
Syrian border guards in Syrian territory, since respect for national
borders only hinders us in the war on terror. Sometimes it seems like
we’re at war – or may soon be at war – with lots
of folks. Columnist Thomas L Friedman stated his belief that we should
double our troop commitment to Iraq
. Throughout the piece, he skillfully avoided the disturbing
LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP! George Bush/Powell Doctrine
has been replaced by the JUMP RIGHT IN! George W.
Bush/Rumsfeld Doctrine. The results so far suggest that the father
picked his strategy and his strategist better than the son. The First
Gulf War required a mere 100 hours of ground operations to end, while
the Second Gulf War has passed its 100th day, and is just
beginning. The forces that were supposed to be home by summer are
still over there, and we’re committing ourselves to a long occupation.
Pentagon now admits that we have an Iraqi insurgency on our hands.
Insurgency is what we tried to deal with in Vietnam
, and what the Soviet Union tried to deal with in
Afghanistan . Both attempts failed,
after around ten years of war and around 50,000 deaths, showing that
superpowers don’t necessarily get super results.
I’m worried. In fact, I was worried on April 3, when my essay
“Visions of Stalingrad: Claim victory in
now” appeared in the Chronicle’s
Outlook Section. That piece earned me the nickname of “the April
Fool,” because in it I wrote that Operation Iraqi Freedom was
a bold leap forward – straight into quicksand…
I take some comfort because General Wesley Clark is worried, too.
In a June 25 CNN Crossfire interview, Clark launched a broad
attack on the president who attacked Iraq:
· Asked about recent reports that
the Bush administration had pressured intelligence officials to mangle
data and justify war, Clark went
even further than the question: “There was a predetermination
that started back in the 1990s to go after Saddam Hussein. 9/11 provided
the opportunity to mobilize public opinion to do that.”
· Asked why the Bush administration had invaded Iraq in the
first place, Clark cited “belief that somehow there was a window
of opportunity, that the United States had a period of maybe 10 or
15 years before China would become too strong, where we could use
our unchallengeable military muscle and clean up the area.”
· Asked about the problems of our occupation of Iraq
, Clark repeatedly stressed that
we needed to make our presence “legitimate,” a reminder
that the reasons we gave for going there in the first place seem illegitimate
today. He suggested a major role for the United Nations and other
· Clark made another good suggestion: “I think that the
American people deserve a hearing on Iraq
. I think it needs to be openly, transparently presented
as to what exactly the issues were.”
may say that Clark is merely another Democratic presidential wannabe
taking pot shots at the Bush administration, but the general has acted
with courageous integrity before: As NATO commander, he repeatedly
pushed a vacillating President Clinton to stick it out in war torn
Bosnia, and in doing so helped bring
that country under control. After the job was done, Clinton
canned Clark out of spite, thus earning
the general praises from Republicans for being a true patriot. It’s
hard to see why the man who uprightly talked sense to Democrat Clinton
is crooked when he talks sense about Republican Bush.
seems more like a voice of sanity to worriers like me, and as a former
Army intelligence officer and Desert Storm volunteer, I worry a lot:
I worry about wobbly war plans; I worry that Rumsfeld is canning generals
who fail to tell him what he wants to hear; I worry that the US body
count could climb from one per day to one per hour; and I worry that
the president who as a young American prudently avoided the sweltering
jungles of Vietnam and Cambodia will send a generation of young Americans
to the sweltering deserts of Iraq and Afghanistan. In short, I worry
that we are sinking deeper into the quicksand – and we’re
trying to thrash our way out.
believe that the next presidential election will be about the missteps
and misstatements that have misled us into this war. In that case,
a victorious general might be as welcome a candidate in 2004 as General
Eisenhower was in 1952, when voters liked Ike for promising to get
us out of Korea .
hope we will soon have the public hearings that General Clark has
called for. In the meantime, I’ll continue to worry when the
Bush administration says that things are well in hand. Maybe what
we have well in hand is a time bomb.
sent his full article “Worried
about the quicksand of war in Iraq”
to the Houston Chronicle, which held on to it. As he noted in his
13 Oct 2005 Cloak and Dagger interview:
May: …I gave it to my editor on the 29th of
June, and my editor, Frank Michel, the associate editor of the Chronicle,
and his assistant David Langworthy, the op-ed editor of the Chronicle, did not want to touch it. They
wanted me to send it –in fact I remember very specifically that
they asked me to send it to the general op-ed email address, and not
to their particular email addresses. At the time I did not think much
of that. But I realize now that they knew it was going to be very
hot. Hotter than I did. They sat on it over the 4th of
July weekend, after telling me in the case of Frank Michel, that we
should wait for developments because a lot of stuff could happen over
a weekend. At this distance I realize that that was the weekend when
you might say the moderates or the anti-Bush faction of the establishment
was trying to replace leaders, or was trying to rework the war plan.
Because that is the same time that Joe Wilson, after trying for three
months to get someone to publish his op-ed, undercutting the Bush
rationale on WMD nuclear material from Niger, finally got the New
York Times to give him the green light. So I realize now that
my Hearst Corporation editors probably had an inside word from the
national media that there was going to be a run made at Bush. That
run occurred on the 6th of July with the publication of
Joe Wilson’s “What I Didn’t Find in Niger
” op-ed for the New York
Lenny Bloom: Right.
Capt May: The next day
I kind of hit a home run down here in Houston
. I called up our Clear Channel affiliate, ironically,
right wing talk show, KPRC 950 and got Chris Baker, the local right
wing talk show host to actually interview me for ten minutes about
. And I started out, by he said “What do you think about the
war,” and I said “It is great. Think of how low the battle
deaths are.” And he said “Why do you think that is?”
And I said, because I think they are not reporting the people who
died.” And then he of course said, “Give me specifics”
and that of course let the door down. And I just started talking
Baghdad . And we talked
Baghdad for ten minutes. Within five minutes
of that call, Chris Baker was announcing to the public that he was
going on a two week leave of absence and would not be back, and they
did not talk about Iraq
for the rest of the day. The next –within an hour of that–my
Houston Chronicle editor called me and
said they were going to run the op-ed the next day. The way I interpret
that is that Wilson got his strike in on the 6th of July,
my Clear Channel strike, Houston market, came the 7th of
July, and at that point some of the editors at the Chronicle
thought it was time to go ahead and run the op-ed and we would be
the Southern flank of this attack on the White House for its boggled
illegal war. My piece ran on the 8th of July. Now we know
that on the 8th of July, [Bush advisor Scooter]
Libby was lobbying heavily to counterattack Wilson for his
life, Bush was on the way to Africa, which the media will never say
it, but the deal was he wanted to get clear of what was going to happen,
and what was going to happen was massive retaliation. So on the way
Colin Powell notes that a file giving Valerie Plame particular identity
and duty status was being circulated among the White House staff.
So we can pretty much see deeds most foul being plotted on the 8th.
May observed in the 13 Oct 2005 Cloak and Dagger interview that the
real reason for the deliberation about outing Valerie Plame as a CIA
operative may have been to set both her and her husband up for assassination.
If they had been killed by Bush operatives, the Bush administration
could then blame it on Al Qaeda.
this high level plotting for revenge against Bush critics, The
Houston Chronicle ran May’s article “Worried About
the Quicksand of War in Iraq
” on 8 July.
Captain May later remarked to talk show host Lenny Bloom in
the 13 Oct 2005 Cloak and Dagger interview:
piece was I think the strongest, most severe criticism of the Bush
incompetence to date. Not just to that date, to this date, because
it was run by fairly brave editors and long time friends of mine who
knew that I had hit the ball out of the park by catching their pants
down on Baghdad . I had broken that story, and everyone
figured that with Wilson
’s piece coming out, that it might be the end of
the Bush regime.
Bush also came under attack in England
. Around the 6th, Dr. David Kelly, a Weapons of Mass Destruction
expert, told BBC that Blair had “sexed up” the intelligence
to go to war. His assertion
would later be confirmed by the Downing Street
memorandum that got leaked to the public.
However, at the time it was another kick in the knee for the
long after Kelly’s statement, rumblings of retaliation began.
They culminated in Dr. David Kelly’s assassination
and Captain May’s run for cover.
his 13 Oct 2005 Cloak and Dagger interview, Capt May stated:
May: …The 8th, Kelly was
confronted by the Ministry of Defense, I think the 9th,
10th, and 11th he was basically worked over
by the Ministry of Defense, you can tell me, but I think it was the
next week –I think the 14th, yes the 14th,
I think when Robert Novak took the shot at Valerie Plame and outed
her in the Chicago Tribune, and I think about the
same time that David Kelly started getting fed to Parliament. And
you will remember that kind of rending interview that he had with
the Parliamentary figure when one after another said “You feel
like you are being set up, don’t you?” And he said, “I
Lenny Bloom: Yes. Exactly.
Capt May: “You feel
like a fall guy, don’t you?” And he said, “I can’t
Capt May: And it had been
pretty clear that he had been intimidated and cowed into compliance.
LB: Yes, exactly.
Capt May: OK, again, none
of this was reported in the American press.
LB: Well no, of course
not. But pretty much all of us who follow the world press and watch
back stage on the global theater were aware of what was going on.
Capt May: Well you are
the kind of people who saved my life, Lenny, because what happened
is I had two contacts and it is fair to use both their names now that
both were octogenarian World War II veterans and both are since deceased.
The one was a Mr. Joseph Cullman, an American soldier from the Pacific
of World War II, and the other was a professor Peter Guenther who
was a Wehrmacht officer on the Eastern front. And these two gentlemen
had a global perspective on events, and were watching things very
carefully. Both of them on the morning of the 17th of July
told me that I had better get out of sight or I was going to die.
And I so implicitly believed their advice that I was actually home
–and a lot of this is easy enough to document – everyone
saw that I was the oddity of the neighborhood. My doors were barricaded,
my windows were blacked out, and I was underground eight hours before
Dr. Kelly’s death. Kelly died at about midnight our time here,
and I have been underground since about 3:00 PM here. So about eight
or nine hours that I beat the Kelly assassination.
May’s 2 April 2007 Iconoclast interview
concisely summarized the entire retaliatory phase of the “July
was at this point — July 2003 — that the retaliations
we’re now hearing about vaguely in the Scooter Libby trial occurred.
The Libby trial is like an iceberg. Five percent of reality is above
the surface and everything else didn’t get mentioned. It’s
hiding under the surface.
two weeks beginning on the 8th of July, the White House
was in full-scale damage control through retaliations against its
critics. They were about to lose their war and that meant they were
going to lose the presidency because the only reason for the presidency
of Bush was the war. He called himself the war president and he got
it right. That’s what they put him in for, so he was in danger
of being politically emasculated, if not, ultimately impeached for
different things, among them being the cover-up of
why, after we war dissenters attacked him, Bush took an abrupt trip
to Africa in the second week of July.
It was remarkable! Here we were, in the middle of a failing war, and
he runs off to Africa!
impossible to understand what was happening unless you realize that
there were major retaliations about to come down through hatchet-men
Cheney, Rove, Libby, and Rumsfeld. Bush got out of town for the retaliations
of July 2003 the same way that Al Capone got out of Chicago for the St. Valentine’s
Day Massacre — to avoid blame for what was to follow.
retaliations started on the same day my op-ed, “Still Worried
About Quicksand Of War In Iraq,” ran in the Chronicle, July 8. This was the day the
British government arrested and detained Dr. David Kelly. Ministry
of Defense officials kept him for three days, then they released him.
Here in the U.S.
, on July 14, Robert Novak ran the column blowing Valerie Wilson’s
CIA cover as a retaliation for Joe Wilson’s op-ed of July 6.
next couple of days, in the UK
, Kelly was fed to the wolves, testifying before Parliament, where,
basically, Parliament said, “Who’s really behind this,
and don’t you feel like you’re being set up?”
was clearly frightened, and he meekly sat there and said, “I
can’t say, I can’t say, I can’t answer.”
was after he finished talking to Parliament that he, that he told
friends he might be assassinated. On the night of the 17th
he was found dead, with his wrist slashed in a park where he routinely
took a walk.
this was when George Bush came back from his African junket and Tony
Blair, “coincidentally,” met Bush for the first time since
the war started for a joint statement in front of the United States
media. A reporter asked Bush what he was going to do about opposition
to the war, and Bush stared at the camera and said, “We’re
going to address the issue.” Then Bush looked at Blair and Blair
looked back at Bush and the two of them turned around and walked offstage
without saying another word. It was ominous.
next morning, July 18, the British media was noting “how ironic
it is that at the very moment that Tony Blair is meeting with George
Bush, at exactly that moment, Dr. Kelly is found dead.” But
12 hours later, after initially suggesting murder, they were saying,
“suicide.” Now, four-fifths of the British public, according
to polls, still think that Kelly was murdered, but their media won’t
investigate. Kelly’s death was the beginning of Bush and Blair’s
promise to “address the issue.”
the middle of all this, on July 16, my contacts in
Houston told me my life
was in danger, and there were fatal retaliations coming. I went underground
at about noon on the 17th, half a day before the Kelly
assassination, and I believe that it’s only because of this
that I’m alive today. After all, right after the Kelly assassination,
Bush and Company were coming to Houston
Sunday, the 20th, the LA Times ran an editorial cartoon that
quickly went around the nation, which was a picture of Bush with a
gun to his head, like the picture from the Tet offensive in 1968,
where the general was executing the Viet Cong guerrilla out in the
street. The arm holding the gun in the cartoon said, “Politics.”
So, that weekend it looked like the war might be ending, and the Establishment
might be pulling the plug on Bush.
Monday, the 21st, Bush had left Houston
for his ranch in Crawford, and he was falling apart.
Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, came out here to visit
him. They always bring Berlusconi out to bolster Bush, to make him
look presidential. At a press conference that day, Bush couldn’t
read his remarks, they were read for him. His hair was uncombed, he
did not have a tie on, and his hands were shaking. The reason I noted
that was because at the same time I was in hiding and my hands were
shaking. It was a very crucial time.
at about the same time that Bush was falling apart in Crawford, began
to break the story about Jessica Lynch, saying, “…about
the Jessica Lynch story …. At the time we were misled by military
officials …” They were saying, in effect, “Oh,
no fault of ours, but we were bullsh*tted, we were deceived.”
30 minutes later, suddenly the storyline shifted to “Jessica’s
coming home, she’s being released.” Evidently that was
a play for time. They changed the storyline, but they had come that
close to telling the truth about Jessica — which meant telling
the truth about the Battle of Baghdad cover-up.
bottom was falling out of the Bush boat on July 21st, Monday,
that’s why he was falling apart in Crawford. That evening, Donald
Rumsfeld fired his Special Forces commander back at the Pentagon,
and Tuesday morning, July 22, Rumsfeld showed up at the Pentagon for
a sudden conference with his new Special Forces commander, and the
first question out of his mouth is, “Have you killed anybody
the end of the day, the two Hussein boys were killed in
, which held the news cycle for the rest of the week. Remember those
ghoulish three days, when all we saw was Uday’s and Qusay’s
James Davis of New York City was assassinated in his office that same
day by somebody who walked in with a gun, but “fortunately,”
a New York police department intelligence detective who had never
been there before was filling in for his buddy, as security, and right
at the moment that the assassin shot Councilman Davis, the police
sergeant shot the assassin, thereby preventing questions and answers.
About a week later the New
York City council promoted that sergeant
to lieutenant, which sure looked like a payoff.
after the assassination, Councilman Davis’ brother was out in
the street saying, “they killed him,” “they killed
him.” And when asked who, those friends around him said, “Shut
up. They’ll kill you, too.”
on the 22nd of July, the day after it looked like the bottom
was dropping out of the Bush boat, the Hussein boys both end up dead
in Iraq and Councilman
Davis winds up dead in New
York . I still have a question mark on Davis ’ death. I
don’t know whom it served. But a lot of people were making noise
about the war, and what caused it. That may be why they punched his
you have it, from July 17th through the 22nd:
there was a purge in the U.S. and UK . In Ghost Troop we call this
the July Jumble of 2003.
the end of the summer, you had the Gitmo-ization of
. It was in September, in fact, that there was another story the media
was complicit in covering up. Remember Army Captain James Yee, the
Muslim chaplain out of Guantanamo
Bay ? He was
a West Point graduate and war veteran from Operation Desert
Storm. Captain Yee was busted in Florida
, carrying documents from Gitmo, and the Bush Administration
hinted that they were going to try him for treason, a capital offense.
In all likelihood, Captain Yee was probably coming back to the United
States to spill his guts about how they were
mistreating people in Guantanamo Bay
. I suspect he called up a Congressman or a news media
person, who ratted him out to the Department of the Army so they could
figure up a plan to go after him and shut him up.
was at the same time the Bush Administration transferred the commander
at Guantanamo Bay
, Major Gen. Geoffrey Miller, to take over Abu
Ghraib. A few days later, Spec. 4 Alyssa Peterson, a Mormon missionary
who had gone into the military out of matters of principle, who was
an interrogator, a language specialist in the detention center, wound
up dead with “an accidental weapons discharge” to her
skull. Here you have Chaplain Yee, who behaved according to principle,
and tried to blow the whistle, and he winds up in the brig with a
treason charge over his head, and Alyssa Peterson, a girl whose personal
character is very high, who apparently tried to make too much noise
about detention center abuses and was assassinated.
turning point of the summer extended from July, when the Establishment
was seriously thinking about unplugging the Bush presidency and the
Bush world war, to the fall, when Bush got the green light to go ahead.
That’s when we started torturing prisoners and breaking the
Geneva Convention. The summer of 2003 was the pivotal time in the
war. With the recent revelations about how the Bush gang operates,
who can be shocked? Nowadays people see Bush for what he is, not a
“war president,” but a war-monger, and a war criminal.
a post script to the Dr. David Kelly affair, news surfaced four years
later that his fingerprints were not found on the knife that he allegedly
used to kill himself, once again reinforcing strong suspicion of assassination.
(Ketroversey interview 2008). In addition, a Member of Parliament concluded
from a year-long investigation that he was murdered:
fear of getting assassinated was so intense for Captain May that he
tried some very unorthodox maneuvers to save himself.
A sympathizer for Capt May might recollect Odysseus in the
Iliad, who sowed his field
with salt as he plowed, feigning madness in a vain effort to avoid
getting drafted into the Trojan War. (13 Oct 2005 Cloak and Dagger interview)
Capt May: The next morning
I woke up, found out that Kelly was dead, I did not know when he died,
of course, and the word then was that the Bush people were making
a sudden campaign stop in Houston
unannounced. Now Houston
, by the way, was my town. So I remained under cover,
got as many witnesses as I could, wrote my will, all this being at
my Ghost Troop introduction which they can find under Captain May
at Google, as a top item, and in fact that evening at midnight, had
my lawyer wife --I am fortunate to have a lawyer and a wife being
the same person-- checked me into a little place called the West Oaks
Hospital, which is a place where people who are mentally disturbed
go. And my thought at that point was that the best possible chance
that I had was to have myself enrolled so that my attorney wife would
have control of me under habeas corpus. And to get into the
I did was tell you exactly what I told you in the last ten minutes.
I said I am an intelligence officer and a public affairs officer.
I know things that are illegal they are trying to be covered up in
real time, and I think I am going to be killed tonight. Do you have
a place where I can stay? And they said, "Yes, yes, yes, come
here and sit between Jesus and Buddha. Jesus, Buddha, Captain May."
Now I took Napoleon's place. Napoleon had been released a week earlier.
And that is where I spent the night of July 18th, 19th. And after
that went into a three month period of underground writing and, well,
I was underground [until September 21st]. I stayed inside
a barricaded house with witnesses constantly. Didn't leave. I actually
turned white. It was an interesting thing. And that was an underground
existence, during which time I began to write intensively for the
Internet as a cyber reporter. That is when the idea of Ghost Troop
really came. Because the idea was Ghost Troop was the unquiet souls
of the dead who had not been acknowledged from the Battle of Baghdad.
Ghost Troop was all about the cover-up of the dead people. And of
course I had been a ghost writer, so it seemed an appropriate title.
the July Jumble Captain May had direct contact with Thom Shanker,
chief Pentagon correspondent for the New York Times. He also closely observed Shanker’s colleague,
Judith Miller. His experience and observations provide invaluable
insights into the real character of the New York Times, especially since it has served
’s primary Establishment propaganda organ for the
his Cloak and Dagger interview, Captain May described how he tried
to offer his material on the Battle of Baghdad cover-up in July:
Capt May: …The Times received information
from me on July 15th 2003 that the U.S. Department of Defense under
White House orders was covering up the Battle of Baghdad [See email
to Thom Shanker], the thing that happened while they were broadcasting
Jessica Lynch. And the Times, I think, turned me over to
the Bush boys. Because I talked to Thom Shanker, the Chief Pentagon
correspondent for the New York Times, peer and coequal with
Judith Miller. And he took my information after I sent him about a
five page email laying out all that had been done and my background,
and he sent back to me the next day a curt, cryptic little note saying
that "I turned this over to my editor." And about now I
have come to realize that when you talk to a reporter in the
, what they do is turn you over to the editor, and that is as good
as turning you over to the CIA. Because the government has got its
hands inside all the media pies. That is why they call them embedded.
And nobody lives up to it better than Judith Miller.
Lenny Bloom: Right. So she is basically probably
a government agent, Mossad or Israeli agent working in the New
York Times and she helped out in --let us talk about what it
was that she really --she was a point person for them to continue
to ring the drums of war. To keep the drums of war.
Capt May: Yes, she did the leg work between the flat
assertion that there were evil Moslem terrorists who had knocked down
the towers to the realization of an invasion of
. So Judith Miller was working one half for Israeli interests, because
the war as we say is a Yiddish-British axis. Half the interests are
Israeli geo-political interests, killing the Moslems off to control
the Middle East . And the other half
was U.S. corporate interests and of course
those corporate interests are represented fully in the modern mega
media which as you know fewer and fewer people are owning more and
more of. So she was a pinup girl for the war cabal. She was somebody
whom they put journalistic integrity on by giving her a Pulitzer for
writing propaganda pieces about Al Qaeda, who then they believed and
gave to the front page of the Chronicle. And I like I say,
she was a total thug to the military. Her view was that the military
would jump and get in line and no one is going to make arguments or
I will go straight back to the White House. So it is not at all surprising
that she was involved in what we call the July Jumble of 2003 where
Joe Wilson published an Op Ed, and by the way I published an OpEd
in the Houston Chronicle two days later, July 8th, both attacking
the Bush war plan. Joe Wilson wound up with his life exposed the 14th
of July, and I wound up in the underground the 17th of July, eight
hours before Dr. David Kelly wound up killed. So that is the kind
of journalistic climate that these people are now throwing a heroic
journalist First Amendment defender award on Judith Miller for, and
it is just outrageous.
then set the stage for one of May’s most surreal and paranoid
experiences in the Info War.
May: Now the most outrageous thing for me may be that I asked
a flat out question to Thom Shanker, my media contact during July.
I asked him whether or not they had been given security clearances,
meaning whether or not they had been allowed to have access to secret
material in exchange for a promise to control their reporting and
make it conform to the government line. And he flat out told me no.
And that is the only time I have caught him in a flat out lie. Usually
journalists are good enough liars to lie their way around it without
doing it directly.
LB: And just for our audience, he is a --what is
his connection to the media?
Capt May: He is the chief Pentagon correspondent
for the New York Times.
Capt May: So he is part of the same apparatus of
propaganda that was intended to sell this war. Now he got scared as
the Dickens when David Kelly got killed. Valerie Plame was outed.
When all hell broke loose in July of 2003 after Joe Wilson and I published
our OpEds, and David Kelly was busted by the Ministry of Defense,
all of this being the first week of July. Thom Shanker, the next time
I called him, late July, the 29th I believe, he was so scared Lenny
of what was going down --because this was right after the assassinations
of the third week of July-- that the minute that he got my call, my
language was none too genteel, at first he made little excuses about
journalistic integrity, "We have standards this time, I can't
talk about it," and then he said, "Captain May!" and
then I said, "Damn right it is Captain May!" and I used
some more choice words. And immediately Thom Shanker went into Russian.
And we talked about the U.S. Constitution, the war cabal, and his
being scared to death for fifteen minutes in Russian. And I thought
of all the surreal moments of a surreal mission of conscience that
I have been on, the idea that a top reporter for the New York
Times, dealing with the Pentagon beat, would be talking to an
American officer on a mission of conscience, and that they would have
to talk Russian to be able to talk with any security about what was
going on in the United States of America, I mean, that is beyond Orwell,
LB: Yes, absolutely.
to May, “During our conversation, [Shanker]
kept saying, `I’m scared. I’m scared to death. They’re
killing people.’ He was talking about the Bush people.”
up Shanker’s fears, in “Dark
Lord of the Ring?” on Friday, March 13, 2009, Keith
Olbermann of MSNBC discussed with Howard Fineman of MSNBC the recent
public disclosures by investigative reporter Seymour Hersh that Dick
Cheney ran his own assassination ring.
Dick Cheney was in charge of a covert executive assassination
ring approved by President Bush, but unknown to Congress, of which
Cheney was the creator and director--in blatant opposition to the
Ford Presidential executive order still standing prohibiting U.S. administration
involvement in covert executions. According to Hersh, "hit"
orders were issued from the office of V.P. Cheney and agents reported
back to him personally and not to the President. Congress was not
included in any of the activities, nor did they have knowledge of
these covert, criminal actions, according to Hersh.
It's a special wing of our special operations community that is set
up independently. They do not report to anybody except in, in the
Clinton , in the uh, Bush-Cheney days, they
reported directly to the Cheney, Cheney office. They do not report
to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or to Mr. [Robert] Gates,
the Secretary of Defense. They report directly to him. They are, uh,
uh, they have absolutely no. Congress has absolutely no oversight
of it. It's an executive assassination ring essentially that has been
going on and on and on. And just today in the Times there was a story
saying that its, its leader, a three star Admiral named [William H.]
McRaven, ordered a stop to certain activities because there were so
many collateral deaths. It's been going into, in -- under President
Bush's authority --they've been going into countries, not talking
to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on
a list and executing them and leaving. That's been going on, well,
in the name of all of us.
nights previously, in a Minnesota forum, Seymour
Hersh commented, “"They ran a government within the government,"
adding "eight or nine neo-conservatives took over our country."
a subsequent Olbermann interview with former Nixon advisor John
Dean, claimed there were reports that Donald Rumsfeld also operated
his own assassination ring as well.
Madsen also reported
an earlier version of this story in the March 11, 2005 Online
Journal. He called
Cheney’s unit “Task Force 121.”
number of intelligence sources have reported that assassinations of
foreign leaders like [former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik] Hariri
and [Lebanese Christian leader Elie] Hobeika are ultimately authorized
by two key White House officials, Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove
and Deputy National Security Adviser Elliot Abrams. In addition, Abrams
is the key liaison between the White House and Sharon's office for
such covert operations, including political assassinations.
is the guy they [the Israelis] go to for a wink and a nod for such
ops,' reported one key source."
does not take a great deal of imagination to see how a private assassination
force being used abroad could also be used at home.
his 18 Oct 2005 Cloak and Dagger interview, May described how Judith
Miller played a key role in disseminating its lies about bogus weapons
of mass destruction to justify the invasion of Iraq . Her stories
made the front pages around the country. She also participated in Bush covert operations
as a false victim. The
power elite awarded her the Pulitzer
Prize to give her false credibility.
According to May, she exploited her special security clearance
system for journalist, using it to trump other journalists. May also
believes that she betrayed confidential contacts directly to the White
Capt May: OK, well the
height of chutzpah is that Judith Miller is going to be receiving
some kind of prize from the New York Times for valiant defense
of the First Amendment. And that will be given to her, or was given
to her, today. And that is the best thing --you know Lenny, I studied
Russian and used to translate Russian media for the U.S. Army when
I was in intelligence, and that is the kind of crap that they used
to do, where they take someone as guilty as sin dipped in misery and
put a gold star on them and say that somehow they are a hero.
Capt May: If you look back at it, Judith Miller,
and we call her Judas Miller in Ghost Troop
Capt May: Judas Miller, she is saying she is defending
the First Amendment freedom of speech, but the fact of the matter
is she was really pleading the Fifth Amendment when she went to jail
saying that she wouldn't talk. Because if she told a tenth of what
she knows and what they did through her to America
, she would be standing trial for treason today.
LB: Let us go into it. What did she do? What did
she do that was treasonous?
Capt May: Let us take it all back from the start,
Lenny. She was one of the journalists that they selected to get those
magic Anthrax letters that we thought at the time were made by Al
Qaeda, but it turned out at the time were manufactured at Fort Dietrich,
Capt May: That set Judith Miller --Judas Miller--
up for being the victim, and being a sympathetic figure while she
was in bed with the White House. You might say she was the queen of
the embedded journalists, because from the day she got that letter,
Judith Miller started writing, first off, expose stories about Al
Qaeda, and then she got a sympathetic Pulitzer Prize from the American
Judas journalist society, the Pulitzer people. For basically making
a high step propaganda argument.
Capt May: Then we find out that all the way on the
lead up to the war it turned out that Judith Miller had a security
clearance, meaning that she was allowed to know official military
secrets but was not allowed to tell her editor where she got them.
So she had carte blanche, she had a total open slate--
LB: Is that is a security clearance from the American
--what, the Pentagon? What is it?
Capt May: Yes, it is issued through the military.
And what it does is it says you can know secrets or top secrets, but
remember the old joke, "If you tell anybody, we have got to kill
Capt May: So she was allowed to know things, but
even her editors and publishers could not ask her how she knew them
or where she knew them. That is shameful journalism you know for an
editor not to have the right to question a journalist, but I think
with the New York Times it was pretty much that they didn't
want to know where she got it. They wanted to keep her separate from
them. But they knew what she was doing. She was using the front page
of the New York Times to drum up the war propaganda to lead
us into the Middle East .
LB: OK, that is the point. The motive is, get somebody
in the New York Times who can start to drum up the war drums.
Capt May: Sure. And now she has come out I think
on Sunday did a piece for the New York Times about who knew
what and when in which she kind of sort of said that she kind of sort
of got information from all over White House and the upper levels
of the Pentagon, but the truth of the matter is that Judith Miller
was in this from the gitgo. She was from the start an operative. A
quisling journalist who was working to establish a war criteria. And
then we go into the war itself when she was put over in
Iraq and the word I get from people
I know in public affairs is that she acted like Catherine the Great.
She thought she was just the Czarina and she had carte blanche. And
she told people like me, little captains and colonels and even generals
that if they did not jump when she said jump, she would turn them
into the Pentagon and the White House and whatnot. She was a thug.
Part of the intellectual Thuggery that sold this war.
Capt May: When people talk about how Cheney, Rove,
and Libby, boy they play hard ball and they really know how to get
their way, Judith Miller was right in there in bed with them. And
she was their number one girl. So let us go to what happened in July,
now that we know even June 2003, Joe Wilson, the ambassador, had been
trying to publish a piece, which he wound up publishing in the New
York Times, that said that the whole argument about weapons of
mass destruction, specifically uranium, therefore nukes, was bogus.
Contrived. And he investigated it way before Bush ever started selling
that point and told him it was contrived. The first person they went
to was Judith Miller because they knew she was a go-to girl. And they
tried to get her to slam dunk Joe Wilson. Now she has come out with
little half-truths in the New York Times, but the fact of
the matter is, and this is where I start, she is saying that she went
to jail to protect her sources, therefore to protect the first Amendment.
The fact of the matter is that she went to jail to protect her own
butt because she needed the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.
She just covered it up hypocritically and said that she was doing
a great job. But there has never been a more shameful case of Judas
journalism than Judith Miller, because she sold her country out to
paint a picture that simply was not true. And the New York Times,
giving her an award, it just beggars description to use words that
describe how low down that is.
Capt May: Now one of the reasons Judith Miller did
not go along with the Valerie Plame outing, in my opinion, is something
that simply won't be covered, any more than the Anthrax letters, the
bogus 9-11 event, the Ft. Dietrich
anthrax, none of that can be discussed because it is
out of the picture. In the same way they are not going to discuss
what Judith Miller was really busy with in July, and that was she
was setting David Kelly up to be assassinated. You know and I know
Lenny, because we have talked about it, but the last person on earth
David Kelly who "committed suicide" --in reality was suicided
by MI6 --David Kelly, the last person on earth he was in touch with
was Judith Miller.
Capt May: And I have got a feeling that he made the
same mistake that I made at the beginning of the Info War, and you
probably know a lot of people who have made [the same mistake]. We
bought the line that somehow the way to be safe and talk was to get
in touch with the journalists. And the more distinguished and prestigious
the journalist, the safer you were. That is the myth. But the truth
of it is David Kelly was in touch with Judith Miller throughout this
thing, and guess who I think turned him over to Blair?
Capt May: It was Miller.
Capt May: So that takes care of what she was doing
in July. Since then, she has been wiggling and waggling and going
one way and the other and the Times has been trying to distance
itself from her by one means after another. But the fact of the matter
is that when push comes to shove, they are going to cover her tail,
because they can't rat her out anymore than she can rat the White
House out. Everybody's implicated. If Judith Miller says "They
knew what I was doing and they let me," they just wanted me to
have a security clearance so that I could say that they couldn't
check my work, that would be the utter truth. So everybody right now
is covering their own rear end. That is the way this whole war cabal
was set up from the gitgo, Lenny. And there she is right in the middle
of it. So I have --
LB: You think she is a foreign government agent as
Capt May: Let us put it this way, she is Jewish,
but her name doesn't show it, and she is married to the number one
publishing magnate in the United
States . Yes, she is Info War--
LB: Who is she married to?
Capt May: I don't know his name. That is a research
question. But I got that from my book publisher Carol Adler at Dandelion
LB: She is probably an Israeli Mossad agent.
Capt May: Yes, in fact the word I am getting, what
is going around the Internet, and you know I keep my sources the way
you keep your sources, and by the way you are one of my sources, what
is going around the Internet is that she is straight up Operation
Mockingbird material. All the way. And she has lived it out…
Captain May went “underground,” it meant always staying
inside his house, and always keeping his curtains drawn so that he
could not be taken out by a sniper. As mentioned in Chapter One, he had been
through this drill once before when as a high school teacher he identified
a punk gunman to police and was waiting for the little criminal to
get picked up.
go around, the gunmen were more likely to be hardened Special Forces
professional killers, as promised by Col Neil Dennington.
Worse yet, as we will see in the next chapter, the top civilian
law enforcement authority in America who was supposed to reign in
criminals was in fact a leader of the rat pack.
May definitely had a problem. Nevertheless,
he hardly became inactive. In
fact, he became a full blown cyber-activist, busily sending out emails
and further developing his web of contacts and cadre of Internet protestors
who would eventually call themselves “Ghost Troop.”
August 15th, the East Coast got hit with a massive power
outage. The Bush Administration
immediately blamed it on Al Qaeda.
blackout conveniently coincided with the arrival of the 3rd
infantry division back in the U.S.
It also conveniently coincided with Bush’s
visit to the West Coast.
his suspicions that there may have been malevolent motives behind
this blackout, Captain May was influenced by the late independent
Internet journalist Joe Vialls based in Australia
. Vialls dropped hints about having an intelligence
background. He wrote:
most of the world now knows, at precisely 16:11:09 on Thursday 14
August 2003, every electrical device dependant on overhead or below
ground power lines, went completely dead in New
York and across most of eastern America
. So sudden was the massive resistance to flow through the eastern
electrical grid, that 9 nuclear and 13 other power stations were forced
into critical shutdown, and 7 oil refineries stalled in the middle
of the catalytic cracking process. Within minutes, millions
of people felt bewildered and alone, with many suffering severe flashbacks
to the events of 11 September 2001.
completely unawares, the Bush administration said the shutdown had
been caused by a power station "“fire", a claim swiftly
rebutted by the power utilities. Desperate to deflect public attention
away from the possibility of an “attack” on America, the
Bush Administration then said the shutdown was due to a “lightning
strike” at Niagara Falls, a claim immediately scoffed at by
the Canadian Government, which pointed out there wasn’t so much
as a single wisp of cloud within 100 nautical miles of Niagara.
May discussed his suspicions
in his 5 July 2006 Hal Turner interview: (5 July 2006),
May: …Remember that East Coast black out?
I remember, 14-1550 Hours we were without electricity here, and it
was very hot.
Capt May: Well that one was easy for me because I
picked that up at the time for what it was, a classified operation.
That was another Federal false flag attack. That
was a Federal knock down of the power grid. It was a way of Bush flexing
his muscles in the summer of 2003 when everybody knew he had gotten
us into quick sand after promising us an easy war. So when they started
blaming the Madrid bombing [of 3-11-2004] on the same group that did
the East Coast black out --and I knew the East Coast black out was
bogus at the time it happened --that just happened to be one
of the things that was easy for me to understand--all of a sudden
it started clicking for me real fast.
sources have claimed that the blackout was deliberate, such as a Long
Island activist named Michael Kane cited in the PrisonPlanet article
by Oliver Midelson "Joint
Task Force Told Face to Face, Blackout was a Military Test."
May penned a cleverly sarcastic letter on 15 Aug 2003 titled “A
Wake Up Call to New York City” in which he expressed his
strong suspicion –still strong years later—that this was
the first false flag operation he uncovered prior to February 2004
when it finally registered with him that 9-11 was the biggest false
flag operation of them all:
Dear Citizens of New York City ,
three o’clock in the afternoon Eastern Time, Friday, August
15, and Governor George Pataki is thanking President Bush for promising
to pay you back for the costs that have been incurred by the power
outage – only at the end he changed the true word, incurred,
to the cover word, occurred. Pretty smart man, Governor Pataki, to
change his wording like that. You see, I’ve got a pretty good
idea that he was thinking of expenses incurred because nothing just
occurred by chance.
have just participated in a federal crisis exercise, that’s
all, and the governor knows it. I’m just speculating, mind you,
but we Texans are noted for the crazy lengths to which we’ll
go to make a point…There was no terrorist attack against the
Big Apple, so be at ease. It can’t be terrorism when it’s
your own government that’s doing it, and like I said, this was
just an exercise. Relax, you all did fine.
important point to remember: the exercise was not psychological warfare
executed by the commander in chief against the citizens of the nation’s
financial and media capitol. Heck, saying that would be like saying
that you have been tyrannized, and I can assure you that nowadays
no responsible journalist would say a thing like that.
prez just had a little fire drill, that’s all. And anyhow, the
way he timed it was ever so nice, seeing as how you got to take Friday
off and make a three-day weekend of it. I suppose he’ll get
around to telling your media what to tell you about the reasons and
results for the exercise. Maybe not, though; it depends on what he
thinks is best for you….
the emergency test scared you, or if, say, you panicked a little while
you waited in hot elevators and subways, think of the greater public
good. The ends justify the means, after all, and anyway, deaths were
predictably light. I say we need a little crisis now and then to keep
on the Bush Team, and that’s really where all freedom-loving
Americans need to be, just ask the prez. When your country is fighting
a worldwide war, you have to stay together at all costs. And anyway,
like your governor said, the feds will pick up the costs. Thankfully,
you have a born-in-Connecticut Texan to tell you what’s really
important in a climate of crisis. Shucks, the prez loves you like
a big brother.
should we start having blackout drills all over the country, maybe
even have a nation-wide one for Halloween night? Naw, I guess it wouldn’t
be as much fun now that it has already been done once. This trick-or-treat
caper had to be a surprise! You got the trick, (especially the folks
who died, RIP), but it should be a real treat for big energy, which
isn’t making nearly as much money as it thought it would in
Iraq. Thankfully, it will now have plenty to do here at home. This
crisis exercise will convince most Americans that the silly people
energy industries must get out of the way. I’m talking
about people like environmentalist and peace activists, actors and
editors with un-American activities going on. It was Barry Goldwater
who said it, but it is the prez who’s proving it to the world:
“Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.” Leftwing
paranoia about the right course of action has to be suppressed at
all costs. We’re in the middle of a worldwide war, after all.
May is a former Army Intelligence and Public Affairs officer.
served on the general staff of the US Army’s 75th Division