American conservative movements typically look like the "pushmi-pullyu" creature in the Doctor Dolittle children's stories illustrated above, with anarcho-libertarians pulling against racial nationalists, and vice versa. Most white American are confused about where to draw the line in defense of both personal liberties and group ethnic-genetic interests. (Photo found here)

Reconciling
Libertarianism
and Nationalism

To include thorny issues involved in reconciling
anarcho-libertarianism with racial nationalism.

by William B. Fox
Publisher, America First Books
Last updated 10 Sept 2010

Can we reconcile the anarcho-libertarian theory espoused by Lew Rockwell (left photo), Dr. Thomas D. Lorenzo, Dr. Thomas Woods, the late Dr. Murray Rothbard, and other intellectuals connected with the Mises Institute with the white racial nationalist philosophy espoused by the late Dr. William L. Pierce (right photo), late Dr. Revilo Oliver, or currently by Willis Carto, Dr. David Duke and Kevin Strom? ...To borrow an "Obama-ism" -- YES WE CAN!

The American Revolution was about libertarian decentralization not only on a political level against the British Empire, but also in many cases on a tactical military level. Col. Isaac Shelby exhorted militia before the Battle of Kings Mountain: "When we encounter the enemy, don't wait for a word of command. Let each of you be your own officer, and do the best you can..." This battle became a major patriot victory and turning point in the war. Shelby went on to become the first and fifth Governor of the U.S. state of Kentucky. Paradoxically, George Washington's Army went in the opposite philosophical direction. (Artist concept of Col. Isaac Shelby courtesy of Kings Mountain National Military Park plaque).

It is very important that we are consciously aware of the full nature of this ideological conflict, because enemies who control major national media frequently try to steer us to into false paradigms in order to narrow our options, waste our time, create blind spots, or confuse our priorities by inducing us to form unnatural alliances and create unnatural enemies. Examples of unnatural alliances might include racial integration or multi-cultural working class unity against ones own racial and national survival. Creating unnatural enemies might include destroying the family by exacerbating conflict between men and women through Marxist feminism. Truth be told, people are naturally tribal. They have been this way throughout their entire evolutionary history for millions of years as hominids. People naturally tend to want to associate with like-minded people who share their racial and ethnic background. In addition, men and women naturally tend to fall in love, work in harmony, have children, and foster family values.

One of the biggest problems with "libertarianism" in America today is that many of its main advocates like Congressman Ron Paul refuse to openly confront the racial and ethnic dimensions behind Zionist power in America. The behavior of most leading Zionists typically shows contempt for the U.S. Constitution and genuine libertarian principles on an emotional as well as intellectual level. Please see my extended discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my online "Mutualism vs. Parasitism" article. See also the Rev. Ted Pike archive regarding nonstop Jewish ADL efforts to destroy free speech.

A January 2009 scene from the "Pots and Pans Revolution" in Iceland, a land with longstanding libertarian traditions. Over the long run, nationalist policies are necessary to protect Icelandic libertarian traditions as well as to help keep Iceland Icelandic.

AMERICAN
LIBERTARIAN THINKERS
AND MEDIA LEADERS

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: Often called "the Father of Reaganomics," he was once a former high level insider (see bio) during the Reagan administration. Dr. Roberts has since done excellent work in documenting economic policies that have eroded America's industrial base. He has also covered America's transition towards the police state. For "mainstream moderates" who read Fortune, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and other "mainstream media," Dr. Roberts' discussions of economic issues provide an excellent introduction point to prepare people for more radical thinkers like Dr. Murray Rothbard and Dr. Hans Hermann-Hoppe below --or even Dr. William Pierce. Dr. Robert's 24 March 2010 "sign off" article "Truth Has Fallen and Has Taken Liberty With It" got a lot of people feeling depressed, but I am more optimistic. Having been both a real estate and stock broker and repeatedly seen both individual businesses and overall markets go through extreme cycles -where often the coldest part of the night is an hour before dawn -- I am impressed with the "cyclicality" of just about everything, to include "imperial cycles" on a macro-political and historical level. Eventually there will be a new dawn. Nation-states will some day form out of the U.S. rubble (just like they formed out of the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia) and sanity and healthy nationalism will some day return to North America. Many anarcho-libertarians probably should feel depressed, because their view of the world is so limited that they keep beating their heads against a wall, expecting people to be "reasonable" in areas where most of the time they are really ruled by emotion and instinct. They also act as if longstanding anti-Nordic genocide in America does not matter, when in fact it really does. One argument for the creation and maintenance of smaller countries (or the return of serious "State's Rights" in America) is the fact that in even in a "democracy" with a "free press," large segments of the population have problems intelligently and decisively responding to sophisticated threats like Zionist "Info War" (to include "false flag" operations) and they need their own territory, folk culture, and nation state as "training wheels" to help preserve their long term ethnic-genetic interests. Living in a pluralist, imperial society where nobody cares any more about protecting their ethnic-genetic interests and core indigenous values seems to create an even worse problem, namely everybody becomes too fractured, selfish, and amoral to prevent the most psychopathic mafias (like Zionists) and individuals (Bill Clinton and George W. Bush) from rising to the top. It happened in the ancient Roman and Babylonian empires, and it has happened here in America as well. Most people seem to prefer to go about their daily lives unconcerned about macro social and political issues even when faced with terrible dangers, although admittedly some racial and ethnic groups (like Icelanders) seem to be more effective at intelligent grass roots democratic action than others. Links: Articles archive at vdare.com; archive at lewrockwell.com. More recent articles than the "sign off" article archived at Globalresearch.ca, include June 2, 2010 article: "A Plague Upon The World: The USA is a `Failed State Interview with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts." Dr. Robert's articles archive at Vdare.com now has the 31 July 2010 article "Let Them Eat Cake," and his 26 July 2010 article "The Year America Dissolved." Welcome back, Dr. Roberts.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

 

Dr. Murray Rothbard: A Jewish renegade who was rejected from Ayn Rand's atheistic Jewish inner circle in Manhattan because he married a Christian wife, Murray Rothbard once quipped "All stereotypes are true." Dr. Rothbard did considerable work resurrecting Old Right paleoconservatism, although he filtered much of it from a Jewish-friendly, anarcho-libertarian perspective. Dr. Rothbard produced iconoclastic histories such as The Great Depression, which showed how the Federal Reserve created the very economic malaise it was allegedly designed to avoid. His article "Generalissimo Washington: How He Crushed the Spirit of Liberty" dovetails nicely with my discussion of Dr. Thomas Woods and the relationship of George Washington vs. the anti-Federalists below. Rothbard's Conceived in Liberty underscores what he considered to be a defining aspect of the "American experience," namely that during the colonial era, settlers in places like Pennsylvania grew in population to the size of many small European states, yet they got along perfectly well managing their own affairs at a local level without hardly any central government by European standards. In fact, without the overhang of various classes of political and religious "rent-seekers," they discovered that they were much happier and more prosperous. What Murray Rothbard does not mention is that many of these colonists, to include English Puritans in New England, Dutch in New York, German Lutherans in Pennsylvania, and Scots-Irish on the frontier, retained a quaint European folk culture and other forms of social fabric that fostered moral order on the local level. In addition, many of them consisted of Nordic and closely related Celtic peoples who had already manifested libertarian instinctive tendencies and self-sufficiency back in the Old Country. See, for example, my discussion of Iceland as a model libertarian society during the medieval period. Rothbard provided many valuable libertarian analyses regarding labor markets. He argued that the major force for driving up wages over the long run in a society is the ability of entrepreneurial businesses to increase productivity and offer better products, which in turn gives them an incentive to raise wages to attract better people. This complements the view of Eumonn Fingleton in In Praise of Hard Industries: Why Manufacturing, Not the Information Economy, Is the key to Future Prosperity, namely that only the manufacturing sector has the ability to infinitely scale up productivity and wages over the long run, not the service sector. In contrast, unions that focus simply on increasing benefits for themselves regardless of productivity gains wind up killing the golden geese that lay the golden eggs. Rothbard also pointed out many interesting historical anomalies in his lectures. For example, he claims that many colleagues at Columbia University who originally started out with an extremely socialistic, pro-union orientation later concluded, after extensive studies of union-related economic statistics, that unions tend to "throw sand in the gears of change" and can constitute a "war of the working class against the working class" by driving up wages for those fortunate enough to belong to unions, but increasing unemployment among those outside the union structure.who employers can no longer afford to hire because of higher wage scales. Rothbard also observed that a main force behind the creation of the South African apartheid system were not some kind of "right wing" Afrikaners, but by white communist unionists who wanted to prevent blacks from taking their jobs. It is worth noting that politics makes strange bedfellows in other ways. While it is true that Communists and Nationalists are usually at each other's throats, there have been unusual historical situations where they have been closer on certain issues than so-called "moderates." For example, in the 1990's, Russian communists and nationalists were closer in opposing Zionist oligarchs than Russian "moderates." There is also an interesting photo in Adolf Hitler by John Toland showing Communist and Nazi flags mixed together hanging out of apartment windows during a 1920's renter's strike in Germany. Lastly, in the 1960's, American old Right libertarian nationalists (paleoconservatives) were just as opposed to America's interventionism in Vietnam as the far left, albeit for different rhetorical reasons, using code words like disdain for "foreign entanglements," "large standing armies," and "self-aggrandizing government" rather than "imperialism," "oppression of the masses," and "racism." Having had some personal experience working with unions, I do not want to knock them too hard here. In fact, on a broad theoretical level they are consistent with many of my pro-nationalist views, namely the right of people to organize themselves to protect their own vital interests. Unions can be extremely effective in handling abusive employers --of whom there are many -- and defending vital political and economic interests. Many of the AFL-CIO-affiliated union local leaders I had personal contact with in the State of Washington were conscious of the need to keep benefit increases in line with productivity gains. In my view, America needs even more grass roots organizing to defend both political and economic interests, not less, so long as these things are done in an intelligent manner. Dr. Murray Rothbard is one of the very few relatively honest Jews I can respect and admire. If more Jews were like him, we probably would not have so many problems. Links: Rothbard File at LewRockwell.com, articles archive at Mises.org. Online literature at Mises.org includes classics such as Conceived in Liberty (PDF), On Liberty, What Has Government Done to Our Money?, and The Great Depression. Mises Institute MP3 Archive include discussion of union economics, Austrian theory of business cycle.

Dr. Murray Rothbard (1926-1995)

 

Lew Rockwell, President of the Mises Institute, has been a very effective popularizer of the libertarian insights of the founders of the Austrian School of economics created by Karl Menger (a gentile) and later redacted by Ludwig von Mises (a Jew) and Murray Rothbard (a Jew). Rockwell's works are pithy and to the point for American readers who may lack the time and inclination for Dr. Rothbard's more academic approach. Considering how American conservatism was completely knocked down for the count by decades of brainwashing from leftist, pro-big government and pro-central bank Jewish controlled national media by the early 1990's, and how the Internet Revolution still lay beyond the horizon, Lew Rockwell's decision during this period to simply focus on the libertarian side and pay enough lip service to Jewish redactors to get major Jewish funding was probably a shrewd, practical, and disciplined decision given the realities at the time. It was hard enough to reach a mass audience with either a coherent libertarian or a racial nationalist message, and probably even more difficult to do both simultaneously. It seems like only Zionist neocons and Jewish pressure organizations like the ADL and SPLC had lots of money. Most everybody else was starving. Without question there are quite a few areas where Rockwell and his libertarian colleagues hit home runs. One clear area involves explaining how Frederic Bastiat's "Fallacy of the Broken Window" applies on a general macroeconomic level, to include the overall impact of war, natural disasters, and other catastrophes. See also Professor Mark Thornton's lecture "What Thrives and Dies During War." Harry Hazlitt observed in his classic Economics in One Lesson that despite all efforts to explode this fallacy, it always continually resurfaces in national media and the pronouncements of leading politicians. Another "home run" area involves showing how increasingly levels of central planning and other forms authoritarianism tends to produce increasingly levels of inefficiency, economic mismanagement, and corruption over time. Rockwell, Rothbard, Hoppe and other colleagues demonstrate how both central government and central bank interventionism tend to do more to distort the economy, promote mal-investment, discourage productive savings and investment, undermine the growth of real productivity, and otherwise do more damage than good to the economy over the long run. This is also contrary to what one typically reads in mainstream media and hears from leading politicians, but it is true. A major reason why central bankers and Big Government politicos have pushed Keynesianism and other snake oil economic creeds on the public is because at root most of them are shameless "rent-seekers" (if not outright criminals) who shameless exploit the police power of the state and milk its prestige to get something for nothing for themselves. (See the free online book Keynes at Harvard: Economic Deception as a Political Credo by Zygmund Dobbs of the Veritas Foundation which explains how a leading university got infiltrated and corrupted by false dogmas perpetrated by leading central bankers and big government bureaucrats who provide major donations). Although I generally admire Lew Rockwell's work, my main reservation with both himself and his colleague Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo is the way they keep pushing free trade ideology long after conservatives like Dr. Paul Craig Roberts have woken up to its fallacies. "Free trade" has become a libertarian religious icon. Theoretically, if true libertarianism returns to America, then grass roots racial nationalism will reemerge as "spontaneous order" (to use a Hayekian phrase) because people are naturally tribalistic. However, it will be a cold day in hell when Zionists ever voluntarily permit their white gentile vassals in America to reorganize themselves by ethnicity, since historically ethnic groups comprise the most potent resistance forces against tyranny --to include the Jewish-flavored varieties. See my commentary for quiz question 13 "Does ethnic solidarity matter in defense of liberty?" for my "Have You Been Brainwashed? Quiz. In reality, American anarcho-libertarianism is a very strange animal that helps create the very monsters it subsequently offers itself as the only solution to get under control. By encouraging extreme individualism, people become so selfish and atomized they are incapable of serving as adequate "counter-predators" against unrestrained growth of government, out of control Third World immigration, and Zionist criminal mafias. Then after out-of-control government starts stepping on everyone, anarcho-libertarians act as if they are the only ones who fully comprehend these abuses of power, while generally ignoring outrages committed by Jews and other aliens because they remain ideologically willfully blind to racial and ethnic differences. Lew Rockwell links: Lew Rockwell's articles archive at lewrockwell.com Mises Institute MP3 Archve

Lew Rockwell, 8 May 2009 on Infowars, "We Are Now Nazi Germany"

The Obama Deception by Alex Jones. In March 2009, three months after our Lone Star Iconoclast Alert listed in Chapter 35 of the Mission of Conscience Trilogy, Alex Jones released his landmark documentary: The Obama Deception which has a very similar viewpoint. 1:51:21 Here is one web site overview: "The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working for the best interests of the American people. The Obama phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery. We have reached a critical juncture in the New World Order's plans. and only by exposing the con can we help to save freedom in America. The Obama Deception is not about Left or Right: it's about a One World Government. The international banks plan to loot the people of the United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation. Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he has told, and his real agenda, and how his initial appointments and actions prove he serves the corporate oligarchs, not the American people." See also: Review: The Obama Deception by Alex Jones March 15, 2009

 

Alex Jones is a major leader of Austin, Texas-based electronic media resistance against "The New World Order" along with John Stadtmiller of Republic Broadcasting Network (depicted further down this page). He has played an important role in reaching millions of Americans about such threats as repeat 9/11-type false flag attacks, loss of American sovereignty before New World Order cabals, carbon tax and global warming frauds, food and water additive poisoning, economic melt-down in America, creation of the police state control grid, and genocidal global depopulation plans by a totally corrupt power elite. He admits that he cannot watch any mainstream media television shows or movies any more without feeling like he is being bombarded with poisonous embedded messages that try to intimidate Americans out of waking up to the New World Order. Jones has been ably assisted by the research and articles of Paul Joseph Watson and Kurt Nimmo. His documentaries have had a powerful effect in reaching a mass audience of millions of people. They include Food: The Ultimate Secret Exposed (July 2010), Don't Tread on Me: Rise of the Republic (May 2010), Police State 4: The Rise of FEMA (April 2010), Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined (produced with Jason Bermas, April 2010), Terror Storm II (Feb 2010, Terror Storm I first released July 2006), Endgame (Nov 2009), Fall of the Republic (Oct 2009), and The Obama Deception (March 2009), 9/11 -The Road to Tyranny (Feb 2007). Jones was executive producer for 9/11 Truth classic Loose Change Final Cut (Feb 2007). While Jones admits that humans are tribal by nature, he thinks they should try to extend their tribal instincts across different racial and ethnic groups. (Who says? Why not use the K.I.S.S. principle and let them start with the group ethnically and genetically closest to themselves first and then build outward from there?) He also uses the term "eugenics" with a very negative connotation and lambastes"Nazi conspiracies." One can argue that the issue of "eugenics" is not that simple, since it is practiced one way or another, either through omission or commission, either consciously or subconsciously. (Many sociobiologists would argue that eugenics is always practiced by virtually everyone to some degree or another at least a subconscious level; for example mate selection is inherently a eugenic decision). The United States Government has spent untold trillions on the greatest negative eugenics program in world history by supporting the accelerated reproduction of people of poor character and low IQ on its welfare programs and also by opening its borders to tidal waves of Third World illegal alien immigrants. (The correct term for "negative eugenics" is "dysgenics." The Jewish power elite generally promotes dysgenics for gentiles while supporting "eugenics" for their own kind, similar to the very ancient PSYOP formula "openly promote leftism among those outside your own tribal group to induce them to drop their guard and become weaker, and quietly encourage rightism among those within your own group to build their cohesion and other forms of tribal strength"). In regard to alleged "Nazi conspiracies," many historians such as David Irving and even Pat Buchanan do not believe that Hitler had a plan to take over the world. He could not even cross the English Channel to take Britain, much less cross the Atlantic to conquer America. Alex Jones is certainly a huge improvement over the overtly pro-Zionist neocon "right wing" talk radio show hosts like Michael Savage (born Jewish as Michael Alan Wiener) and Rush Limbaugh (who takes vacations in Israel) for his willingness to occasionally identify leading Jews such as the Rothschilds, Larry Silverstein, and Henry Kissinger at the top of New World Order cabals. Given the current realities of a thoroughly dumbed-down American public brainwashed by multi-racialism, multiculturalism, Holocaustianity, and Christian Zionist-style Israel worship in mass media, maybe Jones' brand of anarcho-libertarianism is about as far as someone can push the envelop and still reach an American audience in the millions. On top of all this, many people like his persona as a red-blooded, manly "fighting Texan" willing to stand above America's all too abundant masses of effeminized, conformist, wimpy, metro-sexual males, although some may wonder if Jones' stage personality gets a bit "schmaltzy," "showy" and overdone at times, showing a possible Jewish influence on Jones' psyche. Alex Jones has his critics, to be sure, such as the September 9. 2009 article The Alex Jones Deception: False Flag Journalism Discrediting The Truth Movement, Victor Thorn's Hall of Shame at WingTV.net, the Gentile Alliance Jones web page, and Eric Hufschmid's expose page. "Why Is The ADL Promoting Alex Jones?" by Brother Naphanael Kapner, who is a Jewish convert to Christianity, comments: "...Jones, his program, his sites (at least five of them), and through his documentaries are essentially the core of a mass desensitizing operation. When viewing his ‘films,’ most come away feeling as if they’ve been bludgeoned and beaten to near hopelessness. And that, of course, is the very idea. All the talk about ‘taking the country back’ basically runs most people into the ground…and many of them become moribund, disheartened…or just quit. When Jones keeps pounding home the theme about the ALL-powerful Global Elite - but not mentioning that Zionist Jews ARE the great majority of the elite - the message of who is really running the West and America is lost..." The 13 Aug 2010 article Alex Jones promotes Zionist heretics Jeffrey and Missler at the Fitzpatrick Informer comments: "Evidence continues to mount against American radio show host and self-proclaimed patriot Alex Jones that he is a counter-intelligence operative working for the state of Israel..." Many observers feel that Alex Jones' "Hollywood Is Owned by the Arabs (video)" rhetoric, repeatedly as recently as August 2010, is a clear "smoking gun" about his ultimate loyalties. The Rev Ted Pike has weighed in with his 7 Sept 2010 article "An Open Letter to Alex Jones" and his 9 Sept 2010 article Jones to Pike: "Don't Criticize Jews." In the latter article, Pike summarizes: "What I learned, beyond any doubt, was that Alex Jones cannot be depended upon to provide the populist right with all the facts necessary to understand geopolitical reality. If he will censor the truth concerning a threat as dominant and well-documented as Jewish supremacism, what else will he manipulate?" On air, Jones admitted his wife has some Jewish ancestry. A number of people wonder where he gets all the money necessary to fund his productions and wide distribution. Allegedly Jones backed out of an interview with Michael Collins Piper to discuss Final Judgment, although he has repeatedly interviewed Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker of the American Free Press as well as AFP journalist Mark Anderson. In Chapter 10 of my Trilogy, I mention Capt. Eric May's complaint that Alex Jones has ignored his alerts and accused him of being COINTELPRO to Stephen Webster of the Lone Star Iconoclast. Despite negative things said by various detractors about Alex Jones, his ability to reach a mass audience, expose false flag operations, and directly denounce the criminality of the power elite remains impressive. He has is a very intelligent man, with an excellent memory for details and ability to identify inane contradictions that surround us. His work has helped inspire other important alternative electronic media with a similar libertarian bent, such as The Corbett Report run by James Corbett, an expatriot Canadian currently living in Western Japan, and Media Monarchy run by James Pilato (who interviewed this author on 30 July 2009) based in Portland, Oregon. I draw heavily upon many works of Alex Jones, Paul Watson, Kurt Nimmo, and other InfoWar.com associates in my Mission of Conscience Trilogy because of their excellence in certain areas. I quote extensively from his interviews with people like former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, and Birgitta Jonsdottir, Member of Parliament in Iceland. But then again, I am openly and consciously eclectic. An important issue for me remains how to offer the public a positive vision of an alternative society with positive values that I and over like-minded people can work towards without getting drowned in all the ugliness and criminality that the power elite keeps throwing at us. At the beginning of Chapter 37 I talk about how PSYOP approaches like fear mongering and predictive programming can be used as tools by the power elite to intimidate the public into acquiescence. Even Alex Jones admits that educating the public about the terrible things that evil New World Order cabals are trying to do to us can become self-defeating at that point when people become paralyzed with fear or fatalistic. A huge part of the answer for me personally involves trying to rebuild the kind of social fabric and indigenous values that once worked for my own ancestors. Alex Jones' hardline anarcho-libertarianism, where he continually beats his breast about how he does not care at all about race or ethnicity and only judges people as individuals, goes against my own brand of paleoconservativism where I recognize that people act in society both as individuals and as part of groups. In some situations, your skin color becomes your "uniform" whether you want it to be this way or not, such as the well-publicized case during the 1992 Los Angeles riots where an unassuming truck driver got dragged from his cab and beaten to death by a gang of blacks for simply being white. On a more subtle level, I have observed from ten years of "street" experience as a real estate broker and another ten years as stock broker that even various white groups continually discriminate against each other on a covert level based on different temperamental characteristics, different cultures, and historical experiences. Just because a particular topic is totally taboo in current public discussion does not prevent it from remaining a very real factor in human affairs. For example, one taboo topic remains Protestant vs. Catholic conflict, supposedly rendered a "non-issue" by the "melting pot" and enlightened rationalist instruction in our public schools long ago. Yet in big cities like New York, Chicago, and Boston, Italian and Irish Catholics often ally themselves with Jews against WASPs. As Dr. Lothrop Stoddard explained in his landmark 1924 work Racial Realities in Europe, one reason why this conflict is unlikely to ever completely go away is that "Protestantism" has had a high historical correlation with "Nordics," whereas "Catholicism" has had a much higher correlation with various Celtic, Mediterranean, and Alpine branches of Caucasian peoples --and each group has distinctive cognitive, temperamental, and emotional characteristics embedded in their DNA that can make "getting along" a big tricky on certain social, political, and economic issues. Among other things, "Alpines" as a group tend to be much more authoritarian and dogmatic compared to "Nordics," who tend to be more adventurous, individualistic, rationalistic, emotionally distant (often interpreted or misinterpreted by others as "arrogance") and entrepreneurial. See more discussion by Dr. Stoddard in Appendix I of Part 6 of my Iceland Gets "ENRONed" series. Any time the government passes laws to try to eliminate discriminatory behavior, people usually just find a new way to work around the system. Whether you want it to be this way or not, this is the way it is -- human tribalism is a fundamental fact of life that will never go away, so time to get "street smart" and deal with it! Links: Articles archives and video links at: Prisonplanet.com, prisonplanet.tv, infowars.com. Genesis Communications Network: Alex Jones home page and MP3 archive. Honorable mention at Genesis Communications Network: Webster Tarpley's World Crisis Radio. Tarpley is a foremost expert on false flag attacks, geopolitics, and macroeconomic crises. Erskine Overnight. Erskine interviewed this author and Capt. May about the swine flu epidemic. Other Sources: If "Hollywood Is Owned by the Arabs" is too much for you to stomach, but you still want to stay on the libertarian side that avoids racial nationalist interpretations but still exposes Zionists and other corrupt power elites, consider Daryl Bradford Smith at the French Connection at iamthewitenss.com. He has interviewed a lot of good people with a variety of valuable viewpoints -- such as Michael Collins Piper, Bill Murphy of GATA, John Kaminski, Jim Condit, and the late Eustace Mullins.

Alex Jones     From "Why Is The ADL Promoting Alex Jones?" by Brother Naphanael Kapner

 

Pat Buchanan, along with Joseph Sobran, Col Donn de Grand Pre, Dr. Thomas Woods (see below), and John Dalberg-Acton happens to be one of many conservative Catholic intellectuals I can respect and admire. Interestingly enough, Buchanan has been popularizing insights that were well known among American rightist circles for decades, but suppressed by controlled media, such as the The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization (suicidal demographic decline rates of whites) and Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World (or how Allies were at least as much at fault in causing WWII as Adolf Hitler). Consistent with my discussions about WASP dispossession, Buchanan came out with his 14 May 2010 article "Are Liberals Anti-WASP?" about how both WASPs and Catholics are now getting the shaft by the Democratic establishment: ...If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats. Is this the Democrats' idea of diversity? But while leaders in the black community may be upset, the folks who look more like the real targets of liberal bias are white Protestants and Catholics, who still constitute well over half of the U.S. population. Not in living memory has a Democratic president nominated an Irish, Italian or Polish Catholic, though these ethnic communities once gave the party its greatest victories in the cities and states of the North. What happened to the party of the Daleys, Rizzos and Rostenkowskis? And not in nearly half a century has a Democratic president nominated a white Protestant or white Catholic man or woman. Without question Buchanan is brilliant and well-researched. The bad news is that he is only willing to push the envelop so far against conventional wisdom offered by mainstream media. His works still edit out considerable direct criticism of Jews and identification of their central role in many historical events. His policy of incrementalism and cautious and carefully measured approaches towards dispensing "truth" to the public is a trade off. On the one hand, by diluting his message, he can get important messages past Jewish gatekeepers to broad audiences. By acting as a "kosher conservative," he hopes to sustain some form of "conservatism" through thick and thin in hopes of never making Jewish media moguls and other plutocrats mad enough to want to destroy everything. On the other hand, by not telling the full story, people may wake up too late to be able to effectively face various grave dangers. In addition, Buchanan only tends to go on "limited offensives" once he is convinced the public mood has changed to the point that it is relatively safe. The big problem with the appeasement and incremental approach is that once Jews get completely out of control, as they did with Russians following the Bolshevik Revolution, or with Palestinians upon creation of Israel, they themselves practice daring (as in "chutzpah") forms of "total war" (as in "cultural Marxism," "affirmative action" forms of slow anti-white marginalization and genocide, and other approaches). In the "Info War," it takes at least a "manuever warfare" tactician to decisively defeat the "Mongols of covert 4th generation warfare." (Please go to Chapter 38 where I discuss "Principles of Info War," and search the web page for the key word "Mongols.") Using William S. Lind's four generations of warfare paradigm as an analogy, Buchanan's mentality is heavily "Second Generation." Using a World War II analogy, he reminds me of British Gen. Bernard Montgomery who only tended to advance in limited offensives once he had a clear 2:1 or 3:1 superiority in man power and fire power (combat power) in set-piece battles compared to someone like a Gen. Douglas MacArthur, Gen George S. Patton, Gen Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, or Generaloberst Heinz Guderian who were much more mentally geared towards audiciously and opportunistically striking their enemies on the flanks or in deep envelopments to the rear in fluid situations. So far Buchanan has given no inkling that Jews are an in-bred race with a high percentage of psychopathic people for whom there isabsolutely no limit to how much evil they commit or the depths of ugliness they will sink to until someone finally brings them in check. For more insights, please see "Pat Buchanan's Double Mind," by Kevin Alfred Strom, 28 Aug 2009. Links: columns archived at townhall.com, and also at his home site The American Cause.

Contrary to the image created by this Time cover, Buchanan has been mostly a "kosher conservative" for the establishment

 

Dr. Ralph Raico is a professor of European history who has specialized in "the history of liberty, the liberal tradition in Europe, and the relationship between war and the rise of the state." He does an excellent job of making an analogy between the benefits of political decentralization following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, and the virtues of business decentralization that result in smaller and more entrepreneurial companies. In other words, breaking apart empires has analogous advantages on a political level to breaking apart conglomerates on a business level, as explained by Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman in their classic work In Search of Excellence : Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. With more states competing against each other in the Middle Ages, rulers were under more pressure to avoid overtaxing their most productive subjects for fear of losing them to competition. This encouraged lower taxation and more personal liberty compared to an imperial system. This is certainly a potent argument for secessionism and the creation and maintenance of small states as opposed to empires. As an interesting aside that comments on this issue, I recollect a guest from Gun Owners of America on the Alex Jones show who conducted a study which demonstrated an amazing direct correlation between repressive gun ownership laws and high taxation in America. The states and cities that do the most to ban private gun ownership -- a reflection of the most basic right of personal self defense-- also have the highest taxes, and vice versa. In the final analysis, personal liberty involves the result of a tug of war between predators and counter predators, that is, between individuals vs. the state, between states vs. the central government, and between states and competing states. An important reason for the steadily growing police state control grid in America today is raw Federal monopoly power over all the states, as well as too much apathy among the general public in standing up for its rights. Raico also does a great job of explaining the full nature of 19th century classical liberalism, and how the Industrial Revolution created greater relative material progress compared to most other periods of history, despite distorted and often politically-motivated charges about "Dark Satanic Mills" and "worker exploitation" made by slave-owning, land-rich Tories (later reinforced by Marxists) against entrepreneurial Whigs in England, their political competition. Although he does not explicitly discuss race and ethnicity, he does not explicitly contradict the role of these things either. For starters, he has observed that an important social basis of the American Revolution was the fact that there was relatively little immigration between 1700 and 1775, and America's tripled population came mostly from natural increase. Americans had a sense of rootedness within each colony. They also had extended kindred ties and retained Old World cultural values. All of this gave them the social organization, cohesion, discipline, and sense of purpose necessary on a grass roots level to successfully combat tyranny. Nor does Raico explicitly discuss the Jewish phenomenon as a possible "sociobiological disease" of 19th century classical liberalism and "empires." In other words, this was the century in which dynamic European societies became so liberal for entrepreneurs that they suffered reduced resistance to dynamic alien intruders. Worse yet, once nations turn into multi-ethnic or multi-racial empires, ruling elites become much more reliant on intrigue and intimidation to hold their power bases together, which in turn makes it much easier for Jews to parlay their own peculiar strengths in these areas to rise to the top. In addition, empires tend to form vast multi-ethnic urban power centers in places like Rome, London, Paris, Moscow, or New York, which also throws the Jewish "briar rabbit" into the urban "briar patch," because Jews have always been the most urban of all peoples and hence power competition in big cities is always "home turf." In his historical lectures, Raico explains how Germany and France were divided up into scores of semi-autonomous provinces throughout most of the 18th century, and how all of this rapidly changed into the 19th century. Jews exploited classical liberalism utilized by de facto imperial social orders to not only infiltrate the highest levels of power in the 19th century, but also to quietly build up spectacular financial power bases and networks, as Michael Collins Piper documents in The New Babylon. The 20th century became the era when Jews called in their chips accumulated in the prior century, stopping at nothing to ruthlessly exploit their financial power bases, and where their worst Forbidden Planet-type "id monster" nightmares such as the Soviet state floating in blood became reality for much of humanity. (See "Parting Thoughts: The Eternal Conflict" by George Kadar, where he notes: "...The 20th century in the Western world can be rightfully called the "Century of the Neanderthal..."). Unfortunately, as America heads deeper into the police state control grid, this savage plot is still thickening, with an all too familiar cast of characters still remaining in the background. Mises Institute articles archive Mises Institute MP3 archive: Lewrockwell.com articles archive

Dr. Ralph Raico

 

Thomas DiLorenzo is the author of The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War (also two follow-on books about Lincoln, such as: Lincoln Unmasked and Abraham Lincoln: Friend of Foe of Freedom), Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution--and What It Means for Americans Today, and How Capitalism Saved America: The Untold History of Our Country, from the Pilgrims to the Present. I view Thomas DiLorenzo's major contribution as his ability to popularize longstanding criticisms of modern liberal icons in a way that is still palatable to today's teeming masses of P.C.-brainwashed Yuppies. Needless to say, DiLorenzo goes nowhere near direct criticism of Jews or explicit discussion of racial and ethnic issues. However, he helps demolish historical icons that neo-Jacobin "Big Brother" uses to "control the past in order to control the future." Abe Lincoln and Alexander Hamilton are two major historical icons that provide ghostly support for unlimited federal government and an unlimited private central bank. Dr. DiLorenzo is a major contributor to the King Lincoln archive at lewrockwell.com which serves as an important Ghost-buster on Lincoln-related issues. It is not that DiLorenzo is saying anything that is particularly new, it is just that his sources have been gathering dust on library shelves and ignored by controlled media for too long. For example, his thesis about Lincoln is consistent with Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln by Sam Dickson or The American Lenin by L. Neil Smith published decades earlier. One of best explanations of the Confederate cause I have ever seen, echoed by Dr. DiLorenzo in his lectures, are contained in the first chapters of Memoirs of Service Afloat, During the War Between the States originally published in 1868 by Admiral Raphael Semmes, a lawyer who later became commander of the C.S.S. Alabama, one of the greatest raiders in naval history. In my "centralization vs. decentralization" article, I draw heavily upon Dr. DiLorenzo's analysis to describe how limited republics can morph into "ponzi government" by initially following the "Whig agenda" and Henry Clay's "American System" that DiLorenzo describes for Abraham Lincoln's policies which favored public works, a central bank, high tariffs, and other forms of "special privilege." From here, things can go from bad to worse to where we finally wind up with "evil government." This stops at absolutely nothing to keep itself in power, to include false flag attacks, distractive foreign wars, confiscatory taxation, fascistic banking-government cartels, the police state, and even genocide of the very core population it was originally designed to protect. Does any of this sound disturbingly familiar? Unfortunately DiLorenzo typically uses the word "nationalism" with a negative spin in his lectures. He usually conflates "nationalism" with high tariffs and other features of Henry Clay's "American System" which enhanced the power of the federal government and awarded disproportionate pork and special privilege to Northerners. In actuality, there exist alternative forms of American nationalism, such as "States Rights nationalism" that seeks to enhance state sovereignty in the face of federal power, "ethnic grass roots nationalism," which seeks to enhance the self-sufficiency and self-determination of ethnic groups at the grass roots as an alternative to government control, "racial libertarian nationalism," which uses protectionist measures to maintain racial and ethnic balance and control within a country without supporting empire, and generalized "libertarian nationalism," which imposes only low to moderate tariffs as a least bad form of taxation, while enjoying national unity provided by some form of minimum national government. Libertarian nationalism was the core political philosophy advocated by many leading Southerners such as Thomas Jefferson and John C. Calhoun. The Lincoln brand of highly centralized federal nationalism sought to jump tariffs from 15% (average in 1857) to over 47%. Given the nature of trade retaliation, exporters usually wound up paying the same tariff levels as importers. This wound up hitting Southern cotton exporters especially hard. With only one third of the national population, Southerners wound up paying over three quarters of all federal tax revenues, most of which was spent in the North. Meanwhile, northern manufacturers fattened up, since the high tariffs shut out much of their European competition. DiLorenzo notes "Southerners clearly understood that they were being made into tax slaves by the North, and by Lincoln, who announced in a February 15 1861 speech in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, that `The tariff is to the government what a meal is to the family.'" DiLorenzo is such a hardcore anarcho-libertarian that he has pushed free trade ideology to the maximum in his lectures beyond even moderate tariffs, as if he is oblivious to the way pure free trade policies can open up a society to infiltration by Jewish mafias at the highest levels and proletarian displacement at the lower levels by complete aliens. Pure free trade policies can also seriously undermine the ability of the native population to continually reinvest in strategic industries while retaining firm control of the strategic bases of society, to include major media and major money center banks. Besides, in the real world almost nobody ever practices what they preach about free trade for a variety of other reasons, to include the "sociobiological virtue" that charity must begin at home for any people to survive and prosper in a competitive world. There are many forms of tangible as well as intangible "social reinvestment" that has to be continually maintained, to including rewarding people involved in "idealistic service professions" such as police, school teachers, and military reserves, in order for a society to successfully perpetuate itself. Even on a racial level, whites have to continually reinvest in fellow whites on all levels in order for them to survive as a people. The business that does not continually reinvest in itself as a first priority eventually goes bankrupt, pure and simple. The same principle applies on a "sociobiological" and "ethnic-genetic" level among competing "Evolutionary Breeding Units" (or "tribes"), as explained in greater detail by the late British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith in his landmark work A New Theory of Evolution. He even explains the paradox that EBU's have to be selfish about inbreeding altruistic (or "selfless") genes in order for such selfless traits to survive. All of this leads to what I call the "libertarian paradox." Anarcho-libertarianism is all about a firm belief in the ability of human reason to triumph in all matters. This in turn implies faith that rational, scientific procedures can be consistently applied throughout society. Therefore, if one is scientific and truthful, one should be able to find sympathetic friends everywhere. People should respect honest differences of opinion on pressing social issues so long as one can demonstrate that one is honest and well-intentioned. People should bend over backwards to not discriminate even when one comes up with ideas that may startle or even shock them --so long as one is playing by ethical libertarian rules. And now for the real world. The paradox is that if one offers scientific evidence regarding innate racial and ethnic differences (see for example my discussion of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my "mutualism vs. parasitism" article, or my discussion of innate racial differences in my "environmental vs. genetics" article), it is amazing how many leading anarcho-libertarians who publicly pride themselves on their "truthfulness" will suddenly run off and hide somewhere. They may even avoid transacting on a business level. They are only willing to go so far in standing up to the forces of "political correctness." Well, dear reader, isn't this the equivalent on a personal level to what nations practice on a broader geopolitical level when they engage in boycotts, blockades, and protectionism? Nationalism is essentially a form of "organizing" to protect group political, economic, and other interests. Any anarcho-libertarian lecturers at the Mises Institute who might refuse to join me in an open public discussion of Jewish Neanderthalism, Holocaustianity, or Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology are in effect practicing a negative and perverse form of "nationalism" on the personal level by boycotting a truthful and open intellectual discussion. How dare any of them criticize me for taking a nationalist position on macro-economic trade issues when they are in effect practicing a form of "nationalism" -- albeit an ideological and very negative "political correctness" form of nationalism that I personally find very distasteful -- on the street level? The reality is that people practice both positive and negative forms of "nationalism" every day in their personal business and social affairs, so why should we be surprised if these things are also practiced routinely on a national economic level? "Nationalism" is too deeply rooted in human nature to ever be successfully altered on a sustainable basis by anarcho-libertarian free trade ideology. Man is by nature a tribal animal and nothing will ever change this underlying reality. Mises Institute articles archive Mises Institute MP3 archive Lewrockwell.com articles archive:

Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo

 

Dr. Hans Hermann Hoppe has offered some fresh perspectives that challenge us to examine actual functions performed by government agencies, and then ask hard questions about how the private sector can possibly perform them better. Among other things, Hoppe examines the role of private incentives and a sense of long term stakeholdership to motivate optimal stewardship of operations and resources. As two examples, his The Myth of National Defense Hoppe asks why insurance companies and private contractor groups cannot perform various "security" functions better than government agencies. In his lectures, Hoppe explains how monarchy can serve as a form of "privately owned government" where rulers have a long term incentive to reinvest in their fiefdoms, whereas "social democracy," in which politicians have no ownership, but instead often focus heavily on manipulating public appearances to get re-elected, often engage in wasteful pork spending to make a name for themselves without concern for the way running up public debt creates a bigger burden on others. The good news about Hoppe is that is always beneficial to try to look under the hood and perform a functional analysis. After all, government agencies that are left unchecked --or even worse yet may be in bed with national media (please recollect how "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." --William Colby, former CIA Director, quoted by Dave Mcgowan, Derailing Democracy, and "You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month." --CIA operative, discussing the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories. Katherine the Great, by Deborah Davis) -- may wind up growing like cancers. They may wind up performing the exact opposite functions for which they were originally intended. For example, a government that is supposed to protect the rights and interests of the overwhelming majority of its electorate who are white citizens may morph into a monster that serves Israeli/Jewish interests first and makes war on whites through forced-race mixing programs, false flag attacks, onerous taxation, and the installation of the police state control grid. A military establishment that is supposed to protect a country may instead create "fake Bin Ladens" to help justify its bloated existence and find new excuses to feed the military industrial complex. The bad news is that Hoppe is so "anarcho" that he, like DiLorenzo and most other Mises Institute folks, are generally unwilling to explicitly incorporate innate Jewish criminal Neanderthalism or the innate authoritarian passivity of certain white ethnic groups into their analysis. For example, the word "private contractor" started to carry a new distaste for many residents of New Orleans after they saw Israeli "private contractors" confiscate firearms from private citizens during Katrina. Many American servicemen have been disgusted with observing how "private contractors" are used abroad to skirt laws that ordinarily apply to servicemen, to include the torture of Iraqi children. Often it is more the men who make the system than the system that makes the men. Also, there are important reasons why many citizen armies have often historically been more effective than mercenary armies. One of the best forms of long term caretakership involves a sense of ownership of ones own ethnicity, race, or culture --which Hoppe does not openly address. Sometimes government organizations are the least bad alternative to maintain citizen control and fend off predatory Jewish mafias than evil "private" entities, somewhat analogous to the "poison pill defense" that many boards of directors of public corporations prepare to deter hostile hostile mergers and acquisitions. This is one reason why many countries insist on retaining 50% government ownership of mining and other natural resources-related enterprises whenever outsiders are involved. Sometimes "privatization" is used as a smokescreen for covert Zionist aggression; see for example my series about how Iceland got "ENRONed" about the nefarious operations of George Soros, the City of London, the Russian Jewish mafia, and other aliens. Therefore, while I think Hoppe has important insights and asks important questions, I would not take him as the "last word" on national defense or other government-related issues, but rather as just a "starting point" regarding "hypotheses" we need to entertain once we engage in deeper analytical thinking. Mises Institute articles archive. Mises Institute Hoppe MP3 archive Lewrockwell.com author archive.

Dr. Hans Hermann-Hoppe

 

Dr. Thomas Woods has done terrific work shattering many modern liberal historical icons just like Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo, particularly in regard to examining the history of colonial America, the role of the anti-Federalists, and the degradation of the U.S. Constitution over time. He is the author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History. Woods assisted Dr. Kevin R. C. Gutzman in The Politically Incorrect Guide(tm) to the Constitution, and co-authored with Gutzman Who Killed the Constitution?: The Federal Government vs. American Liberty from World War I to Barack Obama. I think these books are real home runs. According to Woods, twice during the colonial era, the colonies resisted creating a central government for North America. Up until the French and Indian War, the British government was typically "out of sight, out of mind," and each colony often conducted its own affairs like a fully sovereign country, to include issuing its own money, regulating its own economy, selecting its own government leaders, raising its own armed forces, protecting its own borders, and deciding against whom to make war. Significantly, in the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783 which officially ended the American War of Independence, the King of England recognized each former colony as a separate sovereign state. This is a very profound insight. Americans need to stand back and really let it sink in. For starters, it shatters the "Founding Fathers" cult and the "Federal Government as God" religion, where Americans somehow feel like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson came down from the clouds and gave Americans their rights under the Constitution like Moses coming down from Mt. Sinai with the Ten Commandments tablets. If anything, the "Founding Fathers" were really the "Following Fathers." The states had already proven themselves completely competent at running themselves before even the Articles of Confederation were created, not to mention the U.S. Constitution. They had already developed their own viable constitutions and parliamentary procedures. In fact, in the End of Kings William Everdell observes that America had some of its most honest, effective, and efficient government during the colonial era. In addition, America had eight Presidents of the United States in Congress Assembled under the Articles of Confederation beginning with John Hanson, so why is it that in our federalized school system usually gives children the impression that America was "leaderless" prior to the Washington presidency? Lastly, neither the Constitution nor Bill of Rights gave Americans any rights, but rather described the limited powers the people's representatives gave to government to help protect the rights that they already had. On top of this, America's overwhelmingly WASP (highly Nordic-Celtic) population had very strong libertarian instinctive feelings --embodied in the naturally-evolved English Common Law-- to back up what George W. Bush would later call "Just a G-D piece of paper" -- the kinds of feelings that have been steadily lost in the population at large as America has steadily diluted its former WASP majority with descendants of Neanderthals, Aztec cannibals, and other featherless bipeds from around the world. One can make a very strong argument that if anything, the states had already given up too many sovereignty rights under the Articles of Confederation in order to give the appearance of a "united front" to attract aid from France during the American Revolution. Then things went from bad to worse when many of them agreed to even greater federal centralization created by the U.S. Constitution. As Gary North observes in "Conspiracy in Philadelphia," the motives of the framers of the Constitution --who actually usurped the Articles of Confederation-- were not totally pure. The Philadelphia convention was held in secret under the guise of recommending amendments to the Articles of Confederation rather than replacing the entire document. The Constitution also bailed out bankers who had lent money to individual states during the Revolution by making the Federal government responsible for repayment. American citizens had no moral duty to bail out these lenders who had understood the risks involved when they originated their loans with individual states. I do not have the space here to go into all the main points made by Gary North or Dr. Thomas Woods here --which are all well worth your time -- but instead would like to illustrate how they they have stimulated me to do my own historical research to uncover the real motivations behind many leading Federalists. George Washington is a prime example. I discovered that he was a major western land speculator who wanted to rapidly develop his properties with a Federal army. He claimed thousands of acres near the Battle of the Great Kanawha in 1774 (also called the Battle of Point Pleasant) on the West Virginia-Ohio border that Teddy Roosevelt claims in The Winning of the West helped start the American Revolution. The militia who fought this battle brazenly defied the the British government's prohibition against expansion across the Appalachian continental divide. They showed other colonists how they could go man to man against Indians deep inside the frontier and defeat the main Indian force defending the Ohio Valley --without any help from British soldiers. Roosevelt claims this victory really pumped up colonists psychologically for Lexington and Concord. An important selling point in Common Sense by Tom Paine was the idea that if Americans could win their independence, they would have the wealth of an entire continent at their disposal and no longer be hemmed in by the Appalachians. The U. S. Government was born as a speculative real estate venture partner as well as a limited republic ostensibly designed to protect rights. Washington also owned thousands more acres along the main overland transportation corridor into the Ohio Valley than ran next to where he was defeated at Ft. Necessity at the inception of the French and Indian War. One of his first orders of business as President was to send federal armies into the Ohio valley to complete the conquest from the Indians. George Washington also saw some nice personal property appreciation when he played a key role in relocating the Federal capitol near his Mount Vernon estate. Alexander Hamilton (probably a Rothschild agent), who was Washington's right hand man, wanted to install an American version of the British mercantilist system that favored big bankers over the people. He also wanted to create a central bank that could be a valuable tool for funding federal military operations. Quite a few contemporaries of Washington had a totally different view of the man than what is commonly promoted today by our federalized education system, a prime example being Benjamin Franklin Bache, editor of the populist paper The Philadelphia Aurora and grandson of Benjamin Franklin, who bitterly compared George Washington to Oliver Cromwell. I lean in Bache's direction and now view George Washington as a kind of "Cromwell lite." The analogy is not perfect by any means, because among other things Cromwell was a Puritan, whereas Washington was a Deist heavily influenced by the Enlightenment. In addition, many historians agree that Washington had many noble character traits that do not necessarily coincide with Cromwell's personality. However, there are still some interesting historical "rhymes" and "echoes." Washington figured out a way to score eight years as a "U.S. President" rather than serve as as Cromwell's version of a "Lord Protector." Still, this beat the term of roughly one year each served by Presidents of the United States in Congress Assembled under the Articles of Confederation. Like Cromwell, Washington loved to lead armies. In fact, he raised raised a bigger army than the one he had used to win at Yorktown in an effort to pacify western Pennsylvania whiskey farmers, and became the only acting U.S. President to lead an army himself. Washington also worked with apparent Jewish agents. Cromwell let the Jews back into England after they had been banned for centuries, and not only borrowed money from them, but joined with them in foreign plantation ventures. Washington was cozy not only with the likely Rothschild agent Alexander Hamilton, but was also a Mason. The Masons in America probably functioned as a front organization for Jewish plutocrats in Britain much like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission, Rhodes Scholars, Bilderberg Group, and other elite groups that came later. See Chapter 5 for more on these subversive groups, to include the "ring within a ring" strategy for covert conquest explained by G. Edward Griffin and Professor Carol Quigley. The installation of the U.S. Constitution over the Articles of Confederation primed America for a fast-growth strategy to rapidly develop western lands under federal direction and a federal army. Previously, each colony or state was responsible for expansion to its immediate west. It also set up America to get its first privately owned central bank, a very bad precedent that was finally ended in the 19th century by President Andrew Jackson. For more background on America's tragic historical experience with privately owned central banks, please visit Chapter 33: Wall Street Coup de Etat and Banker False Flags Against America and watch The Money Masters video. America grew so fast that the country became overwhelmed by alien peoples, totally destroying the common social fabric described in Albion's Seed by David Hackett Fisher that had helped give rise to the American Revolution in the first place. After whites rapidly conquered Indians, Zionists came in from behind and rapidly conquered fragmented whites. Using the liberal minority coalition political tactics described by Wilmot Robertson in The Dispossessed Majority, many Jewish leaders along with certain Catholic allies like Senator Teddy Kennedy proceeded to open up the floodgates of nonwhite immigration in the 1960's, thereby reducing whites from 90% of the population down to less than 70% today. Admirers of George Washington point out that to put rapid westward expansion policies in perspective, one needs to keep in mind that Thomas Jefferson, one of America's leading anti-Federalists, played loose with the Constitution to take advantage of the Louisiana Purchase. That was every bit as aggressive as Washington's fixation on conquering the Ohio and Indiana Territories with a federal army, funded by a central bank. To a large extent, these leaders were following public sentiment as much as leading it. Many Americans believed that rapid growth was necessary to preempt territorial claims on the West by the empires of Spain, Britain, Mexico, France, and Russia. Tragically, this rapid growth strategy came at a terrible price. It gave the Federal government an excuse to maintain a large standing army that it would later use to ruthlessly crush Southern states during the War of Northern Aggression (1861-1865). It also conditioned new immigrants to look to the federal government as their ultimate benefactor to acquire land rather than a state government, creating another nail in the coffin of States' Rights and opening another door towards unlimited federal growth. One might say that rapid western growth through federal government direction comprised its flanking maneuver against the "true federalism" doctrine intended by most states for the original U.S. Constitution, where the federal government was supposed to always be kept weaker than the state governments. Like so many anarcho-libertarians, Woods does not directly address racial and ethnic issues, so let me connect some dots here with my own views while I am on this topic: America went from a provincial social model during the colonial period to a fast growth Roman imperial model masquerading as a "limited republic" beginning with the George Washington presidency. This "limited-republic-at risk" finally let the mask of the Big Government cunning predator completely slip away during Abe Lincoln's War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence, which totally destroyed all viable remnants of the "limited republic" of the so-called "Founding Fathers," and installed in its place a Neo-Jacobin version of Napoleonic France in North America. Then along came the Rothschilds and millions of other Jews, and under their "wise and noble tutelage" in the 20th century, America morphed into New Babylon and a nonfiction version of the Galactic Empire of the Sith. . (See High Priests of War, The New Jerusalem, The New Babylon by Michael Collins Piper and the "snake book series" by Col Donn de Grand Pre). Once one understands the general trend of America's sociological changes, Dr. Wood's books in cooperation with Dr. Kevin Gutzman about the U.S. Constitution become much more comprehensible. In a radio interview, Dr. Gutzman observed that in the 20th century, the federal government simply ignored the Constitution most of the time. Dr. Gutzman's books with Dr. Woods show us the steady process of erosion in the fundamental support structures of the Constitution that began soon after the document was created, and only accelerated into the 19th and then 20th centuries. Things really hit a new low in the 20th century when the Jewish Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis justified decisions based on "sociological theories" that he simply pulled out of his hip pocket, which had absolutely nothing to do with the original Constitution. There is also an interesting paradox at play here where both modern liberals (environmental top-down "Neo-Jacobins" in my chart above) and old fashioned paleoconservatives ("genetic bottom up") can become disdainful of too much emphasis on "Constitutionalism" --but for opposite ideological reasons. Neo-Jacobins view the Constitution as a creature of ideology, which is reinvented to change with the times and new ruling elites. They also believe that one needs a strong state to enforce ideology and hold America together. Therefore, we saw President George W. Bush calling the Constitution just a "G-D piece of paper" when it got in the way of his latest Zionist neocon ideological revelations and Big Government power needs. In contrast, paleoconservatives point out that a number of European countries like Iceland, England, and Switzerland have operated stable, successful parliamentary governments respectful of individual rights for extended periods in their history without any written Constitution at all. An important reason is that they have maintained a stable, homogeneous white ethnic population in which parliamentary traditions and human rights are firmly embedded in their folk traditions. From this viewpoint, a sudden emphasis on "constitutionalism" can be a negative indicator that greedy businessmen now want to import alien peoples as cheap labor, and claim that they can indoctrinate aliens in enough "constitutional law" to make them "just as good" as longstanding citizens (This did not seem to work too well with America's first suspected "illegal alien president" Barack Hussein Obama II, aka Barry Soetero, who is a former "professor" of constitutional law). In actuality, when one starts filling up the country with too many different peoples with innately different value systems, it loses the critical mass of deeply felt core sentiment required to preserve the true spirit of any original constitution. Instead, everything becomes all form and no substance, where people focus on legalities rather than real justice. As the Roman writer Tacitus once observed, "When the state is most corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied." He said this long after the once fairly homogeneous Roman Republic had dissolved into a highly corrupt and centralized multi-racial empire. An excessive dependency on "Constitutionalism" can become symptomatic of "multiplying law, " and hence a negative when it causes people to lose sight of the fact that in the long run, blood is thicker than anything else. Speaking of blood and liberty, I have some very serious disagreements with Dr. Wood's book How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. Not surprisingly, Dr. Woods is a convert to Roman Catholicism. I provide links to many sources that directly contradict underlying premises of this work in my Religious Archive web page. A good starting point is the The Age of Reason by Tom Paine and the work Which Way Western Man? by William Gayley Simpson (see archive page), which debunk Christianity itself. Regarding the Catholic Church, consider A Lamp in the Dark: The Untold History of the Bible, or the works of Sir Edward Gibbon, author of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, who believed that the Catholic Church was more of an expression of Roman decadence than its solution. William Simpson explained how Christianity has many leftist-universalistic philosophical characteristics in common with communism. He also explained how Christianity was invented by Jews and has many very unattractive Jewish characteristics embedded within it. Even Dr. Murray Rothbard admitted that the Protestant Reformation was about political and religious decentralization, to include the right for each individual to read the Bible and interpret it on his own, as well as politically break away from Vatican dictatorship, all of which is the opposite direction from where the Catholic Church was headed. Not surprisingly, the Protestant Reformation predominated in majority Nordic countries, where a certain streak of libertarianism seems to be embedded in the DNA. Perhaps the increased intellectual and economic output in Protestant countries that coincided with throwing off the Catholic yoke provides a better perspective for evaluating the Catholic contribution to "Western Civilization." I am sure that one can find considerable good done by the Catholic Church in certain places, but then again, once a parasite takes over its host, it has to stop hurting it and actually start helping it at some point in order for both to survive. At some point, the Catholic Church focused less energy on rooting out and torturing heretics, and brainwashing people with Jewish-created dogmas. The Catholic Church actually started to do some good things for people. Similarly, Soviet Russia at one point started to focus less time on mass murder and running the GULAG, and instead started to do things which would help to rebuild Russia. Maybe this is an area where I can find some common ground with Dr. Woods on the Catholic Church issue. This leads to another important point, namely that Jews have used their alliance with Catholics in America to outflank and dispossess WASP's in a similar manner to the way the Federal government was able to use its large professional standing army used to conquer the West to outflank States' rights. I discuss all this in greater detail in my "Handling Real Nazis' section in Chapter 34 of my Trilogy titled "Saving Dr. Toben, Handling Real Nazis, and Countering the Holocaustianity Intellectual Blackjack." Hardly willing to benefit from constructive criticism by Protestants, there have been certain Popes who have unleashed covert private armies of Jesuits and other professional subversives under oath to reverse both republican government and the Protestant Reformation in Protestant countries. Today, Catholics are as numerous as Protestants in America --and should we be surprised that this Jewish-Catholic takeover seems to be leading America towards the perfect police state? (Janet Napolitano, the Catholic-Jewish head of the Department of Homeland Security -- America's answer to Soviet KGB and Nazi Gestapo -- serves as a poster girl in this regard). As previously mentioned on this web page, Catholics typically swing back and forth politically between WASPs and Jews like the way mestizos swing between whites and Indians in Latin American politics, and as I document in Chapter 29 of my Trilogy from research by Michael Collins Piper's and Brother Nathanael Kapner, there is strong evidence that there have been times when the Vatican has been run outright by Jewish infiltrators. Among other things, the Vatican has a long history of relying on the Rothschilds to manage its finances. The fact that Catholic scholars on the Mises Institute staff almost never directly criticize Jews or Zionists, yet accept funding contributions from them, while advocating libertarian ideals originated by WASP's, helps to to support these assertions. Of course I do not mean imply that Dr. Woods himself is necessarily some kind of "useful idiot" in a Jesuit conspiracy. (Capt Eric May, who I cover in my Trilogy, thinks many Catholics have mellowed out over time, which is why he humored his wife by letting himself get baptized by them in Chapter 13). In fact, there is at least one area of common philosophical ground that Dr. Woods appears to share with both myself and a paleoconservative nationalist like Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson who is a priest in the Ukrainian Orthodox church (profiled in the nationalist section further down this web page). According to Wikipedia: "As a traditional Catholic, [Dr. Woods] advocates the Extraordinary Form of the Mass and cultural conservatism." The idea is that in order to be a really hardcore conservative (or even "nationalist"), one needs to find "indigenous" forms of religion that have passed the test of time over many centuries within a stabilized population that reflect the evolution of "natural" values. In fact, in this area I am not only on the same page as Dr. Woods and Dr. Johnson, but am even further to the right. I support the modern revitalization of the Old Norse religion, as discussed in Part I of my Iceland series. However, I cannot push this area of common ground too far either, after all, there were some definite areas of "friction" in the "values department" between Norsemen and Catholics in places like the shorelines of France, England, and Ireland during the Viking Age, or between Eastern Orthodox Christians and Roman Catholics when the great Russian hero Alexander Nevsky won his victory against the Catholic Teutonic Knights in the Battle of the Ice on 5 April 1242. Nevsky apparently considered even Mongols a lessor evil compared to Catholics. Wikipedia notes: "Historians seem to be unsure about Alexander’s behavior when it came to his relations with Mongols. He may have thought that Catholicism presented a more tangible threat to Russian national identity than paying a tribute to the Khan, who had little interest in Russian religion and culture." Despite my many reservations regarding Dr. Wood's interpretations of certain religious issues, I believe that his articles about American history and the Constitution are a "must read." Mises Institute articles archive Mises Institute MP3 archive Lew Rockwell articles archive.

Dr. Thomas Woods

 

Rev. Ted Pike is an important defender of free speech on the Religious Right. Our First Amendment rights are a prerequisite before any other rights become meaningful. As in the case of Dr. Thomas Woods, while I express disagreement with many of Rev. Pike's views on a theological level (as reflected on my Religious Crisis web page), this does not negate our pressing need to make common cause with all patriotic Americans regardless of their religious background against evil forces like the ADL that seek to destroy our free speech rights and turn America into a complete police state. This could result in what Alex Jones refers to as "global population reduction" genocide of major portions of this country. Don't laugh --it already happened in Bolshevik Russia. I agree with Alex Jones that most Americans have no concept regarding the level of evil we are up against. I list the articles of Rev Ted and his niece Harmony Grant Daws on a special Rev Ted Pike web page, which serves as a backup to the articles that Rev. Pike lists at his own web site truthtellers.org.

Rev. Ted Pike and his wife Alynn

 

Other libertarians: There are many dozens of other libertarian thinkers and media leaders who are worthy of mention. Please check out "The French Connection" at iamthewitness.com that gives Zionism a black eye while claiming "We are not racist, xenophobic, homophobic, or prejudiced against any race, creed, or national origin. We are prejudiced only against criminals." For those of you Yuppies out there who are too politically correct squeamish to squarely address racial and ethnic issues, maybe this is the only way I can inspire you to get your feet wet and wake up just a little bit. Please got to my Site Map section to find many of other important web sites listed under "Some important libertarian sites."

AMERICAN
NATIONALIST THINKERS
AND MEDIA LEADERS

One of the great tragedies of "American nationalism" is that it has always been something of a joke by traditional European standards. This is one reason why William Everdell remarked in The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans that the entire right hand side of the British political spectrum was completely missing in the colonies at the time of the American Revolution. Since 1861, the nicest thing one can say about American "conservatism" is that it has been able to fight some kind of delaying action against the never-ending, cancerous growths of out-of-control neo-Jacobin federal government and the myriad manifestations of Jewish Marxism and Zionism. There has been a longstanding joke on the American Right that what is "conservative" today is merely what was introduced as "radical left wing" only a few decades before. The late Harvard economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted in The Age of Uncertainty that many of his students were shocked when they first read the Communist Manifesto and see how many items on the plank have become a reality in America today. Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman commented in a late 1970's Forbes interview that virtually every item on the 1928 Socialist plank had already become a reality. Meanwhile, white American society only seems to become ever more fragmented over time. Not surprisingly, the overall society has became ever more multi-racial, multi-cultural, imperial, and plantation-like in its de facto social structure. There is no "indigenous identity" for whites, often the bedrock of other nationalist movements around the world. In the prevailing business culture, "success" for whites means the ability to make a quick buck while suppressing all feelings of natural tribal loyalty for fellow whites -- to in essence be as undiscriminating as a whore in a Nevada bordello --unless one happens to be Jewish, in which case it is totally acceptable to totally dominate the management of the Federal Reserve, Hollywood firms, small Brooklyn sweatshops -- whatever Jews want, Jews get -- as one of the most ferociously tribalistic peoples in world history. Today, America comprises a truly amazing sociological and ideological train wreck with unspeakably evil cabals redoubling their efforts to feed on its carcass by installing police state and martial law control grids. In my introduction to the Kevin Strom author archive, I explain how America today is ideologically redder than a lobster by traditional European standards. For example, most Americans would view Kevin Strom as "radical right wing." Politically correct Federal agents who tried to frame Strom while he was undergoing divorce proceedings with his second wife, Elisha Strom, probably wanted to leave the subliminal impression with the American public: "Bad luck on Strom for being so right wing, and bad luck on you if you read his stuff and take him seriously." Yet ironically, by many traditional European standards Strom actually did three very left wing things: a) He married outside his European country of ancestral origin b) he married outside his class (upper middle class professional) and c) he married outside his ethnicity. Speaking of European attitudes, in my section "Handling Real Nazis" of Chapter 34 of my Trilogy, I describe my encounter with a scholar while riding on a train in Britain, who said: "Well, I say [old chap], you Americans come from an interesting land where everything is new. You Americans have no history, you have no class, and you have no culture." I also referenced John de Nugent, a white civil rights activist, who claimed that while he lived in France, many French expressed the attitude that America is simply a land of overgrown adolescents. He quoted former French leader Clemenceau, who allegedly said "The US is the only society to have gone from barbarism to decadence without passing through civilization along the way." White Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASP's), who were once America's overwhelming majority, have been reduced to another minority about co-equal in size with Catholics, and both groups are dominated by Jews, and neither WASP's nor Catholics seem to care very much about the possibility of getting completely obliterated by the Death of the West trend identified in Pat Buchanan's book by this same name. On an ideological level, things only went from bad to worse in America when the floodgates of immigration were opened up to all European nationalities in the late 19th century in order to rapidly populate the remaining frontier, which also meant rapidly driving up real estate values and driving down real wages for the benefit of greedy land speculators and industrialists. Instead of "folk, faith, and the sacred motherland of ones ancestors," it became "money, money, money." It also became a land of "tinsel, neon, and honky tonks" instead of "high culture." In Appendix IV of my Iceland series which addresses American history from a nationalist perspective, I explain the highly dualistic nature of the original U.S. Constitution. On the one hand, it supported State's Rights where State Legislatures originally selected representatives to the U.S. Senate. On the other hand, it promoted federal centrism through direct election by the public to the U.S. House of Representatives. This is one example where Americans created a "have your cake and eat it too" society. In the 19th century, Americans wanted to have the libertarian ethos that typically accompanies a relatively small homogeneous Nordic or Nordic-Celtic society like Iceland, yet at the same time America operated as a de facto multi-layered and multi-ethnic and even multi-racial plantation society more reminiscent of ancient Babylon. Americans imported black slaves in the South and Irish and Italian Catholics as low cost industrial workers in the North. In the 20th century, the federal government maintained a de facto open borders policy with tidal waves of low cost, illegal alien immigrants from Mexico. In the 19th century America wanted to retain the "democratic feel" of New England town hall meetings, yet at the same ran a de facto imperial war machine that conquered the "inland empire" of the North American continent, only to later use it to smash the Old South and along with it any credible doctrine of States' Rights --which Thomas Jefferson stated in the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 was the only credible deterrent to unlimited federal growth and federal tyranny. In the 20th century this same imperial war machine morphed into a Zionist-friendly global cop that looks the other way whenever Israelis kill Americans (as noted again at the end of this piece) while Americans kill over a million Iraqis and Afghans for Israel and Rothschild-controlled big oil interests. This country has always been doing one thing on a sociological and business level, and then doing something totally the opposite on a superficial ideological or rhetorical level. This disparity became especially wide after 1861, as captured in Dr. Revilo Oliver's excellent article "The Beginning of the End," Liberty Bell, Aug 1988. Unfortunately the land of the "Wild West" went from having problems that were "fixable" to problems that have become completely out of control. Even today one can find many well-crafted "Victorian" and "American Gothic" old houses around the country, not to mention beautiful mansions in the South, that give the sense that Americans were trying to evolve their own "high culture" in the mid to late 1800's before something very dark started creeping into their land, only to drag down Americans and stab them in the heart, just like what happened to the Russian people. (See the last sentence of the article "Russia's Christian Martyrs" by Marina Marynova). After the Federal government became a foaming-at-the-mouth neo-Jacobin state following Abe Lincoln's War and the so-called "Reconstruction" era in the South, the Robber Barons who controlled the government from behind the scenes took the attitude that by pumping anarcho-libertarian ideology into the brains of "wretched refuse" imported as cheap labor from all over Europe, this could erase centuries old racial and ethnic conflicts. All this included millions of Jews like the Marxist-Zionist named Emma Lazarus, who explicitly called for importing "wretched refuse" in her poem "The New Colossus," a very much beloved sonnet by her kinfolk that is now inscribed on a crummy little iron plaque stuck on the base of a grand statue donated to America by the people of France. This statue was originally dedicated to the "Liberty" earned by hardy, intelligent, free, brave and self-sufficient people, not by "wretched refuse." Again, America's schizoid rhetorical and ideological disparities in "The Land of Contrasts" manifested itself once again. The quality and character of America's political institutions deteriorated a quantum level in the decades following the War Against Southern Independence, where the "politics of envy," "patronage payoffs," and "wealth redistribution" soon replaced the original republican politics of "wise policy formulation" and "rational process," all of which was in turn accompanied by the rise of extremely selfish and vulgar Marxist-socialist labor unions, Jewish mafia, and big city Catholic political machines. The principles of limited government so beautifully expressed in the famous Davy Crockett "Sockdolager!" story became "Gone With the Wind." In time, the majority WASP population that felt these values on an instinctive level also became history. To paraphrase 18th century French libertarian analysts (as noted by Dr. Ralph Raico cited below), the "political means" replaced "the productive means" and the "tax-eating classes" gained the upper hand over the "tax-producing classes." America became a giant "neo-Jacobin bloat bag" where the real objective of America's power elite was to "preserve the union" (code-speak for "stay in power at all costs," to include any tyrannical methods that can be smoothed over by "democratic" rhetoric) by figuring out ever more ingenious methods to deceive people while shifting their money about in whatever way was necessary to "preserve the system." The American state became, as Frederic Bastiat so famously put it, "the great fiction by which everybody tries to live at the expense of everybody else." The ultimate masters at this game on a global scale smelled blood like hungry fleas and quickly flooded into America. As mentioned, millions of Jews vectored in from Eastern Europe and elsewhere to pile into America's largest cities in the late 19th century. Having already become a major power in America behind the scenes in railroads and later oil in the mid to late 1800's, Rothschild confederates set up America's central bank in 1913 and grabbed control of major media. The Washington "District of Criminals" essentially became a glorified baby-sitting service where politicians espoused Jeffersonian rhetoric for public consumption on the one hand, while on the other hand behind the scenes aided and abetted ultra high-level deception and looting. This included shanghaiing America into unnecessary intervention into a European fratricidal war (see my discussion of the Balfour Declaration in my article "Thomas Jefferson and the `Incredible Truth' about Bush Cabal Wise Guys and False Flag Nukes") and financing the Bolshevik takeover of Russia (Please see in Chapter 33 the commentary related to the embedded video "The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America"). Tragically, America's emergent New Jerusalem and New Babylon leadership in the early 20th century could never control quite control it's insane greed and Neanderthal hatred towards America's once highly productive white majority. By the mid-1960's, this evil elite made no serious effort to arrest what became the beginning of a long decline in America's industrial base. At this same time, they also opened up the floodgates of Third World immigration and fast-forwarded the continued depletion of America's Nordic genetic stock on a sociobiological level. The failure to arrest the industrial decline and the race war against WASP's fit hand in glove with each other, because only WASP's and perhaps a few other frost-zone sculptured gene pools have demonstrated a long term capacity to innovate, delay gratification, follow rational processes, and implement other measures necessary to build a productive industrial base at a faster rate than resources are consumed by overall population. The poisonous attitudes of the alien power elite are manifested in myriad other ways, not only through the "mainstreaming" of hard-core pornography beginning in the 1970's to destroy family values, but also through the introduction of toxic additives in "GMO'ed" foods, vaccines, and public drinking water --not to mention the atmosphere itself. (Listen to Alex Jones on GCN and John Stadtmiller at RBN and their expert guests for more details). Eventually, states like Minnesota would report childhood autism rates at 1 in 80 --which only decades earlier was extremely rare. In this and myriad other ways, the general American population was showing signs of getting ever sicker and sicker. Libertarian theory cannot explain any of this. In fact, it is so weird and evil that it usually blows libertarian minds. In contrast, most chapters on "parasitology" in sociobiology textbooks handle this topic quite nicely, and you can too once you accept the premise that man remains a part of nature instead of removed from nature. Please see my "mutualism vs. parasitism" online article for more background. As the beginning of the final "end game" approached by the 1990s, America's malevolent "New World Order" power elite resorted to the most vile subterfuges imaginable as distracters, such as false flag attacks at Oklahoma City in 1995, New York and Washington, D.C. on 9-11-2001, and London 7-7-2005. By 2005 they were going pedal to the metal to install the police state and martial law control grids. In 2008 they came perilously close to starting a global nuclear war in South Ossetia as a gambit to cover their tracks, and in 2009 they made a abortive run at global depopulation mass murder through a swine flu false flag pandemic. Nationalism is about maintaining control of ones own destiny and protecting vital cultural and ethnic-genetic interests. The Jewish people, who have been despised everywhere they have gone in the last three thousand years for being the most deceitful, criminal, hypocritical, and money-grubbing of all races, were able to not only find a "happy home" in America, but also hijack the country's government and media and impose their values everywhere. This does not say a whole lot about American core cultural values --or the quality and strength of "American nationalism." Instead of proving that "this time it is different," the "American experience" has really only proven that "the nature of the beast" remains the same on both sides of the Atlantic. In his 4 June 2010 article "This Says It All," Justin Raimondo describes how the U.S. Government was unwilling to issue even a peep of protest after Israelis boarded a "Peace flotilla" in international waters and murdered a U.S. citizen in cold blood, just like it refused to protest when Israel tried to wipe out the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 on the high seas and blame it on Egypt. Indeed, Justin Raimondo is right --"this says it all." Despite all this, there have been quite a few very astute American observers who have tried to educate the public regarding nationalist principles. While they have been unable so far to turn the tide in favor of genuine nationalism, it is fair to say that things would be immeasurably worse in America if there was no one providing alternative viewpoints or putting up any resistance at all. As Tom Chittum observes in Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America, just wait until the neo-Jacobin America empire finally comes apart at the seams. Genuine nationalism will some day return. It has to. After all the sugar candy dreams promoted by Zionists, leftists, and big government fanatics have finally evaporated, white nationalism will be the only proven thing left that people can hang on to that actually works. Just ask folks in the former Soviet Union and former Communist Yugoslavia how they finally had to circle the wagons to save themselves from total obliteration and ruin.

"We Are All Living In America" --Is this the real tune of "American" nationalism today or is it more accurate to view this as some kind of "Neanderthal Internationale"? (Please see the table of contents excerpt for the special "Revenge of the Neanderthal" Barnes Review issue below, as well as links in the Dr. William Pierce section to the article "Who Rules America? and the classic video "America is a Changing Country." Why do you think most anarcho-libertarians are too scared to touch these issues?)

 

Table of Contents The following are some sample articles that explain the Neanderthal background of Jews, and how these hominids have been involved in a de facto race war with Cro Magnon Man (most whites) for tens of thousands of years preceding the official creation of "Judaism" as religious camouflage for skullduggery. For a complete list of articles, please visit the Table of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue of The Barnes Review. REVENGE OF THE NEANDERTHAL by Willis A. Carto, "The truth about the Neanderthal is a historical web that is finally being untangled. . . ." ISRAELI SAYS: “WE WERE INVENTED” by Willis Carto, "An eminent Israeli historian says the perceived origin of the Jewish people is anything but true. . . ." ‘MY ANCESTORS WERE NEANDERTHALS’ by Willis Carto, " Jewish scholar Stan Gooch has written extensively on the Neanderthal origins of today’s people known as `the Jews.'” Russian Royal Family Murdered by Neanderthals: RUSSIA’S CHRISTIAN MARTYRS by Marina Marynova, "The royal family of Russia were perhaps the first most prominent victims of Jewish Bolshevism. Here’s the sad story of their brutal murders. . . " The Postwar Neanderthal Triumph: WHO REIGNS SUPREME? by Michael Collins Piper, "Have the heirs to the Neanderthal finally achieved global supremacy? . . ." PARTING THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George Kadar, "...The 20th century in the Western world can be rightfully called the `Century of the Neanderthal' and it is up to us to stop this process."   The section above is taken from an online Table of Contents for the May/June 2010 special issue of The Barnes Review. Please also see the section "The Revenge of the Neanderthal, Ethnic-Genetic Distance, and the Neanderthal-Troll Connection" from Appendix VI of my Iceland series for some important additional perspectives. When was the last time you ever saw an anarcho-libertarian address these anthropological issues point-blank?

 

It is probably fair to state that in terms of scope of audience, and volume of publishing, Willis Carto has done more "heavy lifting" for paleoconservatism than most other activists on the Right. He founded The Spotlight (1975-2001), which once achieved mass circulation in the hundreds of thousands during the Carter administration, an impressive achievement in the pre-Internet era at a time when anything to the right of Winnie the Pooh was typically in the cross-hairs of "mainstream" controlled media, FBI COINTELPRO, or well-funded Jewish attack groups like the ADL (see Rev. Ted Pike archive for more on this unregistered agent of Israel and Zionist plutocracy). Find a brief bio here. Carto founded The Barnes Review in 1994, which covers "history brought in accordance with the facts" and began publication of the weekly newspaper American Free Press to replace the Spotlight in 2001. Carto still hits home runs. For example, I include an online table of contents for the "Revenge of the Neanderthal" May/June 2010 Barnes Review in Appendix VI of my Iceland series. Michael Collins Piper has assembled An Appeal To Reason that contains a wealth of Willis Carto's writings. I have always viewed the circulation numbers for Carto's publications (Spotlight, American Free Press, and The Barnes Review) as litmus tests for the general competency level of the American public and its business elite to rule themselves. These publications were always early to report such outrages as the deliberate Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967, Mossad-CIA global drug dealing, and utterly criminal pork spending on Capitol Hill. At their peak, Carto's publications have only numbered tens or hundreds of thousands rather than millions in circulation. This indicates how "dumbed-down," "apathetic," "childish," "brainwashed," and generally lacking in "republican virtue" a large segment of the general public had become by the late 20th century. Despite all this, Carto has continued to fight the good fight, because as depressing as the lack of an effective public response has been, if people like Carto failed to man the barricades, things could always become immeasurably worse in America. In the Gulag Archipelago and Two Hundred Years Together, Alexandr Solzhenitsyn recollects how Jewish Bolsheviks mass-murdered 60 million Russians. American Free Press is home base to many outstanding journalists, such as Michael Collins Piper, John Tiffany, Pat Shannan, Jim Tucker, Mark Anderson, and Victor Thorn who do outstanding work in documenting the the New World Order, false flag attacks, the police state control grid, and other threats to American sovereignty. I think that history will remember Carto very well. Links: Americanfreepress.net and barnesreview.org.

Willis Carto at the American Free Press Town Hall Event 13 Feb 2010 for James Traficant

John Stadtmiller runs the Republic Broadcasting Network out of Austin, Texas whose slogan is "Because You Can Handle the Truth." RBN serves as slightly more paleoconservative electronic media counterpart to Alex Jones and GCN. Stadtmiller's network hosts include Michael Collins Piper (definitely more explicitly critical of Zionists than Alex Jones), Mark Anderson (a star journalist for American Free Press), Dr. Rebecca Carley (who interviewed this author about the swine flu epidemic on 5 Dec 2010), Wayne Madsen of waynemadsen-report.com (a former Naval intelligence officer whose work I refer to frequently in my Mission of Conscience series), Rick Adams, and other patriotic hosts. RBN currently charges only $1.33 to access its MP3 archives, which I think is well worth it. In fact, I will go a step further. Even Alex Jones admits that he cannot sit through a single mainstream media program these days and not feel like he is being subliminally programmed with a some kind of poisonous message that supports the New World Order. How many other networks out there have the "truth quotient" of RBN? How many other networks besides RBN are willing to see if you can "handle the truth?" Links: republicbroadcasting.org. This home page also provides an excellent source of breaking news article links.

John Stadtmiller

 

Michael Collins Piper has been a leading journalist in pro-American nationalist, populist alternative media for decades. That alone is an amazing achievement. His first edition of Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy came out in 1994, in the pre-Internet Dark Ages when such exposes could be especially dangerous for a journalist's health. Considering all the material witnesses to the JFK assassination who have met untimely deaths, not to mention American sailors who got murdered in broad daylight on the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 without hardly a peep of protest by the U.S. Government, it took guts to openly accuse the Mossad and its CIA-U.S. Government collaborators of orchestrating the murder of President John F. Kennedy. Piper's books do more than update us from where Henry Ford, Myron Fagan, Benjamin H. Freedman, and other whistle-blowers regarding out-of-control Zionist power left off. Zionism, a highly aggressive and criminal form of Jewish nationalism, exists in a predator vs. counter-predator relationship with any form of gentile nationalism. When Zionism gets stronger, gentile nationalism is always correspondingly weaker, and vice versa, just like rat and cat populations in ecology models. In this back-handed manner, Piper's books about Zionism instruct us more honestly than most other sources on the sorry state of any form of genuine American nationalism. America First Books is honored to carry many Piper books as ebooks. They include not only Final Judgment, but also The Judas Goats, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Best Witness, and Dirty Secrets. Piper's other books currently available in soft-cover include The GOLEM, My First One Hundred Days in the White House, Target Traficant, and The New Babylon. Links: Author archive page at americafirstbooks.com and mikepiperreport.com (also Michaelcollinspiper.com).

Mike Piper pictured with Greek nationalist and writer Peter Papaheraklis at the Traficant conference on 13 Feb 2010

 

Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson's work is a perfect example of what I mean by the "international nationalist" concept on the home page. One must necessarily be exposed to numerous "case studies" of different societies, cultures, and historical experiences in order to understand how all the different variables that affect successful social functioning come together, as well as acquire a fresh perspective on ones own society and how it fits it into a broader context. Dr. Johnson earned his Ph.D. in political science and is an expert on Eastern European history. Although of Irish and other northern European-related descent, he is a priest in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and the author of The Third Rome: Holy Russia, Tsarism and Orthodoxy. His articles at rusjournal.com and lectures on his Orthodox Nationalist radio show address the necessity for "spiritual" and "organic integrity" as well as "ideological integrity" for a society to function adequately. Significantly, Dr. Johnson claims that his political and religious views have evolved to the point that they are very similar to those expressed by the late Nobel Laureate Alexandr Solzhenitsyn. Please visit Chapter 32: "Neo-Con Bloodying of the Russian Bear, and Putin vs. the New World Order" of my Trilogy where I extensively quote from the work of Dr. Johnson. I explain ways in which Russia appears to provide some kind of bulwark of anti-New World Order and pro-nationalist sanity as the rest of the world patiently waits for America to transition out of its current phase of imperial lunatic decadence. If nothing else, Russia has punished certain criminal Zionist oligarchs, resisted Israeli demands, and has also refused to surrender its territory to invading Third World hordes. By American standards (or rather the lack of them) this is way off the New World Order path. I have found Dr. Johnson's lectures on medieval Slavic history and culture to be very valuable for many reasons. First, for paleoconservatives who believe that human societies reflect innate as well as learned traits, it is very helpful to observe their behavior over many hundreds of years to get a sense of "baseline functioning." For example, in Part I of my Iceland series I devote some space to discussing libertarian tendencies among Nordic peoples that go back to the Viking era and before. The small village leadership structures, religious tenancies, and land ownership practices in places like Ukraine and Russia are relevant towards understanding their descendants today. From a paleoconservative viewpoint, as one departs from historical or natural norms, one adds "stress factors" to a society that may ultimately result in its breakup or degradation in social efficiency. (See the discussion of Tom Chittum's Civil War Two below). This is consistent with the "constraint analysis" approach that I address in Chapter 38 where one starts with proven models of functioning systems. One then tries to understand how they change as one alters variables that impact on "critical nodes" and "process flows." In contrast, utopian maximalists, who are over-represented by modern liberals and anarcho-libertarians, seek to maximize particular variables like "personal freedom" without any real concern for how these changes impact on the overall system. "Libertarianism" becomes "libertinism." For an example of"maximalism," see "The Folly of Maximalist Objectives" by William S. Lind. Another reason why I find Dr. Johnson's lecture series valuable is that Eastern European history challenges many "comic book" historical cliches that are fed to Americans by their federalized education system and Jewish-controlled national media. There have been many times when I have listened to Dr. Johnson's descriptions of unfolding of historical events, which invariably involve conflicts between the monarchy, nobility, church, fledgling middle class, peasantry, and serfs, and somehow my American "programming" causes me to subconsciously expect Russian history to "zig" in many places where it instead "zags." This challenges me to think more deeply about all the different variables that make a society work and influence its national destiny. Last, but not least, one can see similar patterns behind the continued development of the police state and martial law control grid in America and what happened in Soviet Russia. Furthermore, Zionist neocons with a similar mentality to former Vice President Dick Cheney still control American foreign policy. They can still start a disastrous nuclear war. They have already instigated a "dirty nuke" war by spreading depleted uranium all over Iraq and Afghanistan. New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh claims that Dick Cheney planned an operation where U.S. Navy SEALs dressed as Iranians would attack a U.S. ship to justify war on Iran in spring 2008. In addition, the article "New Books Suggests Dick Cheney Wanted to Go To War With Russia," by Andrew Moran, 20 Feb 2010, notes that "As the South Ossetia War was being fought between the Russian Federation and Georgia in August 2008, then-Vice President Dick Cheney pushed for the United States to engage in a military conflict with Russia over its disputed invasion of the Georgian Republic, suggests a new book by Ronald Asmus titled A Little War That Shook The World, according to the Raw Story." Without question, Dr. Johnson does an excellent job of addressing many very serious current issues. He goes well beyond merely developing an academic appreciation of Slavic history. Links: rusjournal.com, the Orthodox Nationalist radio show on the Voice of Reason network.

"Red Square 2009" illustration for the Orthodox Nationalist show "The Defense Ministries of Russia and Belarus" Alexandr Solzhenitsyn photo used for the show "The GULAG"

 

 

":Leaked ‘Machete’ Script Confirms Race War Plot. According to Infowars.com: "The film is dangerous because it glorifies Machete as a hero, invoking his fictional racial struggle alongside clear parallels to current events and headlines ripped from topical news. We have already seen episodes of violent attacks, declarations of violent intent at protests (such as in Arizona and Santa Cruz, California) and demonstrable anger over attempts as regulation, such as Arizona’s recent controversial legislation..." This film is also consistent with predictions made in Tom Chittum's classic work Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America.

 

When Thomas W. Chittum first published Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America in 1996, it sent shock waves through America on par with Dr. William Pierce's Turner Diaries. An article in Instauration magazine in the late 1990's (see link below) remarked that any talk about America breaking up through "secessionism" or any other cause was the ultimate "thought crime" in America. When I wrote my publisher's preface to the Jan 2007 ebook edition of Civil War Two, the idea of hard core States Rights and secession still had not sunk in on a nationwide scale. Flash forward to "More states join gun-rights case in Montana," Helenair.com, 13 April 2010 where "A growing list of states joining the legal battle over federal gun control argued Monday that Congress can’t regulate guns made and sold within a state." Then there is "Gov. Rick Perry: Texas Could Secede, Leave Union," AP, Huffington Post, 15 April 2009 where "An animated Perry told the crowd at Austin City Hall -- one of three tea parties he was attending across the state -- that officials in Washington have abandoned the country's founding principles of limited government. He said the federal government is strangling Americans with taxation, spending and debt." Finally, there is "Miss USA Contestant Supports Arizona Illegal Immigration Law" by Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com, May 17, 2010, where Miss Oklahoma stated "“I’m a huge believer in states’ rights. I think that’s what’s so wonderful about America.” . The titles to these articles alone mark a major sea change in attitudes. Tom Chittum has written many articles about nationalist issues for The Nationalist Times and other sources, as reflected in his author archive. However, I think that just Civil War Two alone illustrates an important concept that I comment upon further in Chapter 38: "Pittsburgh False Flag "Anarchists, Cyber Militia, and the Principles of Info War," and this is the idea of a psychological or ideological "turning movement." People must first come to grips with the concept of secessionism as a remedy for the doomed multi-racial, multi-cultural empire before they can adequately grasp the importance of "popular sovereignty" and what I call "genuine nationalism" on a grass roots level. Just like a karate master who tries to focus on one spot on a brick in order to chop it in two, sometimes one really good idea can collapse an entire phony ideological matrix. Tom Chittum found that "sweet spot" in the "brick" of neo-Jacobin imperial America when he helped Americans visualize how the entire anti-racialist, anti-nationalist, pro-Zionist, unlimited Federal government ideological matrix could some day come completely apart at the seams, rather than reflect some kind of Star Trek future. For de-brainwashing purposes, the nonfiction work Civil War Two is probably more palatable for most Yuppies compared to the fictional drama The Turner Diaries because it attacks the phony ideological matrix without describing hypothetical scenes where white revolutionaries blow up the FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., cut off the heads of nonwhites for bounties, or subordinate themselves to central planners who resemble "Jedi Knights" (see my discussion of Dr. William Pierce below). Instead, whites are mostly portrayed on the defensive as victims of nonwhite racism. It is is nonwhites who secede first, such as Mexican Aztlan activists, as noted in Tom Chittum's RT interview that is also embedded on the author archive page. Chittum provides long term historical studies to underscore the concept that as a dominant ethnic group undergoes a decline process below 75-80% of the total population of a country, overall social instability starts to accelerate to the point that eventually the country will very likely either fission apart, undergo a winner-take-all civil war, or experience a repressive dictatorship to try to hold everything together at all costs. The growing instability phenomenon is rooted in human nature, such as the instinctive tendencies identified by Dr. Raymond Hall's landmark work Zoological Subspecies in Man, Mankind Quarterly, Oct 1960, the tribalistic "Evolutionary Breeding Unit" concept explained by the British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith in A New Theory of Evolution, or the ethnic-genetic distance concepts addressed in Appendix VI of my Iceland series. No amount of liberal propaganda or centralized government suppression or manipulation will overcome these facts of life over the long run. Contrary to the Star Trek vision of the future, most multi-racial societies that manage to hang together are not really fully competitive societies over the long run in terms of self-sufficient economic sectors and corresponding industrial, military, and even social capabilities, but rather require many highly "artificial" support systems or "unique situations" to sustain themselves. These de facto "dependent subcultures" often require a continuous infusion of leftist propaganda by controlled major media to suppress conflict. They typically depend on foreign aid or government welfare transfers. They often have narrow economies reliant on natural resource royalties like oil or the ability to exploit soft service industries like tourism. Geopolitically, they typically serve as trading posts or protectorates on fault zones between great powers. As one example, I lived for four years in Hawaii, and discovered that "underneath the hood" this allegedly utopian "Aloha state" where "everyone is a minority" is a very artificial society, heavily dependent on a unique tourist and service industry niche for one third of the economy. At least another third is dependent on welfare, military bases, and other government-related activity. Underneath the surface there is plenty of potential "trouble in paradise." Hawaii may not be quite as artificial and narrow as Las Vegas, Disneyland, or a nudist colony, but it is not a robust dynamo like a more homogeneous and fully industrialized society such as Germany, Sweden, or Japan either. Within a few years more nonwhites will be born in America than whites, and within twenty years, nonwhites will be the majority of the overall population. The idea that America will be as productive and viable with this new "diversity" as it was with a 90% white population back in the 1960's is a very brazen and evil lie perpetrated by an alien power elite. This chutzpah lie has been brainwashed into the minds of most Americans for decades through controlled national media. In his classic work The Dispossessed Majority, Wilmot Robertson explained the concept of "liberal minority coalition" politics where one minority can have a rational motivation to encourage leftism and ally itself with other minorities in order to build its power base relative to a white majority. This may be true up to a certain point, but Dr. William Pierce, Dr. Revilo Oliver, and other racial nationalists depicted in this section believe that the urge expressed by the Jewish power elite to socially reengineer America --to include off-shoring over 75% of its industry and real economy -- has been so persistent, so pervasive, and ultimately so self-destructive that it defies normal logical reasoning. Instead, one requires biological models which utilize "evolutionary logic" to explain "parasitic behavior" rather than "game theory logic" which explain "maximizing rewards" in order to fully understand this phenomenon. See, for example "The Scorpion and the Frog" by Dr. William Pierce, July 2001, Free Speech. In many ways, American "egalitarianism" in the last century was a counterfeit form of equality, resembling more the "equality" found among motley pirate bands described in Republic of the Pirates who equally divided up their booty, rather than the longstanding "equality" found among innately libertarian people in homogeneous northern European societies. As long as America had a growing industrial base that steadily created new real jobs and wealth, and so long as America's westward expansion offered plenty of new resources to divvy up so that different groups could still get rich by working around each other rather than fighting each other head to head, and finally, so long as there were enough WASP's to provide the social stability, idealism, and productivity necessary to economically support Marxist groups and the "Redistributor Chief" imperial federal government, this exploitation game could continue. However, this game of musical chairs has now ended. Too many musical chairs and WASP's are gone, and too many alien groups are now playing a different game by a different set of rules to a totally different tune. To help Chittum's message sink in, consider "Leaked ‘Machete’ Script Confirms Race War Plot" by Alex Jones & Aaron Dykes, Prison Planet.com, May 13, 2010. What is even more telling about the utterly decadent state of America today is that the Texas state government gave the filmmakers millions of dollars to shoot this film in Austin! It is so extremely anti-white that even Hispanic-American members of the film crew were shocked and leaked a sneak preview of the script to Alex Jones. This horror story is beyond fiction. It could be coming to your neighborhood sooner than you expect, particularly after a major economic collapse. Alex Jones thinks that the majority of Mexican-American who have American citizenship appreciate the need to maintain cooperative relationships with white Americans, even as Mexico continues to slide downhill as a failed narco state. He views the film as a probable PSYOP designed by a New World Order power elite to create unnecessary divisiveness in American society. He claims that many Mexican-Americans are very good, loyal citizens and have gotten along very well with Anglo Texans since the 1830's. But would you take this "appreciation" to the bank once the ATM machines run out, and the dollar goes to zero? My response to Alex Jones is as follows. On the one hand, I have strong humanitarian instincts and am not out to stir up unnecessary "divisiveness" or lord it over other races. But on the other hand, I naturally prefer to place priorities according to ethnic genetic distance, and I deeply resent social engineers who try to impose artificial social and political systems on me that induce me to form unnatural alliances and unnatural enemies, all in the name of helping them score quick bucks at the expense of the long term ethnic-genetic interests --and even survival-- of myself and my own people. Rather than feeling compelled to focus all their efforts on trying to preserve some kind of multi-ethnic unstable status quo in Texas, I believe that European Americans should feel perfectly free to rediscover and rebuild their own indigenous, cohesive, European folk communities. They actually worked very well for America in the 17th-19th centuries, and they can be made to work again. This does not necessarily imply any kind of hatred towards Mexicans, but rather a healthy desire by political correctness-brainwashed whites to come home to themselves. Links: Thomas Chittum author archive page at americafirstbooks.com

Thomas Chittum photo from the March 1993 Soldier of Fortune article "Day of the Jackass" Morgan Elizabeth Woolard Miss Oklahoma 2010

 

William Gayley Simpson, a former American Christian minister, created one of the most moving "soul journey" articles series I have ever read in the form of "One Man's Striving" that I have posted to the Internet in the Simpson home page. As I point out on my Religious Crisis web page, "...If you liked W. Somerset Maugham's "soul journey" novels such as The Razor's Edge and Of Human Bondage, but want something nonfiction that might really knock your socks off from a radical right perspective, please check this out." In addition, Simpson's invaluable right wing classic Which Way Western Man?, is now also available for free online through this same home page. It is also an intellectual heavy-hitter. One of my frustrations in writing about my experiences working with Capt. Eric May in the Mission of Conscience series about false flag attacks and Info War is that one can get so overwhelmed with handling all the minutiae of near term threats and unfolding news events that one misses the forest for the trees. As a matter of fact, overwhelming Americans with threats and ugliness to waste their time or beat them into some other form of fatalistic acquiescence is very much an active strategy of our New World Order enemies. (Please see the 24 May 2010 article Oil Spill = Illuminati's Covert War on America by Henry Makow, Ph.D.) At the beginning of Chapter 37 "`Operation Blackjack,' The Kansas City, KS Nuke, and the Zombie March Towards "Stalingrad II" I talk about "predictive programming," "fear mongering," and inducing "Stockholm Syndrome" as PSYOP tools. This is where the broader perspectives offered by sources such as "One Man's Striving" and Which Way Western Man? can become invaluable to help one get ones head above the muck of day-to-day affairs. At some point, patriots have to go beyond simply reacting to the latest outrages that our enemies throw at us, and instead go on the counter-offensive with our very own agenda. This can include having a personal vision of some day creating a national homeland that openly and actively supports the survival of ones own people -- to include the survival of their indigenous religious and cultural values. I think that most American nationalists agree with me that Simpson's work has really helped them connect a lot of dots on broad moral and spiritual as well as racial level. The only thing that is missing are specific nationalist objectives, such as the possible creation of specific ethno-states by specific peoples on specific territories with specific cultural characteristics and military-economic resources in North America. Which Way Western Man? may not give you such specific direction, but the title lives up to its name in terms of helping one think about "Standard Operating Procedure" from a broad nationalist conceptual perspective. Links: William Gayley Simpson home page.

 

Dr. William L. Pierce (1933-2002), a former physics professor at Oregon State University who later dedicated his life to help save his own people and Western Civilization from complete obliteration. For an online list of articles, please see Metapedia.org listing pages for Part One and Part Two. See also "William Pierce: His Mission" by Kevin Strom for other links at the end of the article. The web site of the organization he headed, the National Alliance, archives articles from Jan 1995 to Aug 2002 (VIII, No. 8). It also has National Vanguard Magazine articles for issue number 118 and earlier. See the article "Who Rules America?" that is being continually updated at the National Alliance web site. Anarcho-libertarians are generally never this honest. The online video series "America Is A Changing Country" narrated by Dr. Pierce is also a major classic. The free ebook Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds (PDF download here) by Dr. Robert S. Griffin provides a good overview of Dr. Pierce's life and philosophy. Pierce was also founder of the Cosmotheist Church, which found spirituality in the evolutionary progress of whites within the context of an evolutionary universe. The Jewish-British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once stated words to the effect that "In the long run, it is all racial." That is also essentially the implicit viewpoint of the science of sociobiology, namely that while animal behavior tends to be "environmental" in the short run, in the long run it reflects a "group genetic response." An important contribution of William Pierce was to help people think in terms of how their behavior not only impacts on their own immediate gratification, but the kind of society that will be created for their children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren. Although I never met Dr. Pierce in person, once while acting as a stock broker I had a client who worked for him at his headquarters in West Virginia. Dr. Pierce picked up the phone first quite few times and I ended up having many long conversations with him. I was always impressed with the depth of his intellect. Regarding the eugenics issue, Dr. William Pierce once stated in a personal letter sent to me in the early 1990's words to the effect that "The United States Government is the greatest enemy of the white race that has ever existed." Of course there are a lot of well-intentioned, patriotic Americans inside the U.S. Government. A major problem is that government on both federal and state levels has been hijacked by Zionists -- and before that by neo-Jacobin imperialist Robber Barons (during the War of Northern Aggression Against Southern Independence). The hijacking of America by Mossad-CIA on 9/11 that I cover in Chapter 7 and elsewhere in my Trilogy reinforces this point. As you watch the landmark video below, Dr. Pierce's statement to me will start to sound increasingly more plausible and less extreme:   "America is a Changing Country," narrated by Dr. William L. Pierce. (51 min 46 sec; also available on YouTube beginning with Part 1 of 11). Dr. Pierce died of a sudden onslaught of cancer shortly after this video was first published in 2002.   Short Critique: As an associate in the 1960's of George Lincoln Rockwell, a former editor of the National Socialist Review, and translator from German of Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin by Dietrich Eckhart and Adolf Hitler, Pierce was heavily influenced by the "German model" of political struggle, although he claims in his article "The Radicalizing of an American" in Best of Attack! that he started out as a libertarian. By the early 1990's, he had distanced himself from National Socialism to the point that he stated in a National Alliance manual that its members could claim that they were not members of a "Nazi" organization. Nevertheless, Pierce still promoted the idea of forming a monolithic pan-white organization. The leaders of a white revolution in his fictional work The Turner Diaries consisted of a circle of wise men in robes, resembling Star Wars Jedi knights, causing Lew Rockwell to quip in one of his talks that he was not particularly anxious to trade the central planning of one particular group (Zionists) for another (whites) wearing robes. All other things being equal, whites wearing robes may be a lessor evil than Zionists wearing business suits since they have vastly less ethnic-genetic distance with America's white population in general, although I agree with Rockwell (I am talking about Lew, not George Lincoln) that the happiest situation of all is to rebuild America from the grass roots upward, with a focus on organizing local popular sovereignty and stressing the importance of preserving personal liberty. Nevertheless, for individuals who are looking to de-brainwash themselves from all the race-mixing and anti-nationalist propaganda in America's Zionist-controlled major media today, the extremely well-written works of Dr. Pierce remain timeless classics. Pierce's brand of white nationalism was heavily tilted towards pan-white revolution led by authoritarian white organizations. He generally ignored differences between white ethnic groups, such as the innate individualistic streak that generally exists among Nordic American Protestants as compared to the greater authoritarianism of Alpine Catholics, or the role of various anti-WASP Catholic collaborators in supporting Jewish power in big cities. Ironically, Pierce advocated a style of white militancy that in a perverse way could help FBI COINTELPRO, NSA wiretappers, DHS, and ADL "justify" their bloated departments, while at the same time taking the focus away from vast hordes of authoritarian, rent-seeking, dogmatic, leftist-leaning Catholics who have displaced WASP's throughout federal bureaucracies. For example, Timothy McVeigh, who according to Alex Jones and many other sources was a government agent, reportedly claimed that The Turner Diaries helped inspire his alleged truck bombing of the Oklahoma City Murray Building. In actuality, only internally placed explosives were capable of taking off the face of the building. See my discussion of the McVeigh subterfuge in Chapter 17 of my Mission of Conscience series about how this likely false flag event was exploited to unfairly discredit American militia. Pierce justified the white revolutionary and urban guerilla tone of The Turner Diaries and his subsequent work Hunter (written under the pen name Andrew MacDonald) by claiming that these fictional works proved to be highly effective ways to reach a mass audience, especially prior to the advent of the Internet. There are many different ways to skin a cat. An alternative approach to combat excessive Federal and Zionist power is to promote the nonviolent revitalization of existing European ethnic groups and State's Rights secessionism, such as what did in fact exist and proved effective in the early 19th century. Given the realities of Federal and ADL spying and false flag manipulation, "swarm tactics" utilizing many different groups with many different styles and approaches may be more effective than trying to build monolithic organizations that can be easily infiltrated and hijacked. Grass roots political organizing and ethnic community redevelopment is always a necessary prerequisite before any other kind of militant behavior becomes feasible any way. For example, the Communist Viet Cong spent about five years focused on grass roots political organizing in South Vietnam and purposely avoided combat before launching into the next phase of revolutionary struggle. In addition, keep in mind that in a healthy white community, where local law enforcement has not been thoroughly federalized and militarized by a Mossad-CIA-controlled Big Brother, citizens are more than happy to augment police as volunteers, vigilantes, or posse, and enthusiastically support their local sheriff. Last, but not least, it is probably more likely that America will come apart at the seams and form separate countries than some monolithic political party will be able to "save the empire." In the long run, even if we get a military dictatorship that tries to hold the U.S. together at all cost, it will likely fail. We cannot necessarily trust the Zionist establishment and military industrial complex to manage a wise, peaceful, and rational secession process. They were not particularly wise about the way they got us into our current mess, so the jokers are wild regarding how we are going to get out. We need to keep in mind that the Mossad-CIA establishment has become so perverse that it actually welcomes violent attacks to justify installing police state and martial law control grids (to include locking down the Internet); so much so, in fact, that it has already engaged in numerous false flag terror operations against its own citizens, as documented in my Trilogy. So long as we still have a free Internet that continues to wake people up, there is no need to take the bait and trigger the police state mousetrap. Although my own personal views on the Second Amendment and the Jeffersonian right of revolution are somewhere to the right of the National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America, I still believe strongly that we have to completely exhaust all peaceful, legal means before resorting to the "Appeal to Heaven." Violence can have many very tragic unintended consequences, particularly if military forces start spreading depleted uranium all over North America, or the Zionist elite uses violence as a pretext to invite millions of U.N. soldiers --to include millions of Red Chinese military personnel -- to come into America to replace American-born military and police. The Zionist elite has already been practicing slow genocidal replacement of white Americans for decades through their open borders policy with Mexico and other nonwhite countries, not to mention their Wall Street coup de etat against the U.S. government and domestic industry, and use of "soft kill" chemical warfare waged through food and vaccine additives. Many patriotic groups have in fact wised up and are using more sophisticated approaches than in the past. This now puts the spotlight on the government and Zionist groups as key predators who frequently say stupid things and overreach themselves. As an example, in Chapter 28 I talk about how DHS Director Janet Napolitano tried to demonize "groups opposed to abortion and immigration" and how the Pentagon tried to demonize "protestors." For people who are completely ignorant about ideology and politics who want a good introduction, I would recommend initially dividing ones time about 50-50 between the works of Lew Rockwell to see a libertarian side, and Dr. William Pierce to see a racial nationalist side. In Chapter 29 "Candidate Klock, The Spook Nuke Threat and the Ron Paul Libertarian Revolution" I explain why I view Ron Paul libertarianism as "necessary but not sufficient." I have always felt the same way about Dr. William Pierce's racial nationalism. If you can reconcile both viewpoints, "You'll be a Man, my son!" (To paraphrase Rudyard's poem "If...") Even if one wants to identify oneself as a hard core racial nationalist, one still needs to study libertarianism for at least two reasons: (a) The American Revolution was fundamentally a libertarian revolution, and it is a longstanding political tradition in America to at least reference or pay lip service to libertarian ideals even if they have been totally degraded and perverted by Jews, other aliens, and government bureaucrats and (b) the libertarians at the Mises Institute provide an outstanding free education in classical economics, which is invaluable background for approaching American business people and other entrepreneurs. Business people are often scared that nationalists will bring with them more burdensome government regulation and taxation. One needs to be able to explain to them how over the long run nationalism can help preserve the white middle class and a white entrepreneurial environment, all of which in turn means less taxation, less regulation, and less overall Big Brother over the long run.

 

Kevin Alfred Strom worked closely with Dr. William Pierce as an understudy and then later tried to lead the National Alliance as his successor. He is extremely intelligent and grasps the importance of using multiple approaches (both decentralized as well as centralized) to run social and political movements. I have been impressed enough with his work to personally create an archive of his articles at americafirstbooks.com. In his younger years, Strom edited The Best of Attack! Revolutionary Voice of the National Alliance and National Vanguard Tabloid, a compilation of issues from 1970 to 1982. (Now in 64 MB PDF, download for free here; you may have to right click twice in Mozilla Firefox and overlay the first attempt).This remains an all time classic, if nothing else demonstrating how various social issues have only grown worse over time, and how we face a greater urgency today to address these issues than ever before. Unfortunately Kevin was brought down by charges made by a malevolent wife, Elisha Strom in cooperation with the Feds. There is strong evidence that he was framed, and had to plea-bargain under extreme coercion to avoid onerous long term jail conditions. Now rejoined with his family and living in Charlottesville, VA, he seems to be bouncing back. Links: Please visit the Kevin Strom archive at America First Books. Also his home page at kevin-strom.com.

 

Dr. Revilo Pendleton Oliver provides a unique historical perspective as former military intelligence director as well as professor of classics. His commentaries on political events from back issues of Liberty Bell magazine remain timeless classics. He also had amazing historical depth. Like Simpson, many of his works explain the Jewish PSYOP aspect of Christianity. Christianity creates a number of very serious problems from a nationalist ideological viewpoint, apart from being discredited on a purely rationalistic basis by Enlightenment thinkers who included America's very own Tom Paine in his Age of Reason. As a universalistic religion, Christianity is inherently leftist and hence works from an "environmental" philosophical perspective against the more "genetic" nationalist perspective. In addition, Christianity induces white gentiles to replace their own tribal history and allegiances with that of an alien people --the Jews. The evil phenomenon of "Christian Zionism," explained in the Rev Ted Pike archive, is a clear example of Jewish hijacking of indigenous gentile tribalism. In the Religious Crisis archive, I explain why I have become convinced that it is impossible to have a truly effective nationalist movement without the revitalization of indigenous religion. Although white indigenous religionists will probably never outnumber Christians in America, they can still become large enough to play a key role in containing Christian Zionist lunacy. The Oliver Biographical Note states: "Dr. Revilo Pendleton Oliver, Professor of the Classics at the University of Illinois for 32 years and one of the leading philologists of his time, read eleven languages, including Sanskrit, and for more than half a century wrote scholarly articles in four languages for academic publications in the United States and Europe. Oliver was also the possessor of a penetrating intellect — and a scintillating wit unequaled by any writer, though the great H. L. Mencken may have come close." Some of Dr. Oliver's books are online, such as: The Origins of Christianity -- published posthumously: A book-length treatise on the roots of the dominant religion of the West. Reflections on the Christ Myth -- Historical Review Press, published posthumously: An important new booklet on the genesis of the Jesus story. See also fascinating Liberty Bell articles such as: By Their Fruits Ye Shall Know Them -- Dead Sea Scrolls fraud, Christian origins and consequences, U.S. Civil War. A Persistent Hoax -- The myth of the Jewish "Diaspora." How They Stole the Church -- The palace revolution in the "modernized" Roman Catholic Church. The Last Stand -- Was the Jesus of the "New Testament" racially a Jew? Dr. Oliver looks into this question and the role of the Jew in the ancient world in this review. Links: Revilo-Oliver.com; older version of Oliver web site with photos.		Oliver in 1938
		Oliver and wife, 1990

 

Dr. David Duke is author of two important classics, namely Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening. His web site, davidduke.com, is an important source of racial nationalist information, along with the Stormfront.org thread run by his colleague Don Black. In Chapter 34 of my Trilogy, I explain what I learned from listening to Dr. Duke's talks when I attended the 2005 European American conference in New Orleans: "...Dr. David Duke explained how the national media has spent untold millions to demonize both the Klan and American Nazis. Now all they have to do is attach anything that American conservatives say to terms like "Nazi" or "Klan" and most Americans immediately tune out like classically-conditioned Pavlovian dogs. Dr. Duke explained that despite the fact that he has served as an elected representative in the Louisiana legislature, and has not been a Klan leader for over 30 years, every where he goes he is always referred to as "former Klan leader" David Duke by the controlled national media, as if this is imprinted on his birth certificate. Furthermore, his own Klan organization was completely nonviolent and law-abiding. Adding to the lies, the Jewish controlled media try to make Dr. Duke out to be an anti-Catholic WASP, even though most of the members of his Klan organization in Louisiana were Catholics and he strongly encourages WASP-Catholic unity. In his book My Awakening, Dr. Duke regrets a short demonstration he performed while a student at LSU when he wore a swastika armband. At the time, he believed what the 1960's American Nazi leader George Lincoln Rockwell said about how only Nazis seem to have the guts to come out in the open and stand up to the Jews. He was outraged at what certain high-level Jews were doing to subvert America and felt that desperate measures were justified to wake up the public. However, now he believes that Americans need to come up many different fresh approaches that keep people focused on facts and issues and avoid symbols where the Jews have been able to spend millions to brainwash people into Pavlovian reflexes. Despite the magnitude of Zionist wealth, Duke thinks that whites can still win local elections through old fashioned grass-roots political campaigning... In my "Environmental vs. Genetic" article, I discuss many important sides of racial conflict that are typically overlooked by many American racial nationalists who tend to just focus on criminal offenses and violence. Please scroll to my section headings "How too much `sugar' in a multiracial society can be just as deadly as too much `vinegar,'" followed by the sections " The `wonderful' danger, "`Uncle Tomism' and `love-bombing,'" "`Building' America one alien bootlick at a time," "The reign of the `sugar-daddies,'" and the remainder of the article through the summary. In addition, throughout history there have been a number of successful nationalist-flavored organized labor movements in places like Spain, Germany, and the Scandinavia countries. On a strategic political level, the tendency of many self-styled American nationalists to ignore organized labor and abdicate to leftists has not been very bright. I am also convinced that the only real long term solution for America's problems is for northern European peoples to recreate homogeneous tribal ethno-states -- precisely the kind environment they have evolved in for more than ten thousand years. My main issue with David Duke is the fact that he (like myself) was born and raised in the South, which remains a de facto multi-racial, multi-cultural society, oppressed by Yankee conquest, and heavily infiltrated by Jewish and Federal supremacists. David Duke identifies himself publicly as a Christian and as a politician running for office. I am more "indigenous" (shall we put it?) in terms of my own personal political and religious approach, as discussed in my author archive and Religious Crisis web page. From a purely ideological perspective, I think it is much clearer for someone to start out with a social model that reflects an indigenous, homogeneous Nordic or Celtic society, with its own land base and naturally-evolved tribal culture and religion. These societies typically had a large middle class of armed free men who practiced a native form of egalitarianism. (An Icelandic scholar once referred to his fellow citizens as "an aristocratic people with egalitarian tendencies"). This "indigenous folk" approach is much clearer to me instead of trying to find conceptual anchor points amidst the social and political mess that currently exists throughout the South today, not to mention everywhere else in America. It is also much clearer than trying to interpret the traditional culture of my own ancestors through the censorship, distortions, and warped political priorities of Jewish-controlled national media. The fact that the South started out as a multi-cultural plantation society with a negro slave underclass, and then got beat badly in a terrible war with the United States government, muddies a lot of waters compared to what I consider to be an authentic Nordic nationalist viewpoint. I prefer to start out with a society like Old Norse Iceland that in recent centuries was minding its own business and not bothering anyone up until the recent financial fiasco egged on by the Russian Jewish mafia, Rothschild-controlled City of London, and Jewish-controlled American financial firms like Goldman Sachs, as documented in my "Iceland Gets `ENRONed,' Then Goes for `1776'" series. In other words, Dr. David Duke is trying to be a pragmatist and a realist, and deal with incrementally improving things according to the way they are, rather than the way he would like for them to be. In contrast, I am currently more interested in playing the role of the intellectual rather than the politician. I am also more interested in fundamental analysis, which by definition starts at the roots. The power elite is vastly more radical than myself. Worse yet, they are radical in a extremely alien and evil way. According to Alex Jones, the end game of the global power elite is to kill off over 80% of the gentile population through false flag pandemics, nuclear wars, and other means, and then enslave the survivors with an iron dictatorship that tracks everyone with implanted RFID chips. They have been patiently assembling their martial law and police state control grids for decades. They are willing to ruthlessly confine or kill off any sectors of the overall population that might offer any form of resistance. They are prepared to use not only a growing network of FEMA camps, but also foreign troops trained to kill without question. I agree with Alex Jones that if the New World Order elite ever succeeds in using U.S. police and the U.S. military to liquidate all domestic dissidents, it is very likely that these kosher butchers will then bring in foreigners to liquidate major elements of U.S. security forces who cooperated with them. (They have already crippled major portions of the American military through depleted uranium poisoning). The Jacobin phase of the French Revolution validated the adage: "revolutions at times devour their own children." So did Stalin with his 1936-1938 Great Purge of major portions of the Bolshevik establishment and Red Army leadership. In the final analysis, no one in America is safe if the New World Order succeeds, except kosher"Members of the Tribe." The power elite is so paranoid and sick that they will eventually try to destroy any form of identity or social cohesion outside their own group, to include any American patriotic sentiment. Members of American police, FBI, the U.S. military, and other security forces who still hold quaint notions about taking seriously their oath to protect and defend the Constitution (not created by Jews!) will also be ultimately targeted for their potential resistance to absolute tyranny. The power elite has already handed over a large chunk of America's strategic industries to Red China. According to Final Judgment, Israelis jointly developed hydrogen bombs with the Red Chinese. They have also sold America's top secrets to Communist enemies, as in the Jonathan Pollard case, and operate most espionage operations against this country. They have proven a million times over that they absolutely no loyalty or any principles at all. Why would they hesitate to put Chinese generals in charge of the Pentagon and millions of Chinese soldiers in America's streets and in charge of FEMA death camps if it might serve them a political advantage? Alex Jones is not even a racial nationalist. However, the existence of Jewish Neanderthalism and other forms of ethnic-genetic distance can plausibly explain his belief that the power elite is cruel enough to install both Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Huxley's Brave New World in America. "Members of the Tribe" have already demonstrated their unlimited capacity for mass murder in Bolshevik Russia, and Zionist cruelty continues unabated against Christian and Muslim Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. The outrages and abuses will only grow worse over time until enough citizens finally organize to put an end to them. As Alex Jones puts it, if the power elite is evil enough to kill one million Iraqis without any evidence of WMD's to justify the invasion of Iraq, why would they hesitate to steal your pension, not to mention all your civil liberties? It remains to be seen whether or not enough American will finally wake up in time to the true nature of their real enemies. In the long run, it takes positive tribalism to oppose evil tribalism, hence the need for a healthy resurgence in positive forms of white nationalism. Links: davidduke.com, which include articles on the question "what is nationalism?"

Dr. David Duke upsetting the Z ionist plutocracy with another popular grass roots campaign

 

Other paleoconservatives or racial nationalists:   Instaurationonline.com This is an archive-in-progress of the magazine Instauration published from 1975 to 2000 by Wilmot Robertson, author of the classic work The Dispossessed Majority. Double click on the cover pictures to pull up PDFs for each issue. The database of back issues is being built over time by white civil rights activist James Kelso. Instauration provided a gold mine of paleoconservative and "racial nationalist" articles. John Tyndall articles archive at The Spearhead. Tyndall was a founder of the British National Party. These articles span from Aug 1999 to July 2005. I happen to agree with his prediction, made in the early 1990's, that the 21st century will in all likelihood wind up looking more like the 19th century than the 20th century, especially once the evil Zionist genie finally gets put back in its bottle, the international crime family home base state of Israel collapses, and the Orwellian, neo-Jacobin, multi-racial, multi-cutural, Zionist-dominated, welfare-warfare global "New Babylon" superstate that wages "perpetual war for perpetual peace" (for more background on the aforementioned "jabborwocky" terminology that has become synonomous with "the U.S.A." please see Chapter 6 of the Mission of Conscience series) finally breaks apart into seperate countries and common citizens rediscover "nationalism" as a vital tool for making their societies self-sustaining and viable once again (and the Lone Star flag flies at the top of the flag pole in the Republic of Texas once again!). All of this may not exactly usher in some kind of "City on the Hill" utopian "New Age" society, but at least we might wind up with something less bad than what we have right now. There are many dozens of other paleoconservative thinkers and media leaders who are worthy of mention. Please go to my Site Map section to find many of them listed under "Somewhere between libertarian, nationalist, and unbridled revisionist free-thinker" and "Racial nationalists."

 

Update References: 2010-07-15 What Would It Take? by Edmund Connelly, Occidental Observer, "I believe Whites are willfully denying the clear and present danger we face. Whether it is through late or broken marriages, lackluster efforts at having replacement-level families, or feeble efforts at keeping the governing elite from importing a new (non-White) people, demographically, White Americans are in free fall. About this, the numbers speak clearly; there is no ambiguity . . . Everything in this article written thus far describes the non-violent dispossession of Whites, but there remains the possibility of the process speeding up through mass slaughter. MacDonald is explicit in comparing the heavily Jewish Bolshevik takeover of Russia to the situation here today: “Again, the analogy is striking. As emphasized repeatedly on TOO, Whites can expect to be increasingly victimized by non-Whites with historical grudges as they sink to minority status and lose political power.” 2010-06-20 The Death of the WASP by Paul Gottfried, Taki's Magazine. 2010-06-11 Is Israel Doomed? by Chris Bollyn 2010-05 Elena Kagan and the Decline of WASP America by Kevin MacDonald, Ph. D, The Nationalist Times, May 2010