IDEOLOGY AND ETHICS SURVEY
Additional Commentary and References
||Why have white conservatives been so ineffective in America?
||One perspective on an ethical issue:
An opposing perspective on the same ethical issue:
|Conservatives wisely pull punches be-
|They are too focused on limited issues
||cause white nationalism is untenable
rather than restoring full white sovereignty
|They wisely support Zionism over
Too many are weaklings who allow Jews
||their own interests to remain "moral"
to saddle them with Holocaust guilt
|They benefit from "diversity" by en-
They have been infiltrated by Judas Goats
||listing former Trotskyite neo-con Jews
Also, wealthy whites have been apathetic
Sample argument: Ever since the end of World War II, the unwritten rule among New World Order globalists has generally been "the white man shall not win any more wars against nonwhites." Therefore, the French had to lose in Algeria and Indochina, Britain lost India, Aden, Kenya, Hong Kong, Singapore, and other colonies, whites lost self-rule in Rhodesia, and South Africa, and America fought no-win wars in Korea and lost in Vietnam. In 1999 America's Jewish General Wesley Clark commented about the Balkan wars: "There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That is a 19th-century idea, and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states." Therefore conservatives must stay with the trend and not buck it, regardless of the likely horrific long term consequences for white survival. Since Zionist neo-cons were powerful enough to drag America into the Iraqi War (see High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper), and because they are also supported by major Zionist national media control (see The New Jerusalem by MCP), any form of direct protest or other resistance must be futile. Therefore, capitulate. Realize that Zionist financial might always makes right. If you cannot beat them, join them. In contrast to traditional American values favoring respect for private property, limited government, and avoidance of aggressive war, ally yourself with former Trotskyite Jews who call themselves "neo-cons." Go ahead and support global militarism, aggressive foreign wars, spendthrift ever-expanding big government, affirmative action, out of control Third world immigration, and white dispossession. Ever since the War Between the States, American "conservatism" has been a pathetic rearguard action, generally adopting whatever positions constituted "liberalism" twenty years before. You must always allow conservatism to become ever more limited in the issues it addresses. You should accept the way it becomes increasingly contradictory and ridiculous relative to original traditional American conservative values. Don't even warn fellow Americans about the coming economic collapse if this risks making anyone feel non-kosher.
|. . .
Sample argument: One of the biggest problems with conservatives in America today is that they tend to focus on limited issues such as busing, school prayer, and abortion to the exclusion of a much bigger picture. After these activists make noise on certain issues, they then tend to call it quits. Instead of this, the ultimate goal of conservatism should be to perfect the popular sovereignty of ones own people, even if this means forming a nation within a nation. One may even need to be prepared to form a separate nation or launch paramilitary counter strikes in retaliation for unavenged acts of violence against ones own people. The fulfillment of vital nationalist objectives may require one to risk his life as well as expend time and money, since he may have to defend his group against militant predatory or parasitic hegemony by other groups. This is what it means to be a real "working conservative." Even if one is in a job situation where it is impractical to be an openly militant nationalist, one should at least be providing proxy support to those who can better afford to come out in the open. Someone has to explicitly educate ones own people. Anything short of this is betrayal and decadence. A major reason why America is in such sad shape today is because all of the real substance of popular sovereignty, to include genuinely representative government and the maintenance of an authentic European racial and cultural identity, has been eroded out from underneath most white Americans and replaced with various forms of empty promises, lies, myths, and illusion. They have become disorganized and anemic in the face of Jewish supremacist aggressors such as the ADL who are trying to take away the last of their First Amendment rights. They are also misled by jingoists and Judas Goats (please see the book by this title by Michael Collins Piper) who only advocate a very selectively edited and political correctness spin-doctored form of patriotism and nationalism. Until wimpy white Americans start getting some real nationalist hair back on their chests and learn how to stand up to Jewish supremacists and other aliens, America will continue to go to hell. Don't give up the ship, we have just yet begun to fight.
The core issue behind this question is
the extent to which an ethical system can become
compartmentalized, rationalized, or accommodationist
that is really soft road to the suicide. This
would be analogous to a form of medical treatment
that superficially addresses some symptoms rather
than the true nature of a very serious growing
underlying disease. By diverting attention, a
superficial treatment can actually serve as a
dangerous decoy. It can create a false sense of
security, and waste
valuable time and resources while a disease grows
out of control. Hence, it can have destructive
Ethical behavior typically involves engaging in
various forms of behavior that places the long
term welfare of ones society, family, and self
short term gratification.
A vital part of ethical behavior involves protecting
the ethnic-genetic interests of ones own people. This is a
concept that is very difficult for most white Americans today
to grasp, especially since we live in a "melting pot" society
whose Jewish supremacist dominated national media has made
a false virtue of multi-culturalism, multiracialism, and race-mixing.
Therefore, let me take a moment to go back through the A-B-C's
regarding why it is important to protect ones ethnic-genetic
interests. A good starting point is the January 1991 American
Renaissance article "Why
Nations Fight" by William Robertson Boggs . It
observes that " Men fight because there is nothing more horrible
cultural and national obliteration." It
also observes how, "America is losing, without a struggle,
the very thing that nations have always fought to protect."
And why is this? It is because when people cannot defend their
ethnic genetic interests before other more dynamic and cohesive
groups, they not only lose their sovereignty (that is, their
capacity to determine their own destiny), but they also wind
up as a
dispossessed and dependent subculture of an alien group. Throughout
history, being a minority beholden to an alien majority has
never been much fun. In the work place, one tends to be "last
hired, first fired." In the political arena, one frequently
dares not speak what he really thinks for fear of reprisals
an alien majority with different values . (As an example, if
I were a member of Christian minority living in Jewish-supremacist-dominated
Israel, I would be fearful of professing in public how I really
Jewish white slavery, and other issues that might otherwise
be considered fairly normal discourse within certain Northern
European societies). In
more extreme cases, being a member of a minority means facing
the real possibility of getting genocided. See,
for example, the article "Are We the Kurds of the Future?"
We should also keep in mind many academic arguments which directly
tie in ethical behavior with the need to both preserve and
advance ethnic-genetic interests. Four major examples
immediately come to mind:
First , we have the works of the late British anthropologists
Sir Arthur Keith, such as A New Theory of Evolution. In essence,
human evolution has involved competition between human tribal
units, which has in turn aided the upward evolutionary path
towards more fit societies. This is somewhat analogous to the
way in one typically finds within small
businesses a greater capacity for innovation and productivity
than one generally finds within
large, integrated, bureaucratized corporations.
The maintenance of EBD's (Evolutionary
Breeding Units, in Keith's jargon), has enabled groups to
preserve their genetic advantages without diluting them away. Therefore,
racist instincts continue in human groups because
they have historically conferred survival and dominance advantages.
(The way in which Jewish supremacist-dominated national media
has brainwashed most white Americans into giving up their racial
identity has been a parasitic historical anomaly).
Please also note the article "Zoological Subspecies in Man"
describes how "racism" is found in virtually all mammalian
species, therefore is not only adaptive as a genetic trait
within certain human groups.
We also know that people usually do not
want to let their friends down. Therefore,
individuals with an
ethnic identity are more likely to be on their good ethical
behavior to avoid tarnishing their group image than individuals
are thoroughly atomized and have no racial or ethnic identity
at all. Furthermore, individuals with a strongly felt tribal
identity --which is in essence an extended familial feeling--
are more likely to engage in the social cooperation necessary
to overcome severe stresses, to include genocidal invasion
by foreigners and various forms of domestic tyranny.
In Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America,
Tom Chittum points out that there is a terrible downside
such as America that try to ignore the time-tested rules
of ethnic-genetic competition and instead create utopian
leftist societies that completely ignore race and ethnicity
(except for special privileged status granted to Jews and
Israel and other favored "minorities.") Once a
dominant ethnic group drops below 75% of the total population
of a country, history shows that the odds of major instability
and even fissioning apart within that country begins to skyrocket.
Third, we have Sociobiology: The New Synthesis by
Dr. Edward Wilson which shows how traits such as altruism
to be genetically
reproduced within the same group that gives rise to them
in order for them to survive. We also learn how in the long
everything is genetic. This "plasticity" in human behavior
that we call "learning" is itself highly genetic in origin.
As a fourth example, Dr. Raymond Cattell explains in A
New Morality From Science: Beyondism how in the long
run we can evaluate all human ethical behavior in terms of
ultimately eugenic (increases genetic fitness) or dysgenic
(decreases genetic fitness). This makes sense once we appreciate
the long run importance of individualized and group genetic
explained in sociobiology.
Cattell's insights help us understand
better futuristic articles such as "The New Victorians"
by William S. Lind which prophesy an eventual return in America
to 19th century traditional American conservative
values. Sooner or a later whites will have to return to values
which promote ethnic loyalty, prudent race-loyal mate selection,
and personal racial honor --or else perish.
Cattell's insights also help us understand that ethnic-genetic
competition, even in a subtle peace time environment, can
still comprise a form of war by other means. When an ethnic
group finds itself becoming submerged, it needs to engage
tactics reminiscent of military insurgent operations if it
is to survive. This includes the need to wage a struggle
by proxies. Those people who cannot afford to fight out in
at least support proxies and spread truthful information
among their own people in privacy.
PARASITIC COUNTERFEIT SUBSTITUTION FOR GENUINE CONSERVATISM
There are many ideological approaches that give people the
feeling that they are "doing something" to protect their
interests. At the same time, these ideologies tend to blind
people towards the need to protect their own ethnic-genetic
are some examples:
Marxism: Named after the son of a rabbi, this ideology emphasizes
class struggle and totally repudiates the reality of ethnic
Liberal Christianity. Like Marxism, another ideology of racelessness
invented by crafty Jews for gentile consumption. This
posits that men of all different ethno-racial groups have
before a higher being and hence tends to promote social leftism.
Strom wrote an excellent article about how the liberalized
Dutch Reform Church of South Africa sold out South African
whites and led the country to black Marxist rule disaster. Please
also see the works of William Gayley Simpson, such as Which
Way Western Man? that explain how Christianity is in many
ways simply a religious version of the philosophical leftism that
is also found on a secular level in Marxism
Holocaustianity. Another slick Jewish promotion. This is
the idea that Jewish suffering was so horrendous during World
II that it takes primacy over the suffering over all other
peoples, and that furthermore all whites must feel an eternal
burden of guilt and shame for the "anti-semitic" activities
of certain whites in a certain historical era. Any form of
white nationalism is morally repugnant because it might potentially
lead to another holocaust of Jews, therefore whites should
not be allowed to experience any form of white nationalism.
Neo-conservatism. This is basically a high-jacking of traditional
American conservatism by Jewish former Trotskyites and Big
Government-CIA aficionados such as William F. Buckley in
the wake of World War II. It is basically whatever is left
of American conservatism after it is filtered to support
Big Federal Government in perpetual Cold War (now in perpetual
"War on Terror") and also after maintaining staunch support
for whatever serves the best interests of Jews, Israel, and
Zionism, even if all of this is directly contrary to America's
Michael Collins Piper does an excellent job of covering false
flag ideologies and movements in The Judas Goats, so I will
defer to him further discussion on this topic. Also, please
read "Why Conservatives Can't Win" by the late Dr. William
Return to question 27
Proceed to commentary for question 28